《法律批判理论

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. Frug
{"title":"《法律批判理论","authors":"G. Frug","doi":"10.53300/001C.5971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many law professors consider their primary job to be teaching legal doctrine and legal skills. Students, they think, must learn how to find applicable legal rules and how to make the kind of arguments lawyers use in court. Of course, as academics, these law teachers also feel that they should offer their students something more than legal doctrine; they need to provide students with some theoretical insight into the subjects they teach. But since the primary job of law professors is to teach law, not theory, they treat any theoretical dimension that law schools offer as necessarily limited. Some theoretical questions can properly be addressed in basic courses, and others can be addressed later in law school in optional courses such as jurisprudence or legal history. But these matters are “extras”, not the core of the curriculum It is obvious, they might say, that the primary focus of teaching law has to be law.","PeriodicalId":43058,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Theory of Law\",\"authors\":\"G. Frug\",\"doi\":\"10.53300/001C.5971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many law professors consider their primary job to be teaching legal doctrine and legal skills. Students, they think, must learn how to find applicable legal rules and how to make the kind of arguments lawyers use in court. Of course, as academics, these law teachers also feel that they should offer their students something more than legal doctrine; they need to provide students with some theoretical insight into the subjects they teach. But since the primary job of law professors is to teach law, not theory, they treat any theoretical dimension that law schools offer as necessarily limited. Some theoretical questions can properly be addressed in basic courses, and others can be addressed later in law school in optional courses such as jurisprudence or legal history. But these matters are “extras”, not the core of the curriculum It is obvious, they might say, that the primary focus of teaching law has to be law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.5971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.5971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

许多法学教授认为他们的主要工作是教授法律理论和法律技能。他们认为,学生必须学习如何找到适用的法律规则,以及如何提出律师在法庭上使用的那种论点。当然,作为学者,这些法律教师也觉得他们应该给学生提供比法律理论更多的东西;他们需要为学生提供一些关于他们所教科目的理论见解。但由于法学教授的主要工作是教授法律,而不是理论,他们认为法学院提供的任何理论维度都必然是有限的。一些理论问题可以在基础课程中适当地解决,而其他问题可以在法学院的选修课程中解决,如法理学或法律史。但这些都是“额外的”,而不是课程的核心。很明显,他们可能会说,教授法律的主要焦点必须是法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Theory of Law
Many law professors consider their primary job to be teaching legal doctrine and legal skills. Students, they think, must learn how to find applicable legal rules and how to make the kind of arguments lawyers use in court. Of course, as academics, these law teachers also feel that they should offer their students something more than legal doctrine; they need to provide students with some theoretical insight into the subjects they teach. But since the primary job of law professors is to teach law, not theory, they treat any theoretical dimension that law schools offer as necessarily limited. Some theoretical questions can properly be addressed in basic courses, and others can be addressed later in law school in optional courses such as jurisprudence or legal history. But these matters are “extras”, not the core of the curriculum It is obvious, they might say, that the primary focus of teaching law has to be law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Education Review
Legal Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信