一个病例报告的不准确的调查问卷作为一个时期的病人的状况

M. Kostic, A. Munjiza, Ana Jakoviljević
{"title":"一个病例报告的不准确的调查问卷作为一个时期的病人的状况","authors":"M. Kostic, A. Munjiza, Ana Jakoviljević","doi":"10.5937/PSIHDAN2001067K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scales for assessment of patients with depression are in use for several decades. Among the most used are Hamilton's depression scale and the younger Patient Health Questionnaire. Even though both are heavily used in research and clinical practice they are still controversial and with questionable usefulness. This case report shows that the question whether a patient is better or worse can be diametrically opposite depending on the scale used (using these two most influential ones as examples) and what are the reasons for this.","PeriodicalId":31896,"journal":{"name":"Psihijatrija Danas","volume":"52 1","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case report of the inaccuracy of the questionnaire as a meriod of the patient's condition\",\"authors\":\"M. Kostic, A. Munjiza, Ana Jakoviljević\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/PSIHDAN2001067K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scales for assessment of patients with depression are in use for several decades. Among the most used are Hamilton's depression scale and the younger Patient Health Questionnaire. Even though both are heavily used in research and clinical practice they are still controversial and with questionable usefulness. This case report shows that the question whether a patient is better or worse can be diametrically opposite depending on the scale used (using these two most influential ones as examples) and what are the reasons for this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihijatrija Danas\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihijatrija Danas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/PSIHDAN2001067K\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihijatrija Danas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/PSIHDAN2001067K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于评估抑郁症患者的量表已经使用了几十年。其中最常用的是汉密尔顿抑郁量表和年轻患者健康问卷。尽管这两种方法在研究和临床实践中被大量使用,但它们仍然存在争议,是否有用也值得怀疑。这个病例报告表明,根据所使用的量表(以这两个最具影响力的量表为例),病人是好还是坏的问题可能完全相反,原因是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case report of the inaccuracy of the questionnaire as a meriod of the patient's condition
Scales for assessment of patients with depression are in use for several decades. Among the most used are Hamilton's depression scale and the younger Patient Health Questionnaire. Even though both are heavily used in research and clinical practice they are still controversial and with questionable usefulness. This case report shows that the question whether a patient is better or worse can be diametrically opposite depending on the scale used (using these two most influential ones as examples) and what are the reasons for this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信