工业干扰对阿尔伯塔北部森林中三种猫头鹰的累积效应的微弱支持

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J. Shonfield, E. Bayne
{"title":"工业干扰对阿尔伯塔北部森林中三种猫头鹰的累积效应的微弱支持","authors":"J. Shonfield, E. Bayne","doi":"10.5751/ace-02409-180109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Human-caused disturbances are encroaching on natural areas and quantifying the relative effects of different types of disturbance, and whether they interact on a landscape to create additive or synergistic cumulative effects, will provide a better understanding of how wildlife are affected. We evaluated potential cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on habitat use of Barred Owls ( Strix varia ), Great Horned Owls ( Bubo virginianus ), and Boreal Owls ( Aegolius funereus ) in Alberta’s boreal forest using acoustic survey presence/absence data and boosted regression tree analysis to quantify the relative importance and interactions of different types of industrial disturbance, as well as forest age and composition. Barred Owls were more likely to be found in older mixedwood and deciduous forest, and we found evidence suggestive of cumulative effects from a negative effect of total human footprint on habitat use and an additional negative effect of roads. Great Horned Owls were found in older forest but were relatively tolerant of disturbance, and soft linear features (seismic lines, pipelines, transmission lines) had a positive effect on habitat use, possibly due to these types of disturbances creating suitable hunting habitat. Boreal Owls were more likely to be found in older coniferous forest, and the effects of disturbance did not show clear evidence of sensitivity or tolerance to human disturbance. Our results indicate the importance of forest age and composition on habitat use for these owls. Cumulative effects varied among owl species and were potentially more significant for Barred Owl; for the other two species the effects of industrial disturbance were relatively small and there was no evidence of cumulative effects. Our study also demonstrates that assessing cumulative effects of human disturbance on wildlife using boosted-regression trees can effectively help focus conservation efforts and can be used, for example, for evaluating the environment effects of new projects prior to their implementation","PeriodicalId":49233,"journal":{"name":"Avian Conservation and Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weak support for cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on three owl species in Alberta’s boreal forest\",\"authors\":\"J. Shonfield, E. Bayne\",\"doi\":\"10.5751/ace-02409-180109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Human-caused disturbances are encroaching on natural areas and quantifying the relative effects of different types of disturbance, and whether they interact on a landscape to create additive or synergistic cumulative effects, will provide a better understanding of how wildlife are affected. We evaluated potential cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on habitat use of Barred Owls ( Strix varia ), Great Horned Owls ( Bubo virginianus ), and Boreal Owls ( Aegolius funereus ) in Alberta’s boreal forest using acoustic survey presence/absence data and boosted regression tree analysis to quantify the relative importance and interactions of different types of industrial disturbance, as well as forest age and composition. Barred Owls were more likely to be found in older mixedwood and deciduous forest, and we found evidence suggestive of cumulative effects from a negative effect of total human footprint on habitat use and an additional negative effect of roads. Great Horned Owls were found in older forest but were relatively tolerant of disturbance, and soft linear features (seismic lines, pipelines, transmission lines) had a positive effect on habitat use, possibly due to these types of disturbances creating suitable hunting habitat. Boreal Owls were more likely to be found in older coniferous forest, and the effects of disturbance did not show clear evidence of sensitivity or tolerance to human disturbance. Our results indicate the importance of forest age and composition on habitat use for these owls. Cumulative effects varied among owl species and were potentially more significant for Barred Owl; for the other two species the effects of industrial disturbance were relatively small and there was no evidence of cumulative effects. Our study also demonstrates that assessing cumulative effects of human disturbance on wildlife using boosted-regression trees can effectively help focus conservation efforts and can be used, for example, for evaluating the environment effects of new projects prior to their implementation\",\"PeriodicalId\":49233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Conservation and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Conservation and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-02409-180109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Conservation and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-02409-180109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 人为干扰正在侵占自然区域,量化不同类型干扰的相对影响,以及它们是否在景观上相互作用,产生叠加效应或协同累积效应,将有助于更好地了解野生动物是如何受到影响的。