对真理的设计:奥古斯都模拟史诗的诗学

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
D. DeLuna
{"title":"对真理的设计:奥古斯都模拟史诗的诗学","authors":"D. DeLuna","doi":"10.5860/choice.30-3108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designs on Truth: The Poetics of the Augustan Mock-Epic, by Gregory G. Colomb. Pennsylvania State U. Press, 1992. Pp. xxi + 228. In this book Colomb pursues two primary goals. Firstly, he tries to provide a useful summary description of the Augustan mock-epic. Secondly, he wants to shed light on the poetics of the genre. He is especially concerned to explain how the mock-epic uses satiric fictions to compel readers to adopt its judgmental \"pieties\" (xii), a feat that seems remarkable since its representations often utterly conflicted with contemporary readers' more empirically grounded knowledge of the historical counterparts. These objectives are, of course, commendable. Colomb might have produced a valuable study of a genre we would all like to know more about. But his book is not such a study. To begin with, Colomb does not present his materials cohesively, and his stance is pretentious. His book is \"arrayed in two parts\" (xvii): one focusing on mock-epic settings, the other on satiric portraits. An initial section, though, focuses on the mock-epic fable. In his preface Colomb states that he develops arguments about how the mock-epic \"isolates its individual persons in terms of a wealth of particulars arrayed in a diagnostic network of metonymic (and causal) relations\" (xvi), about how the mock-epic \"is fascinated by language, its powers of social control, and its frightening--and thrilling--malleability\" (xvi), and about how the genre maintains \"a complex relation to law\" (xvii). Many other plans are announced in this preface and in the course of the book. Some are taken up, but never for very long, and none are sufficiently developed. Colomb is, however, reliable, if no less profusive, in his statements about what his book does not do: \"not a story of influence .... Nor is it a genetic story\" (xi); \"I do not attempt a comprehensive account of these poems\"; \"I will show little interest in tracking down epic sources of this or that mock-epic detail\"; \"I will not, unfortunately, have much to say about how mock-epic changes when it becomes a poem about a woman\" (xvii); \"I leave to posterity the question of whether The Dispensary can become again a work of intrinsic interest\" (xix). \"Part One\" of Designs on Truth follows the \"Preface,\" an \"Introduction,\" and a \"Prologue.\" \"Part Two\" is framed by another prologue and an epilogue. The postmodern--or \"Modern\"--mode of this study reminds this reader of nothing so much as the delirious energies of Swift's Tale, but without the intentional parody. There is, though, little that is innovative about Colomb's sense of what constitutes an Augustan mock-epic, a theory he sets forth piecemeal in the first half of his book. Four traits are seen as crucial: (1) a \"strong, if caricatured resemblance to the epic fable\" (1-30), (2) a sprawling contemporary urban landscape (33-58), (3) satire (59-77), and (4) a moral precept that shares with the epic a concern with the social order (79-116). With the exception of the trait of imitating the epic fable, Colomb has borrowed his formulation wholesale from theorists of satire of the 1950s and '60s, notably, Maynard Mack, Alvin Kernan, and Ronald Paulson. But no case is made for the more appropriate application of their theory to the genre of mock-epic. In fact, Colomb does not even acknowledge his debt here. Nor does he position his formulation in relation to longstanding modern commentaries on the mock-epic, such as those by Courthope, Tillotson, and Bond. He does not, moreover, show any evidence of having read a number of more recent commentaries. This is a crucial omission since these accounts have downplayed the role of satire in defining the genre, stressing instead its ability to elevate present-day subject matter (Michael Edwards, \"A Meaning for Mock-Heroic,\" YES [1985]), to mock the epic (Jacob Fuchs, \"Knowing and Remembering: The Resources of Mock-Epic,\" PQ [1990]), and to give rise to a frivolous and playful, rather than harshly satirical, art form (Ulrich Brioch, The Eighteenth-Century Mock-Heroic Poem [1990]). …","PeriodicalId":43889,"journal":{"name":"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designs on Truth: The Poetics of the Augustan Mock-Epic\",\"authors\":\"D. DeLuna\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.30-3108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Designs on Truth: The Poetics of the Augustan Mock-Epic, by Gregory G. Colomb. Pennsylvania State U. Press, 1992. Pp. xxi + 228. In this book Colomb pursues two primary goals. Firstly, he tries to provide a useful summary description of the Augustan mock-epic. Secondly, he