选择合适的内管放置导尿管

JNET Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090
Y. Nishikawa, Kentaro Tanaka, T. Kitamura, Teishiki Shibata, H. Yamada, M. Oomura, Noriaki Aihara, H. Katano, S. Osaga, M. Mase
{"title":"选择合适的内管放置导尿管","authors":"Y. Nishikawa, Kentaro Tanaka, T. Kitamura, Teishiki Shibata, H. Yamada, M. Oomura, Noriaki Aihara, H. Katano, S. Osaga, M. Mase","doi":"10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Occasions to administer endovascular treatment to the elderly have increased, for which rapid and safe guiding catheter (GC) placement even in a lesion with seve re arteriosclerosis is required. We investigated an index to easily evaluate the degree of diffi culty before treatment. Methods: In all, 83 consecutive patients who received carotid artery stenting (CAS) through the transfemoral approach at our institution between May 2010 and December 2016 were divided into those in whom GC could be placed using the JB2-type inner catheter (IC) (JB2 group) and those who required the Simmon s type or Goose neck snare (SM/GS group). Vascular anatomy of the cervicothoracic region was evaluated and an index to select IC was investigated. Results: The JB2 and SM/GS groups consisted of 68 and 15 patients, respectively. The distributions of the following fi ve items were diff erent between the two groups: The level of the origin of the selected artery from the lesser curvature of t he aortic arch, aorta type, tortuosity of the common carotid artery, selected artery, and location of the lesion. On decision tree analysis of these factors, a fl owchart was prepared in which a lower level of the origin of the selected artery than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch was the fi rst layer. Conclusion: IC selection can be more accurately evaluated based on whether the level of the origin of the selected artery is lower than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch compared with evaluation of the aorta type III.","PeriodicalId":34768,"journal":{"name":"JNET","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of Appropriate Inner Catheter for Placement of Guiding Catheter\",\"authors\":\"Y. Nishikawa, Kentaro Tanaka, T. Kitamura, Teishiki Shibata, H. Yamada, M. Oomura, Noriaki Aihara, H. Katano, S. Osaga, M. Mase\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Occasions to administer endovascular treatment to the elderly have increased, for which rapid and safe guiding catheter (GC) placement even in a lesion with seve re arteriosclerosis is required. We investigated an index to easily evaluate the degree of diffi culty before treatment. Methods: In all, 83 consecutive patients who received carotid artery stenting (CAS) through the transfemoral approach at our institution between May 2010 and December 2016 were divided into those in whom GC could be placed using the JB2-type inner catheter (IC) (JB2 group) and those who required the Simmon s type or Goose neck snare (SM/GS group). Vascular anatomy of the cervicothoracic region was evaluated and an index to select IC was investigated. Results: The JB2 and SM/GS groups consisted of 68 and 15 patients, respectively. The distributions of the following fi ve items were diff erent between the two groups: The level of the origin of the selected artery from the lesser curvature of t he aortic arch, aorta type, tortuosity of the common carotid artery, selected artery, and location of the lesion. On decision tree analysis of these factors, a fl owchart was prepared in which a lower level of the origin of the selected artery than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch was the fi rst layer. Conclusion: IC selection can be more accurately evaluated based on whether the level of the origin of the selected artery is lower than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch compared with evaluation of the aorta type III.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNET\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNET\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:对老年人进行血管内治疗的场合越来越多,因此即使在严重动脉硬化的病变中也需要快速安全的导尿管(GC)置入。我们研究了一种便于评价治疗前困难程度的指标。方法:将2010年5月至2016年12月在我院连续行颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的83例患者分为可以使用JB2型内导管(IC)置入GC的组(JB2组)和需要使用Simmon型或Goose neck snare的组(SM/GS组)。评估了颈胸血管解剖,并探讨了选择IC的指标。结果:JB2组68例,SM/GS组15例。两组在以下5项分布上存在差异:所选动脉从主动脉弓小曲度的起始程度、主动脉类型、颈总动脉的弯曲程度、所选动脉、病变部位。在对这些因素进行决策树分析后,我们制作了一个流程图,其中所选动脉的起源水平低于主动脉弓小曲度的水平是第一层。结论:与评价ⅲ型主动脉相比,以所选动脉起源水平是否低于主动脉弓小曲度水平评价IC的选择更为准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of Appropriate Inner Catheter for Placement of Guiding Catheter
Objective: Occasions to administer endovascular treatment to the elderly have increased, for which rapid and safe guiding catheter (GC) placement even in a lesion with seve re arteriosclerosis is required. We investigated an index to easily evaluate the degree of diffi culty before treatment. Methods: In all, 83 consecutive patients who received carotid artery stenting (CAS) through the transfemoral approach at our institution between May 2010 and December 2016 were divided into those in whom GC could be placed using the JB2-type inner catheter (IC) (JB2 group) and those who required the Simmon s type or Goose neck snare (SM/GS group). Vascular anatomy of the cervicothoracic region was evaluated and an index to select IC was investigated. Results: The JB2 and SM/GS groups consisted of 68 and 15 patients, respectively. The distributions of the following fi ve items were diff erent between the two groups: The level of the origin of the selected artery from the lesser curvature of t he aortic arch, aorta type, tortuosity of the common carotid artery, selected artery, and location of the lesion. On decision tree analysis of these factors, a fl owchart was prepared in which a lower level of the origin of the selected artery than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch was the fi rst layer. Conclusion: IC selection can be more accurately evaluated based on whether the level of the origin of the selected artery is lower than the level of the lesser curvature of the aortic arch compared with evaluation of the aorta type III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy is the official journal of the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET). The JNET publishes peer-reviewed original research related to neuroendovascular therapy, including clinical studies, state-of-the-art technology, education, and basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信