María Laura Fernández, M. Otero, N. Schweigmann, H. Solari
{"title":"1871年布宜诺斯艾利斯黄热病爆发的最初焦点的数学辅助重建","authors":"María Laura Fernández, M. Otero, N. Schweigmann, H. Solari","doi":"10.4279/PIP.050002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss the histo ric mortality record corresponding to the initial focus of the yellow fever epidemic outbreak registered in Buenos Aires during the year 1871 as compared to simulations of a stochastic population dynamics model. This model incorporates the biology of the urban vector of yellow fever, the mosquito Aedes aegypti , the stages of the disease in the human being as well as the spatial extension of the epidemic outbreak. After introducing the historical context and the restrictions it puts on initial conditions and ecological parameters, we discuss the general features of the simulation and the dependence on initial conditions and available sites for breeding the vector. We discuss the sensitivity, to the free parameters, of statistical estimators such as: final death toll, day of the year when the outbreak reached half the total mortality and the normalized daily mortality, showing some striking regularities. The model is precise and accurate enough to discuss the truthfulness of the presently accepted historic discussions of the epidemic causes, showing that there are more likely scenarios for the historic facts. Received: 9 October 2012, Accepted: 1 March 2013; Edited by: G. Mindlin; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.050002 Cite as: M L Fernandez, M Otero, N Schweigmann, H G Solari , Papers in Physics 5, 050002 (2013)","PeriodicalId":19791,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mathematically assisted reconstruction of the initial focus of the yellow fever outbreak in Buenos Aires (1871)\",\"authors\":\"María Laura Fernández, M. Otero, N. Schweigmann, H. Solari\",\"doi\":\"10.4279/PIP.050002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We discuss the histo ric mortality record corresponding to the initial focus of the yellow fever epidemic outbreak registered in Buenos Aires during the year 1871 as compared to simulations of a stochastic population dynamics model. This model incorporates the biology of the urban vector of yellow fever, the mosquito Aedes aegypti , the stages of the disease in the human being as well as the spatial extension of the epidemic outbreak. After introducing the historical context and the restrictions it puts on initial conditions and ecological parameters, we discuss the general features of the simulation and the dependence on initial conditions and available sites for breeding the vector. We discuss the sensitivity, to the free parameters, of statistical estimators such as: final death toll, day of the year when the outbreak reached half the total mortality and the normalized daily mortality, showing some striking regularities. The model is precise and accurate enough to discuss the truthfulness of the presently accepted historic discussions of the epidemic causes, showing that there are more likely scenarios for the historic facts. Received: 9 October 2012, Accepted: 1 March 2013; Edited by: G. Mindlin; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.050002 Cite as: M L Fernandez, M Otero, N Schweigmann, H G Solari , Papers in Physics 5, 050002 (2013)\",\"PeriodicalId\":19791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers in Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers in Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4279/PIP.050002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4279/PIP.050002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
我们讨论了1871年布宜诺斯艾利斯登记的黄热病疫情爆发初始焦点对应的历史死亡率记录,并与随机种群动态模型的模拟进行了比较。该模型结合了黄热病的城市传播媒介——埃及伊蚊的生物学特性、人类患病的阶段以及疫情爆发的空间扩展。在介绍了历史背景及其对初始条件和生态参数的限制之后,我们讨论了模拟的一般特征以及对初始条件和繁殖载体可用地点的依赖。我们讨论了统计估计量对自由参数的敏感性,如:最终死亡人数、爆发达到总死亡率一半的年份日期和标准化的每日死亡率,显示出一些显著的规律。该模型足够精确和准确,可以讨论目前公认的关于流行病原因的历史讨论的真实性,表明历史事实有更多可能的情景。收稿日期:2012年10月9日,收稿日期:2013年3月1日;编辑:G.明德林;引用全文:M L Fernandez, M Otero, N Schweigmann, H G Solari, Papers in Physics 5, 050002 (2013)
A mathematically assisted reconstruction of the initial focus of the yellow fever outbreak in Buenos Aires (1871)
We discuss the histo ric mortality record corresponding to the initial focus of the yellow fever epidemic outbreak registered in Buenos Aires during the year 1871 as compared to simulations of a stochastic population dynamics model. This model incorporates the biology of the urban vector of yellow fever, the mosquito Aedes aegypti , the stages of the disease in the human being as well as the spatial extension of the epidemic outbreak. After introducing the historical context and the restrictions it puts on initial conditions and ecological parameters, we discuss the general features of the simulation and the dependence on initial conditions and available sites for breeding the vector. We discuss the sensitivity, to the free parameters, of statistical estimators such as: final death toll, day of the year when the outbreak reached half the total mortality and the normalized daily mortality, showing some striking regularities. The model is precise and accurate enough to discuss the truthfulness of the presently accepted historic discussions of the epidemic causes, showing that there are more likely scenarios for the historic facts. Received: 9 October 2012, Accepted: 1 March 2013; Edited by: G. Mindlin; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.050002 Cite as: M L Fernandez, M Otero, N Schweigmann, H G Solari , Papers in Physics 5, 050002 (2013)
期刊介绍:
Papers in Physics publishes original research in all areas of physics and its interface with other subjects. The scope includes, but is not limited to, physics of particles and fields, condensed matter, relativity and gravitation, nuclear physics, physics of fluids, biophysics, econophysics, chemical physics, statistical mechanics, soft condensed matter, materials science, mathematical physics and general physics. Contributions in the areas of foundations of physics, history of physics and physics education are not considered for publication. Articles published in Papers in Physics contain substantial new results and ideas that advance the state of physics in a non-trivial way. Articles are strictly reviewed by specialists prior to publication. Papers in Physics highlights outstanding articles published in the journal through the Editors'' choice section. Papers in Physics offers two distinct editorial treatments to articles from which authors can choose. In Traditional Review, manuscripts are submitted to anonymous reviewers seeking constructive criticism and editors make a decision on whether publication is appropriate. In Open Review, manuscripts are sent to reviewers. If the paper is considered original and technically sound, the article, the reviewer''s comments and the author''s reply are published alongside the names of all involved. This way, Papers in Physics promotes the open discussion of controversies among specialists that are of help to the reader and to the transparency of the editorial process. Moreover, our reviewers receive their due recognition by publishing a recorded citable report. Papers in Physics publishes Commentaries from the reviewer(s) if major disagreements remain after exchange with the authors or if a different insight proposed is considered valuable for the readers.