Elizabeth S Wenker, E. Kendrick, Michael T. Maslanka, M. Power
{"title":"四种麻雀的脂肪评分作为身体状况的估计:一项验证研究","authors":"Elizabeth S Wenker, E. Kendrick, Michael T. Maslanka, M. Power","doi":"10.5751/jfo-00119-930205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Body condition indices are used to assess individual health of wild and captive animals. The definition of body condition varies by researcher and study goals but typically refers to measures of energy reserves; most commonly fat stores (Labocha & Hayes, 2012) . In avian biology, body condition has been correlated with individual survivability (Blums et al ., 2005), reproduction (Chastel et al ., 1995; Bêty et al ., 2003) migration (Bêty et al ., 2003; McWilliams et al ., 2004; Laursen et al ., 2019), and habitat quality (Angelier et al ., 2011; Balbontín et al ., 2012). One of the oldest and most common methods of determining avian body condition is fat scoring: using a qualitative scale to score visible subcutaneous fat (Blanchard, 1941; Helms & Drury, 1960). Scores are determined by using the fullness and color of furcular and/or abdominal regions of a bird to estimate fat reserve size and can be determined in under a minute. Fat pad size and fat score are highly correlated, making this a quick and effective means of determining body condition (Kaiser, 1993; Labocha & Hayes, 2012). Fat score can be used in tandem with other morphological measurements to more accurately predict fat mass (Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). However, it is important to note that fat score is a qualitative measurement, and therefore subjective, and there is not one single scale used (Rogers, 2003; Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). Furthermore, not all bird species carry fat in the same manner (Seewagen, 2008; Schamber et al .,","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fat scoring in four sparrow species as an estimation of body condition: a validation study\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth S Wenker, E. Kendrick, Michael T. Maslanka, M. Power\",\"doi\":\"10.5751/jfo-00119-930205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Body condition indices are used to assess individual health of wild and captive animals. The definition of body condition varies by researcher and study goals but typically refers to measures of energy reserves; most commonly fat stores (Labocha & Hayes, 2012) . In avian biology, body condition has been correlated with individual survivability (Blums et al ., 2005), reproduction (Chastel et al ., 1995; Bêty et al ., 2003) migration (Bêty et al ., 2003; McWilliams et al ., 2004; Laursen et al ., 2019), and habitat quality (Angelier et al ., 2011; Balbontín et al ., 2012). One of the oldest and most common methods of determining avian body condition is fat scoring: using a qualitative scale to score visible subcutaneous fat (Blanchard, 1941; Helms & Drury, 1960). Scores are determined by using the fullness and color of furcular and/or abdominal regions of a bird to estimate fat reserve size and can be determined in under a minute. Fat pad size and fat score are highly correlated, making this a quick and effective means of determining body condition (Kaiser, 1993; Labocha & Hayes, 2012). Fat score can be used in tandem with other morphological measurements to more accurately predict fat mass (Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). However, it is important to note that fat score is a qualitative measurement, and therefore subjective, and there is not one single scale used (Rogers, 2003; Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). Furthermore, not all bird species carry fat in the same manner (Seewagen, 2008; Schamber et al .,\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5751/jfo-00119-930205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/jfo-00119-930205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
身体状况指数用于评估野生动物和圈养动物的个体健康。身体状况的定义因研究人员和研究目标而异,但通常指的是能量储备的测量;最常见的是脂肪商店(Labocha & Hayes, 2012)。在鸟类生物学中,身体状况与个体生存能力(Blums et al ., 2005)、繁殖能力(Chastel et al ., 1995;Bêty等人,2003)迁移(Bêty等人,2003;McWilliams et al ., 2004;Laursen et al ., 2019)和栖息地质量(Angelier et al ., 2011;Balbontín et al ., 2012)。确定禽类身体状况的最古老和最常用的方法之一是脂肪评分:使用定性量表对可见皮下脂肪进行评分(Blanchard, 1941;Helms & Drury, 1960)。分数是通过使用鸟的圆形和/或腹部区域的丰满度和颜色来估计脂肪储备大小,可以在一分钟内确定。脂肪垫大小与脂肪评分高度相关,使其成为确定身体状况的快速有效手段(Kaiser, 1993;Labocha & Hayes, 2012)。脂肪评分可以与其他形态学测量一起使用,以更准确地预测脂肪量(Labocha & Hayes, 2012;McWilliams & Whitman, 2013)。然而,值得注意的是,脂肪评分是一种定性测量,因此是主观的,并没有使用单一的量表(Rogers, 2003;Labocha & Hayes, 2012;McWilliams & Whitman, 2013)。此外,并非所有鸟类都以同样的方式携带脂肪(Seewagen, 2008;Schamber等人;
Fat scoring in four sparrow species as an estimation of body condition: a validation study
Body condition indices are used to assess individual health of wild and captive animals. The definition of body condition varies by researcher and study goals but typically refers to measures of energy reserves; most commonly fat stores (Labocha & Hayes, 2012) . In avian biology, body condition has been correlated with individual survivability (Blums et al ., 2005), reproduction (Chastel et al ., 1995; Bêty et al ., 2003) migration (Bêty et al ., 2003; McWilliams et al ., 2004; Laursen et al ., 2019), and habitat quality (Angelier et al ., 2011; Balbontín et al ., 2012). One of the oldest and most common methods of determining avian body condition is fat scoring: using a qualitative scale to score visible subcutaneous fat (Blanchard, 1941; Helms & Drury, 1960). Scores are determined by using the fullness and color of furcular and/or abdominal regions of a bird to estimate fat reserve size and can be determined in under a minute. Fat pad size and fat score are highly correlated, making this a quick and effective means of determining body condition (Kaiser, 1993; Labocha & Hayes, 2012). Fat score can be used in tandem with other morphological measurements to more accurately predict fat mass (Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). However, it is important to note that fat score is a qualitative measurement, and therefore subjective, and there is not one single scale used (Rogers, 2003; Labocha & Hayes, 2012; McWilliams & Whitman, 2013). Furthermore, not all bird species carry fat in the same manner (Seewagen, 2008; Schamber et al .,