wants to shed light on the poetics of the genre. He is especially concerned to explain how the mock-epic uses satiric fictions to compel readers to adopt its judgmental \\\"pieties\\\" (xii), a feat that seems remarkable since its representations often utterly conflicted with contemporary readers' more empirically grounded knowledge of the historical counterparts. These objectives are, of course, commendable. Colomb might have produced a valuable study of a genre we would all like to know more about. But his book is not such a study. To begin with, Colomb does not present his materials cohesively, and his stance is pretentious. His book is \\\"arrayed in two parts\\\" (xvii): one focusing on mock-epic settings, the other on satiric portraits. An initial section, though, focuses on the mock-epic fable. In his preface Colomb states that he develops arguments about how the mock-epic \\\"isolates its individual persons in terms of a wealth of particulars arrayed in a diagnostic network of metonymic (and causal) relations\\\" (xvi), about how the mock-epic \\\"is fascinated by language, its powers of social control, and its frightening--and thrilling--malleability\\\" (xvi), and about how the genre maintains \\\"a complex relation to law\\\" (xvii). Many other plans are announced in this preface and in the course of the book. Some are taken up, but never for very long, and none are sufficiently developed. Colomb is, however, reliable, if no less profusive, in his statements about what his book does not do: \\\"not a story of influence .... Nor is it a genetic story\\\" (xi); \\\"I do not attempt a comprehensive account of these poems\\\"; \\\"I will show little interest in tracking down epic sources of this or that mock-epic detail\\\"; \\\"I will not, unfortunately, have much to say about how mock-epic changes when it becomes a poem about a woman\\\" (xvii); \\\"I leave to posterity the question of whether The Dispensary can become again a work of intrinsic interest\\\" (xix). \\\"Part One\\\" of Designs on Truth follows the \\\"Preface,\\\" an \\\"Introduction,\\\" and a \\\"Prologue.\\\" \\\"Part Two\\\" is framed by another prologue and an epilogue. The postmodern--or \\\"Modern\\\"--mode of this study reminds this reader of nothing so much as the delirious energies of Swift's Tale, but without the intentional parody. There is, though, little that is innovative about Colomb's sense of what constitutes an Augustan mock-epic, a theory he sets forth piecemeal in the first half of his book. Four traits are seen as crucial: (1) a \\\"strong, if caricatured resemblance to the epic fable\\\" (1-30), (2) a sprawling contemporary urban landscape (33-58), (3) satire (59-77), and (4) a moral precept that shares with the epic a concern with the social order (79-116). With the exception of the trait of imitating the epic fable, Colomb has borrowed his formulation wholesale from theorists of satire of the 1950s and '60s, notably, Maynard Mack, Alvin Kernan, and Ronald Paulson. But no case is made for the more appropriate application of their theory to the genre of mock-epic. In fact, Colomb does not even acknowledge his debt here. Nor does he position his formulation in relation to longstanding modern commentaries on the mock-epic, such as those by Courthope, Tillotson, and Bond. He does not, moreover, show any evidence of having read a number of more recent commentaries. This is a crucial omission since these accounts have downplayed the role of satire in defining the genre, stressing instead its ability to elevate present-day subject matter (Michael Edwards, \\\"A Meaning for Mock-Heroic,\\\" YES [1985]), to mock the epic (Jacob Fuchs, \\\"Knowing and Remembering: The Resources of Mock-Epic,\\\" PQ [1990]), and to give rise to a frivolous and playful, rather than harshly satirical, art form (Ulrich Brioch, The Eighteenth-Century Mock-Heroic Poem [1990]). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":43889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-3108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-3108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《对真理的设计:奥古斯都模拟史诗的诗学》,格里高利·g·科隆著。宾夕法尼亚州立大学出版社,1992。第21 + 228页。在这本书中,Colomb追求两个主要目标。首先,他试图对奥古斯都的讽刺史诗提供一个有用的概括描述。其次,他想阐明这种体裁的诗学。他特别关注的是,他解释了讽刺史诗是如何使用讽刺小说来迫使读者接受其判断性的“虔诚”(第十二章),这一壮举似乎是非凡的,因为它的表现往往与当代读者对历史对手的更有经验基础的知识完全冲突。这些目标当然是值得赞扬的。科隆本可以对一种我们都想要更多了解的流派进行有价值的研究。但他的书不是这样的研究。首先,科隆没有把他的材料连贯地呈现出来,他的立场是自命不凡的。他的书“分为两部分”(17章):一部分侧重于模拟史诗背景,另一部分侧重于讽刺肖像。不过,本书的第一部分主要关注的是这个模拟史诗寓言。在他的序言中,Colomb说他发展了关于模拟史诗如何“在转喻(和因果)关系的诊断网络中,通过丰富的细节来隔离个人”的论点(xvi),关于模拟史诗如何“着迷于语言,它的社会控制能力,以及它令人恐惧和激动的可塑性”(xvi),以及这种体裁如何保持“与法律的复杂关系”(xvii)。在这篇序言和本书的过程中,还宣布了许多其他计划。有些被占用了,但从来没有很长时间,没有一个是充分发展的。然而,在谈到他的书没有做的事情时,Colomb是可靠的,如果他的陈述不那么丰富的话:“不是一个有影响力的故事....这也不是遗传的故事”(十一);“我不想对这些诗做一个全面的描述”;“我不会有兴趣去追寻这个或那个模拟史诗细节的史诗来源”;“不幸的是,我不会说太多关于当模拟史诗变成一首关于女人的诗时它是如何变化的”(xvii);“我把《药房》能否再次成为一部具有内在趣味的作品的问题留给后人来解决”(19)。