不同地膜在塞尔维亚黄龙胆栽培中的应用效果

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
D. Radanović, Tatjana Marković, J. Vasin, D. Banjac
{"title":"不同地膜在塞尔维亚黄龙胆栽培中的应用效果","authors":"D. Radanović, Tatjana Marković, J. Vasin, D. Banjac","doi":"10.5937/RATPOV53-9589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field trial with yellow gentian was established (11.1 plants per m2) at 1004 m.a.s.l., in order to assess the effect of black PE (bPE), silver PE (sPE), and black permeable biodegradable (bPB) mulching films on the root yield and development during six years. The highest crop density measured prior to the root harvest (sixth year), was obtained in the plot with bPB film (84%), while in the plot with bPE and in control (without mulch) number of plants was reduced by 34.2% and 45%, respectively. In addition, application of the bPB film proved to be the most effective treatment; in the fifth and sixth year root yields per m2 increased by 92.3% and 106.0%, respectively, in comparison to bPE, and by 78.9% and 69.2%, respectively, in comparison to sPE, and by 184.4% and 169.6%, respectively, in comparison to control. Application of bPE had a lower positive effect on YG root yield than control (-18.6%-54.95%), whereas the effect of sPE was higher than the bPE and control; the achieved root yields were higher, 29.7% and 70.6%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":20996,"journal":{"name":"Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo","volume":"53 1","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficiency of using different mulch films in the cultivation of yellow gentian (Gentiana lutea L.) in Serbia\",\"authors\":\"D. Radanović, Tatjana Marković, J. Vasin, D. Banjac\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/RATPOV53-9589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Field trial with yellow gentian was established (11.1 plants per m2) at 1004 m.a.s.l., in order to assess the effect of black PE (bPE), silver PE (sPE), and black permeable biodegradable (bPB) mulching films on the root yield and development during six years. The highest crop density measured prior to the root harvest (sixth year), was obtained in the plot with bPB film (84%), while in the plot with bPE and in control (without mulch) number of plants was reduced by 34.2% and 45%, respectively. In addition, application of the bPB film proved to be the most effective treatment; in the fifth and sixth year root yields per m2 increased by 92.3% and 106.0%, respectively, in comparison to bPE, and by 78.9% and 69.2%, respectively, in comparison to sPE, and by 184.4% and 169.6%, respectively, in comparison to control. Application of bPE had a lower positive effect on YG root yield than control (-18.6%-54.95%), whereas the effect of sPE was higher than the bPE and control; the achieved root yields were higher, 29.7% and 70.6%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"30-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/RATPOV53-9589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/RATPOV53-9589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为评价黑色PE (bPE)、银色PE (sPE)和黑色可渗透生物降解(bPB)地膜对黄龙胆6年根系产量和发育的影响,在1004 m.a.s.l条件下进行了大田试验(11.1株/ m2)。根收获前(第6年)作物密度最高的是使用bPB地膜的地块(84%),而使用bPE和对照(未覆盖)的地块的植株数量分别减少了34.2%和45%。此外,应用bPB膜是最有效的处理方法;第五年和第六年,每平方米根产量分别比bPE增产92.3%和106.0%,比sPE增产78.9%和69.2%,比对照增产184.4%和169.6%。施bPE对YG根产量的正向影响低于对照(-18.6% ~ 54.95%),而施sPE对YG根产量的正向影响高于bPE和对照;根系产量较高,分别为29.7%和70.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficiency of using different mulch films in the cultivation of yellow gentian (Gentiana lutea L.) in Serbia
Field trial with yellow gentian was established (11.1 plants per m2) at 1004 m.a.s.l., in order to assess the effect of black PE (bPE), silver PE (sPE), and black permeable biodegradable (bPB) mulching films on the root yield and development during six years. The highest crop density measured prior to the root harvest (sixth year), was obtained in the plot with bPB film (84%), while in the plot with bPE and in control (without mulch) number of plants was reduced by 34.2% and 45%, respectively. In addition, application of the bPB film proved to be the most effective treatment; in the fifth and sixth year root yields per m2 increased by 92.3% and 106.0%, respectively, in comparison to bPE, and by 78.9% and 69.2%, respectively, in comparison to sPE, and by 184.4% and 169.6%, respectively, in comparison to control. Application of bPE had a lower positive effect on YG root yield than control (-18.6%-54.95%), whereas the effect of sPE was higher than the bPE and control; the achieved root yields were higher, 29.7% and 70.6%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo
Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信