Pedro Monteiro, A. Marcori, Vitor Nascimento, A. Guimarães, V. H. Okazaki
{"title":"比较不同脚后跟高度下蹲的运动学","authors":"Pedro Monteiro, A. Marcori, Vitor Nascimento, A. Guimarães, V. H. Okazaki","doi":"10.5114/hm.2021.106164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Back squat (BS) is a popular exercise owing to its capacity to develop lower limb strength. During BS, trunk incli nation and knee range of motion (roM) are relevant aspects of a proper technique, and these movement kinematics parameters can be positively altered with official weightlifting shoes lifting the heel 13 mm above the ground. Wedges are a lowcost alternative to lifting the heel to different heights, but movement kinematics adaptations with higher elevations, above 25 mm, are not well described in the literature. thus, we compared the effect of different heights of heel wedges on BS kinematics. Methods. Fifteen experienced recreational weightlifters (22 ± 5.4 years; 83 ± 11 kg; 179 ± 6 cm; 5 ± 2.1 years of BS experience) were conveniently selected. three randomized conditions were applied: barefoot (B), 25mm (W25), and 50mm wedges (W50). BS movement was assessed by kinematic analysis with an optoelectronic camera system. Results. After ANOVA, the posthoc indicated significant roM differences in reducing trunk ( F = 27.27; p < 0.01) and increasing knee ( F = 16.87; p < 0.01) flexions between conditions. Posthoc analysis verified decreasing trunk inclination (B > W25 > W50; p < 0.05) and increasing knee (B < W25 < W50; p < 0.05) roM with increasing wedge height. Conclusions. Higher wedges allowed positive adaptations by promoting a more upright trunk position and greater BS depth. Using a heel wedge can be a lowcost and viable strategy to optimize BS technique in a variety of training settings and contexts.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the kinematics of back squats performed with different heel elevations\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Monteiro, A. Marcori, Vitor Nascimento, A. Guimarães, V. H. Okazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/hm.2021.106164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. Back squat (BS) is a popular exercise owing to its capacity to develop lower limb strength. During BS, trunk incli nation and knee range of motion (roM) are relevant aspects of a proper technique, and these movement kinematics parameters can be positively altered with official weightlifting shoes lifting the heel 13 mm above the ground. Wedges are a lowcost alternative to lifting the heel to different heights, but movement kinematics adaptations with higher elevations, above 25 mm, are not well described in the literature. thus, we compared the effect of different heights of heel wedges on BS kinematics. Methods. Fifteen experienced recreational weightlifters (22 ± 5.4 years; 83 ± 11 kg; 179 ± 6 cm; 5 ± 2.1 years of BS experience) were conveniently selected. three randomized conditions were applied: barefoot (B), 25mm (W25), and 50mm wedges (W50). BS movement was assessed by kinematic analysis with an optoelectronic camera system. Results. After ANOVA, the posthoc indicated significant roM differences in reducing trunk ( F = 27.27; p < 0.01) and increasing knee ( F = 16.87; p < 0.01) flexions between conditions. Posthoc analysis verified decreasing trunk inclination (B > W25 > W50; p < 0.05) and increasing knee (B < W25 < W50; p < 0.05) roM with increasing wedge height. Conclusions. Higher wedges allowed positive adaptations by promoting a more upright trunk position and greater BS depth. Using a heel wedge can be a lowcost and viable strategy to optimize BS technique in a variety of training settings and contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Movement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2021.106164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2021.106164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing the kinematics of back squats performed with different heel elevations
Purpose. Back squat (BS) is a popular exercise owing to its capacity to develop lower limb strength. During BS, trunk incli nation and knee range of motion (roM) are relevant aspects of a proper technique, and these movement kinematics parameters can be positively altered with official weightlifting shoes lifting the heel 13 mm above the ground. Wedges are a lowcost alternative to lifting the heel to different heights, but movement kinematics adaptations with higher elevations, above 25 mm, are not well described in the literature. thus, we compared the effect of different heights of heel wedges on BS kinematics. Methods. Fifteen experienced recreational weightlifters (22 ± 5.4 years; 83 ± 11 kg; 179 ± 6 cm; 5 ± 2.1 years of BS experience) were conveniently selected. three randomized conditions were applied: barefoot (B), 25mm (W25), and 50mm wedges (W50). BS movement was assessed by kinematic analysis with an optoelectronic camera system. Results. After ANOVA, the posthoc indicated significant roM differences in reducing trunk ( F = 27.27; p < 0.01) and increasing knee ( F = 16.87; p < 0.01) flexions between conditions. Posthoc analysis verified decreasing trunk inclination (B > W25 > W50; p < 0.05) and increasing knee (B < W25 < W50; p < 0.05) roM with increasing wedge height. Conclusions. Higher wedges allowed positive adaptations by promoting a more upright trunk position and greater BS depth. Using a heel wedge can be a lowcost and viable strategy to optimize BS technique in a variety of training settings and contexts.