诺贝尔奖获奖系列:我们的动力是什么?

Jeffrey C. Hall, M. Rosbash, Michael W. Young
{"title":"诺贝尔奖获奖系列:我们的动力是什么?","authors":"Jeffrey C. Hall, M. Rosbash, Michael W. Young","doi":"10.5860/choice.27-6684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of an internal biological clock has been known since ancient times, but the inner workings of that clock—what makes life on earth tick—remained a mystery until the three American geneticists investigated the clock’s inner workings and explained how plants, mammals, and humans adapt their circadian rhythm to synchronize with the Earth’s rotation. In the 18th century, a French astronomer Jean Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan observed how mimosa plants opened and closed their leaves in response to sunrise and sunset, even when placed in complete darkness. He concluded that the plant had its own biological mechanism— the circadian rhythm—that enabled it to respond to these fluctuations. Over 200 years later, American researchers Seymour Benzer and Ronald Konopka demonstrated how mutations in an unknown gene disrupted the circadian clock of fruit flies. They named the mutation period, but their findings did not apply to humans nor did they explain how the phenomenon came about. These studies on fruit flies formed the foundation for Hall and Rosbash’s work in the early 1980s at Brandeis University in Boston. Young, meanwhile, was working independently at Rockefeller University in New York to isolate the period gene. Hall and Rosbash discovered that PER, the protein encoded by period, accumulated during the night and degraded during the day and that it oscillated over a 24-h cycle in synchronization with the circadian rhythm. How these circadian oscillations could be generated and sustained remained unclear. The pair hypothesized that the PER protein blocked the activity of the period gene via an ‘inhibitory feedback loop’ and could thus prevent its own synthesis and thereby regulate its own level in a continuous, cyclic rhythm (Figure 1). However, in order to block the activity of the period gene, PER protein, which is produced in the cytoplasm, would have to reach the genetic material in the cell nucleus. To fully understand how PER protein builds up in the nucleus during the night, Hall and Rosbash needed to identify how it got there. In 1994, Young discovered a second clock gene, timeless, encoding the TIM protein that was required for a normal circadian rhythm. He showed that when TIM bound to PER, the two proteins were able to enter the cell nucleus where they blocked period gene activity to close the inhibitory feedback loop (Figure 2). This however, failed to identify what controlled the frequency of the oscillations until Young identified another gene, doubletime, encoding the DBT protein that delayed the accumulation of the PER protein. This explained how an oscillation is more closely adjusted to match a 24-h cycle. Together, these discoveries provided a ‘key’ by establishing the mechanistic principles which ‘unlocked’ the inner workings of the biological clock and identified how the component parts work together. These ‘fundamental brilliant studies’ were credited with solving one of the great puzzles in physiology and were judged to have ‘unravelled","PeriodicalId":76257,"journal":{"name":"Nursing mirror","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nobel Laureate Series What Makes Us Tick?\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey C. Hall, M. Rosbash, Michael W. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.27-6684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of an internal biological clock has been known since ancient times, but the inner workings of that clock—what makes life on earth tick—remained a mystery until the three American geneticists investigated the clock’s inner workings and explained how plants, mammals, and humans adapt their circadian rhythm to synchronize with the Earth’s rotation. In the 18th century, a French astronomer Jean Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan observed how mimosa plants opened and closed their leaves in response to sunrise and sunset, even when placed in complete darkness. He concluded that the plant had its own biological mechanism— the circadian rhythm—that enabled it to respond to these fluctuations. Over 200 years later, American researchers Seymour Benzer and Ronald Konopka demonstrated how mutations in an unknown gene disrupted the circadian clock of fruit flies. They named the mutation period, but their findings did not apply to humans nor did they explain how the phenomenon came about. These studies on fruit flies formed the foundation for Hall and Rosbash’s work in the early 1980s at Brandeis University in Boston. Young, meanwhile, was working independently at Rockefeller University in New York to isolate the period gene. Hall and Rosbash discovered that PER, the protein encoded by period, accumulated during the night and degraded during the day and that it oscillated over a 24-h cycle in synchronization with the circadian rhythm. How these circadian oscillations could be generated and sustained remained unclear. The pair hypothesized that the PER protein blocked the activity of the period gene via an ‘inhibitory feedback loop’ and could thus prevent its own synthesis and thereby regulate its own level in a continuous, cyclic rhythm (Figure 1). However, in order to block the activity of the period gene, PER protein, which is produced in the cytoplasm, would have to reach the genetic material in the