少即是多?:关于法官人数和司法效率

Q4 Social Sciences

Pravni Zapisi Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/pravzap0-41043

Bojan Spaić, Mila Đorđević

{"title":"少即是多?:关于法官人数和司法效率","authors":"Bojan Spaić, Mila Đorđević","doi":"10.5937/pravzap0-41043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we deal with the relationship between the relative number of judges within a jurisdiction and the efficiency of the judiciary. To determine how the number of judges influences efficiency, we compare data on the judiciary from six countries: Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, France, Austria and Norway. The analysis is based on data collected within the 2020 Evaluation cycle (2018 data) of CEPEJ and World Justice Report Rule of Law Index for 2018. We conclude that judicial efficiency does not increase with an increase in the number of judges in a jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":53056,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Zapisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Less is more?: On the number of judges and judicial efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Bojan Spaić, Mila Đorđević\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/pravzap0-41043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we deal with the relationship between the relative number of judges within a jurisdiction and the efficiency of the judiciary. To determine how the number of judges influences efficiency, we compare data on the judiciary from six countries: Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, France, Austria and Norway. The analysis is based on data collected within the 2020 Evaluation cycle (2018 data) of CEPEJ and World Justice Report Rule of Law Index for 2018. We conclude that judicial efficiency does not increase with an increase in the number of judges in a jurisdiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravni Zapisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravni Zapisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-41043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Zapisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-41043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，我们讨论了司法管辖区内法官的相对数量与司法效率之间的关系。为了确定法官数量如何影响效率，我们比较了六个国家的司法数据:塞尔维亚、克罗地亚、斯洛文尼亚、法国、奥地利和挪威。该分析基于CEPEJ 2020年评估周期(2018年数据)和2018年世界司法报告法治指数收集的数据。我们得出的结论是，司法效率不会随着一个司法管辖区法官人数的增加而增加。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Less is more?: On the number of judges and judicial efficiency

In this paper, we deal with the relationship between the relative number of judges within a jurisdiction and the efficiency of the judiciary. To determine how the number of judges influences efficiency, we compare data on the judiciary from six countries: Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, France, Austria and Norway. The analysis is based on data collected within the 2020 Evaluation cycle (2018 data) of CEPEJ and World Justice Report Rule of Law Index for 2018. We conclude that judicial efficiency does not increase with an increase in the number of judges in a jurisdiction.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Pravni Zapisi Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks