参与公共对话小组的影响

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Beatriz Adolfo, Laura Vilela e Souza, M. Moscheta
{"title":"参与公共对话小组的影响","authors":"Beatriz Adolfo, Laura Vilela e Souza, M. Moscheta","doi":"10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to analyze the effects of the participation of health, education and religious professionals in public conversation groups with LGBT people. Participants were interviewed some weeks after the groups for feedback. Professionals declared that this dialogic method (known as Public Conversations Project) allowed a qualification of their practices, awareness about the challenges of talking about gender and sexual diversity at their professional’s contexts, and a broader contact with narratives of violence and discrimination against LGBT people. The structure of dialogue allowed participants to talk and listen in a less evaluative context. Differences in the effects produced by each group are discussed in relation to the differences in the group composition and to the specificities of the health, educational and religious contexts.","PeriodicalId":44194,"journal":{"name":"Athenea Digital","volume":"16 1","pages":"441-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efeitos da participação em grupos de conversações públicas\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Adolfo, Laura Vilela e Souza, M. Moscheta\",\"doi\":\"10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.2015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research was to analyze the effects of the participation of health, education and religious professionals in public conversation groups with LGBT people. Participants were interviewed some weeks after the groups for feedback. Professionals declared that this dialogic method (known as Public Conversations Project) allowed a qualification of their practices, awareness about the challenges of talking about gender and sexual diversity at their professional’s contexts, and a broader contact with narratives of violence and discrimination against LGBT people. The structure of dialogue allowed participants to talk and listen in a less evaluative context. Differences in the effects produced by each group are discussed in relation to the differences in the group composition and to the specificities of the health, educational and religious contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athenea Digital\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"441-463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athenea Digital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.2015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athenea Digital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.2015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是分析卫生、教育和宗教专业人士参与与LGBT人群的公共对话小组的影响。参与者在小组结束几周后接受了采访,以获得反馈。专业人士宣称,这种对话方法(被称为“公共对话项目”)可以让他们的实践获得资格,让他们意识到在专业背景下谈论性别和性多样性所面临的挑战,并更广泛地接触到对LGBT人群的暴力和歧视的叙述。对话的结构允许参与者在较少评价的环境中交谈和倾听。根据群体构成的差异以及健康、教育和宗教背景的特殊性,讨论了每个群体产生的影响的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efeitos da participação em grupos de conversações públicas
The aim of this research was to analyze the effects of the participation of health, education and religious professionals in public conversation groups with LGBT people. Participants were interviewed some weeks after the groups for feedback. Professionals declared that this dialogic method (known as Public Conversations Project) allowed a qualification of their practices, awareness about the challenges of talking about gender and sexual diversity at their professional’s contexts, and a broader contact with narratives of violence and discrimination against LGBT people. The structure of dialogue allowed participants to talk and listen in a less evaluative context. Differences in the effects produced by each group are discussed in relation to the differences in the group composition and to the specificities of the health, educational and religious contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Athenea Digital
Athenea Digital SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Ahora que el fenómeno de la disciplinarización institucional está cada vez más marcado, Athenea Digital promueve la reflexión interdisciplinar en la tradición de las ciencias humanas y sociales. La revista aborda los fenómenos sociales contemporáneos en sus múltiples dimensiones (política, económica, cultural, comunicacional...) y valora la reflexión rigurosa sobre la articulación entre los diferentes dominios de la actividad humana. El principal objetivo de la revista es potenciar el diálogo y la innovación en los estudios sociales y culturales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信