学习行动主义:当代社会运动的思想生活

Q3 Social Sciences
Matthew Waugh, Angelina S. Lee
{"title":"学习行动主义:当代社会运动的思想生活","authors":"Matthew Waugh, Angelina S. Lee","doi":"10.5860/choice.195414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements by Aziz Choudry North York, Ontario: University of Toronto Press, 2015, 199 pages ISBN: 978-1-4426-0790-3 (paperback) For Aziz Choudry (2015), author of Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements, learning and knowledge production, as well as theory and strategy development among social movements, are best understood through engagement and dialogue that occur within the movements themselves. As a means to produce knowledge that is relevant to the social movement, learning comes through action and experience, the behind-the-scenes work where activists organize, negotiate and deliberate, and educate and learn from movement successes and pitfalls within formal and informal spaces. Learning Activism, in many ways, attempts to bridge the divide between social movement activists and out-of-the-box scholars who study or view such movements as sterile environments containing \"ordinary people\" who may be thought of incapable of theorizing or producing knowledge. The first chapter, \"Knowledge Production, Learning, and Education in Social Movement Activism,\" begins by directly stating that the future is influenced through present and past struggles, by the choices made and theories that are developed by individuals or collectives, by \"ordinary\" people and so-called \"experts.\" The author makes clear that social movements can fail in the absence of theory that explains economic conditions and power struggles. Yet, an important point often overlooked by activist scholars specifically, as well as educational researchers more broadly, is one of Choudry's (2015) finest critiques, who does the theorizing? While arguing against intellectual appropriation of struggles in social movements, the author challenges academics and activists to think about and legitimate the work done in day-to-day social movement practices. Without recognition and validation of knowledge production and learning that come about through social movement practices and struggles in social activism, theory development and knowledge production become monopolised by institutional \"experts.\" The second chapter, \"Critiquing the Study of Social Movements: Theories, Knowledge, History, and Action,\" examines the intersection between theory development, understanding social movement, and knowledge production. This chapter brings a sharp critique of not only the historical social movement scholarship that perceived activism as merely a social problem, and deviant acts imposed upon a stable society, but the perception of activists displaying irrational behaviours and the movement itself being abnormal has endured to this day. From Occupy Wall Street protests in Zuccotti Park to the 2012 Quebec student strike, concerns brought forward by activists have often been dismissed in favour of maintaining current power structures while negatively characterising protestors through media outlets, elected officials, and certain segments of the public. Aziz Choudry argues against the reflexive application of theories that have been fashioned in the First World/North towards colonized contexts without reflecting on the unique lived experiences, struggles, and social relations of people in the Third World/ South. This obligates not only social activist researchers to reject \"an overattachment to paradigms, typologies, and criteria for describing movements,\" but for social science scholars as well who may continue to codify and rely on specialized language and knowledge that only acts as a barrier to meaningful discussions between scholars and research participants (Choudry, 2015, p. …","PeriodicalId":40063,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Waugh, Angelina S. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.195414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements by Aziz Choudry North York, Ontario: University of Toronto Press, 2015, 199 pages ISBN: 978-1-4426-0790-3 (paperback) For Aziz Choudry (2015), author of Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements, learning and knowledge production, as well as theory and strategy development among social movements, are best understood through engagement and dialogue that occur within the movements themselves. As a means to produce knowledge that is relevant to the social movement, learning comes through action and experience, the behind-the-scenes work where activists organize, negotiate and deliberate, and educate and learn from movement successes and pitfalls within formal and informal spaces. Learning Activism, in many ways, attempts to bridge the divide between social movement activists and out-of-the-box scholars who study or view such movements as sterile environments containing \\\"ordinary people\\\" who may be thought of incapable of theorizing or producing knowledge. The first chapter, \\\"Knowledge Production, Learning, and Education in Social Movement Activism,\\\" begins by directly stating that the future is influenced through present and past struggles, by the choices made and theories that are developed by individuals or collectives, by \\\"ordinary\\\" people and so-called \\\"experts.\\\" The author makes clear that social movements can fail in the absence of theory that explains economic conditions and power struggles. Yet, an important point often overlooked by activist scholars specifically, as well as educational researchers more broadly, is one of Choudry's (2015) finest critiques, who does the theorizing? While arguing against intellectual appropriation of struggles in social movements, the author challenges academics and activists to think about and legitimate the work done in day-to-day social movement practices. Without recognition and validation of knowledge production and learning that come about through social movement practices and struggles in social activism, theory development and knowledge production become monopolised by institutional \\\"experts.