{"title":"接种和未接种胸膜肺炎放线杆菌的猪群血清学监测","authors":"Hugo Dunlop, S. McOrist","doi":"10.54846/jshap/1206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Investigate diagnostic serology for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) infections in naturally infected and vaccinated pigs. Materials and methods: The APP status of 12 farms (A-L) was established by lung cultures and isolate serotyping. Screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detected antibodies to ApxIV antigen or multiple APP serotypes. Serotype-specific ELISAs were conducted for serotypes 5 and 7. Seven groups of farm F pigs (serotype 7) were moved to farm K (serotype 5). Autogenous vaccines (V1/V2) prepared from APP serotype 5 cultures from farm K and a commercial, killed APP vaccine (V3) containing serotypes 1, 7, and 15 were used to vaccinate pigs in each group twice or thrice at 3-week intervals, commencing at 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were analyzed with ELISAs specific for serotype 5 and ApxI and ApxII toxins. Serum titers were compared using an analysis of variance. Results: Serotypes 5, 7, 12, or 15 were present in lung cultures. The ApxIV screening ELISA and mix-serotype ELISA regularly detected serotypes 5, 7, and 15. Serotype 12 infections were detected in the mix-serotype ELISA, but not in the ApxIV assays. The serotype 5 or 7 specific ELISA regularly detected herd infections with the relevant serotype. Serotype 5 titers of pigs vaccinated with V1/V2 thrice were higher than those dosed twice with the equivalent volume (P < .05). Pigs receiving V3 showed no serotype 5 antibody response. The ApxI and II titers in V1/V2-vaccinated pigs were higher than controls. Implications: Screening and serotype-specific ELISAs verified APP status. Repeated serotype-specific autogenous APP vaccine doses provided a strong antibody response.","PeriodicalId":17095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serologic monitoring of herds with and without bacterin vaccination for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Dunlop, S. McOrist\",\"doi\":\"10.54846/jshap/1206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Investigate diagnostic serology for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) infections in naturally infected and vaccinated pigs. Materials and methods: The APP status of 12 farms (A-L) was established by lung cultures and isolate serotyping. Screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detected antibodies to ApxIV antigen or multiple APP serotypes. Serotype-specific ELISAs were conducted for serotypes 5 and 7. Seven groups of farm F pigs (serotype 7) were moved to farm K (serotype 5). Autogenous vaccines (V1/V2) prepared from APP serotype 5 cultures from farm K and a commercial, killed APP vaccine (V3) containing serotypes 1, 7, and 15 were used to vaccinate pigs in each group twice or thrice at 3-week intervals, commencing at 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were analyzed with ELISAs specific for serotype 5 and ApxI and ApxII toxins. Serum titers were compared using an analysis of variance. Results: Serotypes 5, 7, 12, or 15 were present in lung cultures. The ApxIV screening ELISA and mix-serotype ELISA regularly detected serotypes 5, 7, and 15. Serotype 12 infections were detected in the mix-serotype ELISA, but not in the ApxIV assays. The serotype 5 or 7 specific ELISA regularly detected herd infections with the relevant serotype. Serotype 5 titers of pigs vaccinated with V1/V2 thrice were higher than those dosed twice with the equivalent volume (P < .05). Pigs receiving V3 showed no serotype 5 antibody response. The ApxI and II titers in V1/V2-vaccinated pigs were higher than controls. Implications: Screening and serotype-specific ELISAs verified APP status. Repeated serotype-specific autogenous APP vaccine doses provided a strong antibody response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Swine Health and Production\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Swine Health and Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Serologic monitoring of herds with and without bacterin vaccination for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae
Objective: Investigate diagnostic serology for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) infections in naturally infected and vaccinated pigs. Materials and methods: The APP status of 12 farms (A-L) was established by lung cultures and isolate serotyping. Screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detected antibodies to ApxIV antigen or multiple APP serotypes. Serotype-specific ELISAs were conducted for serotypes 5 and 7. Seven groups of farm F pigs (serotype 7) were moved to farm K (serotype 5). Autogenous vaccines (V1/V2) prepared from APP serotype 5 cultures from farm K and a commercial, killed APP vaccine (V3) containing serotypes 1, 7, and 15 were used to vaccinate pigs in each group twice or thrice at 3-week intervals, commencing at 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were analyzed with ELISAs specific for serotype 5 and ApxI and ApxII toxins. Serum titers were compared using an analysis of variance. Results: Serotypes 5, 7, 12, or 15 were present in lung cultures. The ApxIV screening ELISA and mix-serotype ELISA regularly detected serotypes 5, 7, and 15. Serotype 12 infections were detected in the mix-serotype ELISA, but not in the ApxIV assays. The serotype 5 or 7 specific ELISA regularly detected herd infections with the relevant serotype. Serotype 5 titers of pigs vaccinated with V1/V2 thrice were higher than those dosed twice with the equivalent volume (P < .05). Pigs receiving V3 showed no serotype 5 antibody response. The ApxI and II titers in V1/V2-vaccinated pigs were higher than controls. Implications: Screening and serotype-specific ELISAs verified APP status. Repeated serotype-specific autogenous APP vaccine doses provided a strong antibody response.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Swine Health & Production (JSHAP) is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal published by the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) since 1993. The aim of the journal is the timely publication of peer-reviewed papers with a scope that encompasses the many domains of applied swine health and production, including the diagnosis, treatment, management, prevention and eradication of swine diseases, welfare & behavior, nutrition, public health, epidemiology, food safety, biosecurity, pharmaceuticals, antimicrobial use and resistance, reproduction, growth, systems flow, economics, and facility design. The journal provides a platform for researchers, veterinary practitioners, academics, and students to share their work with an international audience. The journal publishes information that contains an applied and practical focus and presents scientific information that is accessible to the busy veterinary practitioner as well as to the research and academic community. Hence, manuscripts with an applied focus are considered for publication, and the journal publishes original research, brief communications, case reports/series, literature reviews, commentaries, diagnostic notes, production tools, and practice tips. All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Swine Health & Production are peer-reviewed.