利用声学调查的存在/缺失数据,评估了工业干扰对阿尔伯塔北部森林中横斑猫头鹰(Strix varia)、大角猫头鹰(Bubo virginianus)和北方猫头鹰(Aegolius funereus)栖息地利用的潜在累积效应,并采用增强回归树分析来量化不同类型工业干扰的相对重要性和相互作用,以及森林年龄和组成。横斑猫头鹰更有可能出现在较老的混交林和落叶林中,我们发现的证据表明,人类总足迹对栖息地利用的负面影响和道路的额外负面影响存在累积效应。大角猫头鹰在古老的森林中发现,但对干扰相对耐受,软线性特征(地震线、管道、输电线路)对栖息地的利用有积极影响,可能是因为这些类型的干扰创造了合适的狩猎栖息地。北方猫头鹰更有可能出现在古老的针叶林中,干扰的影响没有显示出对人类干扰的敏感或耐受的明确证据。我们的研究结果表明,森林年龄和组成对这些猫头鹰的栖息地利用的重要性。累积效应因猫头鹰种类而异,对横斑猫头鹰可能更为显著;工业干扰对其他两个物种的影响相对较小,没有证据表明存在累积效应。我们的研究还表明,利用增强回归树评估人类干扰对野生动物的累积影响,可以有效地帮助集中保护工作,并可用于评估新项目实施前的环境影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weak support for cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on three owl species in Alberta’s boreal forest
. Human-caused disturbances are encroaching on natural areas and quantifying the relative effects of different types of disturbance, and whether they interact on a landscape to create additive or synergistic cumulative effects, will provide a better understanding of how wildlife are affected. We evaluated potential cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on habitat use of Barred Owls ( Strix varia ), Great Horned Owls ( Bubo virginianus ), and Boreal Owls ( Aegolius funereus ) in Alberta’s boreal forest using acoustic survey presence/absence data and boosted regression tree analysis to quantify the relative importance and interactions of different types of industrial disturbance, as well as forest age and composition. Barred Owls were more likely to be found in older mixedwood and deciduous forest, and we found evidence suggestive of cumulative effects from a negative effect of total human footprint on habitat use and an additional negative effect of roads. Great Horned Owls were found in older forest but were relatively tolerant of disturbance, and soft linear features (seismic lines, pipelines, transmission lines) had a positive effect on habitat use, possibly due to these types of disturbances creating suitable hunting habitat. Boreal Owls were more likely to be found in older coniferous forest, and the effects of disturbance did not show clear evidence of sensitivity or tolerance to human disturbance. Our results indicate the importance of forest age and composition on habitat use for these owls. Cumulative effects varied among owl species and were potentially more significant for Barred Owl; for the other two species the effects of industrial disturbance were relatively small and there was no evidence of cumulative effects. Our study also demonstrates that assessing cumulative effects of human disturbance on wildlife using boosted-regression trees can effectively help focus conservation efforts and can be used, for example, for evaluating the environment effects of new projects prior to their implementation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Conservation and Ecology
Avian Conservation and Ecology BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ORNITHOLOGY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Avian Conservation and Ecology is an open-access, fully electronic scientific journal, sponsored by the Society of Canadian Ornithologists and Birds Canada. We publish papers that are scientifically rigorous and relevant to the bird conservation community in a cost-effective electronic approach that makes them freely available to scientists and the public in real-time. ACE is a fully indexed ISSN journal that welcomes contributions from scientists all over the world. While the name of the journal implies a publication niche of conservation AND ecology, we think the theme of conservation THROUGH ecology provides a better sense of our purpose. As such, we are particularly interested in contributions that use a scientifically sound and rigorous approach to the achievement of avian conservation as revealed through insights into ecological principles and processes. Papers are expected to fall along a continuum of pure conservation and management at one end to more pure ecology at the other but our emphasis will be on those contributions with direct relevance to conservation objectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信