\\\" The second chapter, \\\"Critiquing the Study of Social Movements: Theories, Knowledge, History, and Action,\\\" examines the intersection between theory development, understanding social movement, and knowledge production. This chapter brings a sharp critique of not only the historical social movement scholarship that perceived activism as merely a social problem, and deviant acts imposed upon a stable society, but the perception of activists displaying irrational behaviours and the movement itself being abnormal has endured to this day. From Occupy Wall Street protests in Zuccotti Park to the 2012 Quebec student strike, concerns brought forward by activists have often been dismissed in favour of maintaining current power structures while negatively characterising protestors through media outlets, elected officials, and certain segments of the public. Aziz Choudry argues against the reflexive application of theories that have been fashioned in the First World/North towards colonized contexts without reflecting on the unique lived experiences, struggles, and social relations of people in the Third World/ South. This obligates not only social activist researchers to reject \\\"an overattachment to paradigms, typologies, and criteria for describing movements,\\\" but for social science scholars as well who may continue to codify and rely on specialized language and knowledge that only acts as a barrier to meaningful discussions between scholars and research participants (Choudry, 2015, p. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":40063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.195414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.195414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《学习行动主义:当代社会运动的思想生活》作者Aziz Choudry, North York, Ontario:多伦多大学出版社,2015,199页ISBN: 978-1-4426-0790-3(平装本)对于Aziz Choudry(2015),《学习行动主义:当代社会运动的思想生活》一书的作者,学习和知识生产,以及社会运动中的理论和战略发展,最好通过参与和对话来理解运动本身。作为产生与社会运动相关的知识的一种手段,学习来自于行动和经验,来自于活动家组织、谈判和深思熟虑的幕后工作,以及在正式和非正式空间中教育和学习运动的成功和缺陷。在许多方面,学习行动主义试图弥合社会运动积极分子和开箱即用的学者之间的鸿沟,这些学者研究或认为这些运动是无菌的环境,其中包含可能被认为无法理论化或产生知识的“普通人”。第一章“社会运动行动主义中的知识生产、学习和教育”一开始就直接指出,未来受到现在和过去的斗争、个人或集体做出的选择和发展的理论、“普通人”和所谓的“专家”的影响。作者明确指出,如果没有解释经济状况和权力斗争的理论,社会运动就会失败。然而,有一点经常被激进主义学者,以及更广泛的教育研究人员所忽视,那就是乔德里(2015)最优秀的批评之一,谁在进行理论化?在反对社会运动中斗争的知识挪用的同时,作者要求学者和活动家思考和合法化日常社会运动实践中所做的工作。如果不承认和验证通过社会运动实践和社会行动主义斗争产生的知识生产和学习,理论发展和知识生产就会被机构“专家”垄断。第二章,“批判社会运动研究:理论、知识、历史和行动”,考察了理论发展、理解社会运动和知识生产之间的交集。这一章不仅对历史上的社会运动学术提出了尖锐的批评,这些学术认为激进主义仅仅是一个社会问题,是强加给稳定社会的越轨行为,而且对激进主义者表现出非理性行为和运动本身不正常的看法一直持续到今天。从祖科蒂公园(Zuccotti Park)的“占领华尔街”抗议活动到2012年魁北克学生罢课,活动人士提出的担忧往往被驳回,有利于维持现有的权力结构,同时通过媒体、民选官员和某些公众群体对抗议者进行负面描述。Aziz Choudry反对将第一世界/北方形成的理论反思性地应用于殖民背景,而不考虑第三世界/南方人民独特的生活经历、斗争和社会关系。这不仅要求社会活动家研究人员拒绝“过度依赖范式、类型化和描述运动的标准”,也要求社会科学学者继续编纂和依赖专业语言和知识,而这些语言和知识只会成为学者和研究参与者之间有意义讨论的障碍(Choudry, 2015, p. ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements
Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements by Aziz Choudry North York, Ontario: University of Toronto Press, 2015, 199 pages ISBN: 978-1-4426-0790-3 (paperback) For Aziz Choudry (2015), author of Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements, learning and knowledge production, as well as theory and strategy development among social movements, are best understood through engagement and dialogue that occur within the movements themselves. As a means to produce knowledge that is relevant to the social movement, learning comes through action and experience, the behind-the-scenes work where activists organize, negotiate and deliberate, and educate and learn from movement successes and pitfalls within formal and informal spaces. Learning Activism, in many ways, attempts to bridge the divide between social movement activists and out-of-the-box scholars who study or view such movements as sterile environments containing "ordinary people" who may be thought of incapable of theorizing or producing knowledge. The first chapter, "Knowledge Production, Learning, and Education in Social Movement Activism," begins by directly stating that the future is influenced through present and past struggles, by the choices made and theories that are developed by individuals or collectives, by "ordinary" people and so-called "experts." The author makes clear that social movements can fail in the absence of theory that explains economic conditions and power struggles. Yet, an important point often overlooked by activist scholars specifically, as well as educational researchers more broadly, is one of Choudry's (2015) finest critiques, who does the theorizing? While arguing against intellectual appropriation of struggles in social movements, the author challenges academics and activists to think about and legitimate the work done in day-to-day social movement practices. Without recognition and validation of knowledge production and learning that come about through social movement practices and struggles in social activism, theory development and knowledge production become monopolised by institutional "experts." The second chapter, "Critiquing the Study of Social Movements: Theories, Knowledge, History, and Action," examines the intersection between theory development, understanding social movement, and knowledge production. This chapter brings a sharp critique of not only the historical social movement scholarship that perceived activism as merely a social problem, and deviant acts imposed upon a stable society, but the perception of activists displaying irrational behaviours and the movement itself being abnormal has endured to this day. From Occupy Wall Street protests in Zuccotti Park to the 2012 Quebec student strike, concerns brought forward by activists have often been dismissed in favour of maintaining current power structures while negatively characterising protestors through media outlets, elected officials, and certain segments of the public. Aziz Choudry argues against the reflexive application of theories that have been fashioned in the First World/North towards colonized contexts without reflecting on the unique lived experiences, struggles, and social relations of people in the Third World/ South. This obligates not only social activist researchers to reject "an overattachment to paradigms, typologies, and criteria for describing movements," but for social science scholars as well who may continue to codify and rely on specialized language and knowledge that only acts as a barrier to meaningful discussions between scholars and research participants (Choudry, 2015, p. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Education
Canadian Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Education (CJE) is a national peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the membership of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. The CJE prioritizes research and scholarly writing that is of relevance to the Canadian education community. The journal is read by scholars worldwide, and aims to represent the valuable contributions that Canadian scholars in education continue to make to the field. The Journal accepts and publishes both French and English articles and book reviews. CJE on occasion also publishes international papers that shed light on shared issues and that include Canadian authors as references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信