cell nucleus. To fully understand how PER protein builds up in the nucleus during the night, Hall and Rosbash needed to identify how it got there. In 1994, Young discovered a second clock gene, timeless, encoding the TIM protein that was required for a normal circadian rhythm. He showed that when TIM bound to PER, the two proteins were able to enter the cell nucleus where they blocked period gene activity to close the inhibitory feedback loop (Figure 2). This however, failed to identify what controlled the frequency of the oscillations until Young identified another gene, doubletime, encoding the DBT protein that delayed the accumulation of the PER protein. This explained how an oscillation is more closely adjusted to match a 24-h cycle. Together, these discoveries provided a ‘key’ by establishing the mechanistic principles which ‘unlocked’ the inner workings of the biological clock and identified how the component parts work together. These ‘fundamental brilliant studies’ were credited with solving one of the great puzzles in physiology and were judged to have ‘unravelled\",\"PeriodicalId\":76257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing mirror\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing mirror\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-6684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing mirror","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-6684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

人体内部生物钟的存在自古以来就为人所知,但这个生物钟的内部工作原理——是什么让地球上的生命滴答滴答——一直是个谜,直到三位美国遗传学家研究了这个生物钟的内部工作原理,并解释了植物、哺乳动物和人类是如何调整自己的昼夜节律以与地球自转同步的。在18世纪,法国天文学家让·雅克·德·奥图斯·德·梅兰观察到含羞草植物是如何根据日出和日落张开和闭合叶子的,即使是在完全黑暗的环境中。他的结论是,植物有自己的生物机制——昼夜节律——使其能够对这些波动做出反应。200多年后,美国研究人员西摩·本泽和罗纳德·科诺普卡证明了一种未知基因的突变是如何扰乱果蝇的生物钟的。他们命名了突变期,但他们的发现并不适用于人类,也没有解释这种现象是如何产生的。这些对果蝇的研究为霍尔和罗斯巴什在20世纪80年代初在波士顿布兰代斯大学的工作奠定了基础。与此同时,杨正在纽约洛克菲勒大学独立工作,分离经期基因。霍尔和罗斯巴什发现,按周期编码的蛋白质PER在夜间积累,在白天降解,并在24小时的周期内与昼夜节律同步振荡。这些昼夜节律振荡是如何产生和维持的尚不清楚。两人假设PER蛋白通过“抑制反馈回路”阻断周期基因的活性,因此可以阻止其自身合成,从而以连续的循环节律调节其自身水平(图1)。然而,为了阻断周期基因的活性,在细胞质中产生的PER蛋白必须到达细胞核中的遗传物质。为了充分了解PER蛋白是如何在夜间在细胞核中形成的,霍尔和罗斯巴什需要确定它是如何到达那里的。1994年,杨发现了第二个时钟基因,它是永恒的,编码正常昼夜节律所需的TIM蛋白。他表明,当TIM与PER结合时,这两种蛋白质能够进入细胞核,在那里它们阻断周期基因活性,关闭抑制反馈回路(图2)。然而,这未能确定是什么控制了振荡的频率,直到Young发现了另一个基因,双重编码DBT蛋白,延迟了PER蛋白的积累。这解释了振荡是如何更紧密地调整以匹配24小时周期的。总之,这些发现提供了一把“钥匙”,通过建立机制原理来“解锁”生物钟的内部运作,并确定各组成部分是如何协同工作的。这些“基础上的杰出研究”被认为解决了生理学中的一个重大难题,并被认为已经“解开”了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nobel Laureate Series What Makes Us Tick?
The existence of an internal biological clock has been known since ancient times, but the inner workings of that clock—what makes life on earth tick—remained a mystery until the three American geneticists investigated the clock’s inner workings and explained how plants, mammals, and humans adapt their circadian rhythm to synchronize with the Earth’s rotation. In the 18th century, a French astronomer Jean Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan observed how mimosa plants opened and closed their leaves in response to sunrise and sunset, even when placed in complete darkness. He concluded that the plant had its own biological mechanism— the circadian rhythm—that enabled it to respond to these fluctuations. Over 200 years later, American researchers Seymour Benzer and Ronald Konopka demonstrated how mutations in an unknown gene disrupted the circadian clock of fruit flies. They named the mutation period, but their findings did not apply to humans nor did they explain how the phenomenon came about. These studies on fruit flies formed the foundation for Hall and Rosbash’s work in the early 1980s at Brandeis University in Boston. Young, meanwhile, was working independently at Rockefeller University in New York to isolate the period gene. Hall and Rosbash discovered that PER, the protein encoded by period, accumulated during the night and degraded during the day and that it oscillated over a 24-h cycle in synchronization with the circadian rhythm. How these circadian oscillations could be generated and sustained remained unclear. The pair hypothesized that the PER protein blocked the activity of the period gene via an ‘inhibitory feedback loop’ and could thus prevent its own synthesis and thereby regulate its own level in a continuous, cyclic rhythm (Figure 1). However, in order to block the activity of the period gene, PER protein, which is produced in the cytoplasm, would have to reach the genetic material in the cell nucleus. To fully understand how PER protein builds up in the nucleus during the night, Hall and Rosbash needed to identify how it got there. In 1994, Young discovered a second clock gene, timeless, encoding the TIM protein that was required for a normal circadian rhythm. He showed that when TIM bound to PER, the two proteins were able to enter the cell nucleus where they blocked period gene activity to close the inhibitory feedback loop (Figure 2). This however, failed to identify what controlled the frequency of the oscillations until Young identified another gene, doubletime, encoding the DBT protein that delayed the accumulation of the PER protein. This explained how an oscillation is more closely adjusted to match a 24-h cycle. Together, these discoveries provided a ‘key’ by establishing the mechanistic principles which ‘unlocked’ the inner workings of the biological clock and identified how the component parts work together. These ‘fundamental brilliant studies’ were credited with solving one of the great puzzles in physiology and were judged to have ‘unravelled
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信