颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血卷取或夹持后脑血管痉挛与患者预后

JNET Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023
Kentaro Shimoda, K. Kamiya, T. Kano, M. Furuichi, A. Yoshino
{"title":"颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血卷取或夹持后脑血管痉挛与患者预后","authors":"Kentaro Shimoda, K. Kamiya, T. Kano, M. Furuichi, A. Yoshino","doi":"10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: It is still controversial whether coiling or clipping has a lower incidence of cerebral vasospasm following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In this study, we compared angiographic vasospasm (AV), symptomatic vasospasm (SV), and the outcome of both procedures for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Methods: From 2007 to 2018, 127 patients were coiled and 127 were clipped for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed AV, SV, and the outcome of both procedures. Results: The incidence of AV was 32 (25%) patients for coiling and 59 (46%) patients for clipping. SV occurred in eight (6%) patients for coiling and 19 (15%) patients for clipping, and was significantly less in the coiling group. A favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2 on discharge) was in 71 (56%) patients for coiling and 77 (61%) patients for clipping, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The incidence of SV was significantly less in the coiling group for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Even if SV occurred following aneurysmal SAH, early therapeutic intervention may prevent deterioration of the outcome.","PeriodicalId":34768,"journal":{"name":"JNET","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral Vasospasm and Patient Outcome after Coiling or Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Shimoda, K. Kamiya, T. Kano, M. Furuichi, A. Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: It is still controversial whether coiling or clipping has a lower incidence of cerebral vasospasm following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In this study, we compared angiographic vasospasm (AV), symptomatic vasospasm (SV), and the outcome of both procedures for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Methods: From 2007 to 2018, 127 patients were coiled and 127 were clipped for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed AV, SV, and the outcome of both procedures. Results: The incidence of AV was 32 (25%) patients for coiling and 59 (46%) patients for clipping. SV occurred in eight (6%) patients for coiling and 19 (15%) patients for clipping, and was significantly less in the coiling group. A favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2 on discharge) was in 71 (56%) patients for coiling and 77 (61%) patients for clipping, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The incidence of SV was significantly less in the coiling group for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Even if SV occurred following aneurysmal SAH, early therapeutic intervention may prevent deterioration of the outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNET\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNET\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后脑血管痉挛的发生率是否较低仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们比较了血管造影血管痉挛(AV)、症状性血管痉挛(SV)以及两种手术治疗脑动脉瘤破裂的结果。方法:2007年至2018年,对127例脑动脉瘤破裂患者行螺旋治疗,127例行夹持治疗。我们回顾性地回顾了AV、SV和两种手术的结果。结果:卷取组AV发生率为32例(25%),夹取组AV发生率为59例(46%)。卷取组有8例(6%)患者发生SV,夹取组有19例(15%)患者发生SV,卷取组明显较少。卷取组71例(56%)、夹取组77例(61%)预后良好(出院时改良Rankin量表[mRS] 0-2),两组比较无显著差异。结论:脑动脉瘤破裂后,卷取组SV发生率明显降低。即使SV发生在动脉瘤性SAH之后,早期治疗干预也可以防止结果恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cerebral Vasospasm and Patient Outcome after Coiling or Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Objective: It is still controversial whether coiling or clipping has a lower incidence of cerebral vasospasm following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In this study, we compared angiographic vasospasm (AV), symptomatic vasospasm (SV), and the outcome of both procedures for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Methods: From 2007 to 2018, 127 patients were coiled and 127 were clipped for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed AV, SV, and the outcome of both procedures. Results: The incidence of AV was 32 (25%) patients for coiling and 59 (46%) patients for clipping. SV occurred in eight (6%) patients for coiling and 19 (15%) patients for clipping, and was significantly less in the coiling group. A favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2 on discharge) was in 71 (56%) patients for coiling and 77 (61%) patients for clipping, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The incidence of SV was significantly less in the coiling group for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Even if SV occurred following aneurysmal SAH, early therapeutic intervention may prevent deterioration of the outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy is the official journal of the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET). The JNET publishes peer-reviewed original research related to neuroendovascular therapy, including clinical studies, state-of-the-art technology, education, and basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信