《设计真理》的“第一部分”是在“序言”、“介绍”和“序言”之后。“第二部分”由另一个序言和尾声构成。这种后现代——或“现代”——的研究模式,让读者想起了《斯威夫特的故事》中那种精神错乱的能量,但没有刻意的模仿。尽管如此,科隆在书的前半部分零零碎碎地阐述了一个理论,但他对奥古斯都式讽刺史诗的构成的看法几乎没有什么创新之处。四个特征被认为是至关重要的:(1)一个“强烈的,如果漫画相似的史诗寓言”(1-30),(2)一个蔓延的当代城市景观(33-58),(3)讽刺(59-77),和(4)一个道德戒律,与史诗分享对社会秩序的关注(79-116)。除了模仿史诗寓言的特点外,科伦布的创作方式完全借鉴了20世纪50年代和60年代的讽刺理论家,尤其是梅纳德·麦克、阿尔文·克南和罗纳德·保尔森。但是,他们的理论并没有更恰当地应用于模拟史诗这一类型。事实上,科隆甚至不承认他在这里欠下的债。他也没有将自己的表述与古索普、蒂洛森和邦德等人对这部讽刺史诗的长期现代评论联系起来。此外,他也没有表现出任何迹象表明他读过一些更近期的评论。这是一个至关重要的遗漏,因为这些叙述淡化了讽刺在定义这一类型时的作用,而是强调其提升当今主题的能力(迈克尔·爱德华兹,“模拟英雄的意义”,YES[1985]),嘲笑史诗(雅各布·富克斯,“知道和记住:模拟史诗的资源”,PQ[1990]),并产生一种轻浮和俏皮的,而不是严厉讽刺的艺术形式(乌尔里希·布里奥克,18世纪模拟英雄诗歌[1990])。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designs on Truth: The Poetics of the Augustan Mock-Epic
Designs on Truth: The Poetics of the Augustan Mock-Epic, by Gregory G. Colomb. Pennsylvania State U. Press, 1992. Pp. xxi + 228. In this book Colomb pursues two primary goals. Firstly, he tries to provide a useful summary description of the Augustan mock-epic. Secondly, he wants to shed light on the poetics of the genre. He is especially concerned to explain how the mock-epic uses satiric fictions to compel readers to adopt its judgmental "pieties" (xii), a feat that seems remarkable since its representations often utterly conflicted with contemporary readers' more empirically grounded knowledge of the historical counterparts. These objectives are, of course, commendable. Colomb might have produced a valuable study of a genre we would all like to know more about. But his book is not such a study. To begin with, Colomb does not present his materials cohesively, and his stance is pretentious. His book is "arrayed in two parts" (xvii): one focusing on mock-epic settings, the other on satiric portraits. An initial section, though, focuses on the mock-epic fable. In his preface Colomb states that he develops arguments about how the mock-epic "isolates its individual persons in terms of a wealth of particulars arrayed in a diagnostic network of metonymic (and causal) relations" (xvi), about how the mock-epic "is fascinated by language, its powers of social control, and its frightening--and thrilling--malleability" (xvi), and about how the genre maintains "a complex relation to law" (xvii). Many other plans are announced in this preface and in the course of the book. Some are taken up, but never for very long, and none are sufficiently developed. Colomb is, however, reliable, if no less profusive, in his statements about what his book does not do: "not a story of influence .... Nor is it a genetic story" (xi); "I do not attempt a comprehensive account of these poems"; "I will show little interest in tracking down epic sources of this or that mock-epic detail"; "I will not, unfortunately, have much to say about how mock-epic changes when it becomes a poem about a woman" (xvii); "I leave to posterity the question of whether The Dispensary can become again a work of intrinsic interest" (xix). "Part One" of Designs on Truth follows the "Preface," an "Introduction," and a "Prologue." "Part Two" is framed by another prologue and an epilogue. The postmodern--or "Modern"--mode of this study reminds this reader of nothing so much as the delirious energies of Swift's Tale, but without the intentional parody. There is, though, little that is innovative about Colomb's sense of what constitutes an Augustan mock-epic, a theory he sets forth piecemeal in the first half of his book. Four traits are seen as crucial: (1) a "strong, if caricatured resemblance to the epic fable" (1-30), (2) a sprawling contemporary urban landscape (33-58), (3) satire (59-77), and (4) a moral precept that shares with the epic a concern with the social order (79-116). With the exception of the trait of imitating the epic fable, Colomb has borrowed his formulation wholesale from theorists of satire of the 1950s and '60s, notably, Maynard Mack, Alvin Kernan, and Ronald Paulson. But no case is made for the more appropriate application of their theory to the genre of mock-epic. In fact, Colomb does not even acknowledge his debt here. Nor does he position his formulation in relation to longstanding modern commentaries on the mock-epic, such as those by Courthope, Tillotson, and Bond. He does not, moreover, show any evidence of having read a number of more recent commentaries. This is a crucial omission since these accounts have downplayed the role of satire in defining the genre, stressing instead its ability to elevate present-day subject matter (Michael Edwards, "A Meaning for Mock-Heroic," YES [1985]), to mock the epic (Jacob Fuchs, "Knowing and Remembering: The Resources of Mock-Epic," PQ [1990]), and to give rise to a frivolous and playful, rather than harshly satirical, art form (Ulrich Brioch, The Eighteenth-Century Mock-Heroic Poem [1990]). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信