分娩与分娩多维健康控制点量表(MHLC-LD-R)的修订

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
B. K. Thege, V. Sallay, B. Rafael, T. Martos
{"title":"分娩与分娩多维健康控制点量表(MHLC-LD-R)的修订","authors":"B. K. Thege, V. Sallay, B. Rafael, T. Martos","doi":"10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the present study was to develop and psychometrically investigate a revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD). The rationale for this development was the need to assess labour and delivery specific health-related control beliefs regardless of the respondent’s reproductive stage or role in giving birth (e.g., woman in reproductive age but not pregnant, expectant mother, support person, spouse, health care provider). Methods: Altogether, 991 women (M age = 26.45 years, SD = 5.42) completed the online survey, 767 (77.4%) of whom were pregnant. Beyond the newly developed, revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD-R), the test bat-tery included items measuring sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, general health-related control beliefs, attitudes toward certain birth-related issues, and level of fulfilment with regards to autonomy and competence needs. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor solution representing internal-, chance-, and health care professional-related control beliefs. The internal consistency of each 4-item subscale was good. The analyses to test construct validity supported the convergent and divergent validity of the MHLC-LD-R dimensions. Conclusion : The MHLC-LD-R is an economic and psychometrically adequate tool to assess deliv-ery-related control beliefs regardless of the individual’s actual stage in the reproductive life cycle or role in giving birth. Further research is needed using the instrument with partners and other rele vant actors in the process of labour and delivery.","PeriodicalId":42949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mental Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"5-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Revised Version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD-R)\",\"authors\":\"B. K. Thege, V. Sallay, B. Rafael, T. Martos\",\"doi\":\"10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of the present study was to develop and psychometrically investigate a revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD). The rationale for this development was the need to assess labour and delivery specific health-related control beliefs regardless of the respondent’s reproductive stage or role in giving birth (e.g., woman in reproductive age but not pregnant, expectant mother, support person, spouse, health care provider). Methods: Altogether, 991 women (M age = 26.45 years, SD = 5.42) completed the online survey, 767 (77.4%) of whom were pregnant. Beyond the newly developed, revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD-R), the test bat-tery included items measuring sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, general health-related control beliefs, attitudes toward certain birth-related issues, and level of fulfilment with regards to autonomy and competence needs. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor solution representing internal-, chance-, and health care professional-related control beliefs. The internal consistency of each 4-item subscale was good. The analyses to test construct validity supported the convergent and divergent validity of the MHLC-LD-R dimensions. Conclusion : The MHLC-LD-R is an economic and psychometrically adequate tool to assess deliv-ery-related control beliefs regardless of the individual’s actual stage in the reproductive life cycle or role in giving birth. Further research is needed using the instrument with partners and other rele vant actors in the process of labour and delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"5-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是开发和心理计量学调查的修订版本的多维健康控制点量表的劳动和分娩(MHLC-LD)。这样做的理由是,需要评估分娩和分娩时与健康有关的具体控制信念,而不考虑被调查者的生殖阶段或在分娩中的作用(例如,育龄但未怀孕的妇女、孕妇、支助人员、配偶、保健提供者)。方法:共991名女性(M年龄26.45岁,SD = 5.42)完成在线调查,其中767名(77.4%)为孕妇。除了新开发的修订版《分娩和分娩多维健康控制点量表》(MHLC-LD-R)之外,测试单元还包括测量社会人口特征、自评健康、一般健康相关控制信念、对某些与出生有关的问题的态度以及对自主和能力需求的满足程度的项目。结果:验证性因素分析支持一个三因素解决方案,代表内部、机会和卫生保健专业相关的控制信念。各4项量表内部一致性较好。结构效度检验支持MHLC-LD-R维度的收敛效度和发散效度。结论:MHLC-LD-R是一种经济和心理计量学上足够的工具,可以评估分娩相关的控制信念,而不考虑个体在生殖生命周期中的实际阶段或在分娩中的作用。需要在分娩和分娩过程中与伙伴和其他相关行为者一起使用该仪器进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Revised Version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD-R)
Background: The aim of the present study was to develop and psychometrically investigate a revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD). The rationale for this development was the need to assess labour and delivery specific health-related control beliefs regardless of the respondent’s reproductive stage or role in giving birth (e.g., woman in reproductive age but not pregnant, expectant mother, support person, spouse, health care provider). Methods: Altogether, 991 women (M age = 26.45 years, SD = 5.42) completed the online survey, 767 (77.4%) of whom were pregnant. Beyond the newly developed, revised version of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales for Labour and Delivery (MHLC-LD-R), the test bat-tery included items measuring sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, general health-related control beliefs, attitudes toward certain birth-related issues, and level of fulfilment with regards to autonomy and competence needs. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor solution representing internal-, chance-, and health care professional-related control beliefs. The internal consistency of each 4-item subscale was good. The analyses to test construct validity supported the convergent and divergent validity of the MHLC-LD-R dimensions. Conclusion : The MHLC-LD-R is an economic and psychometrically adequate tool to assess deliv-ery-related control beliefs regardless of the individual’s actual stage in the reproductive life cycle or role in giving birth. Further research is needed using the instrument with partners and other rele vant actors in the process of labour and delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Mental Health
European Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mental Health, an open-access, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary, professional journal concerned with mental health, personal well-being and its supporting ecosystems that acknowledge the importance of people’s interactions with their environments, established in 2006, is published on 280 pages per volume in English and German by the Semmelweis University Institute of Mental Health. The journal’s professional oversight is provided by the Editor-in-Chief and an international Editorial Board, assisted by an Advisory Board. The semiannual journal, with issues appearing in June and December, is published in Budapest. The journal aims at the dissemination of the latest scientific research on mental health and well-being in Europe. It seeks novel, integrative and comprehensive, applied as well as theoretical articles that are inspiring for professionals and practitioners with different fields of interest: social and natural sciences, humanities and different segments of mental health research and practice. The primary thematic focus of EJMH is the social-ecological antecedents of mental health and foundations of human well-being. Most specifically, the journal welcomes contributions that present high-quality, original research findings on well-being and mental health across the lifespan and in historical perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信