J. Kenyon, Casey B. Wilkinson, M. Dunlap, G. Aeby, C. Kryss
{"title":"夏威夷群岛西北部Layson岛和Lisianski岛/Neva浅滩的两性珊瑚群落结构:科学探索的新层面","authors":"J. Kenyon, Casey B. Wilkinson, M. Dunlap, G. Aeby, C. Kryss","doi":"10.5479/SI.00775630.550.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distribution and abundance of scleractinian corals at Laysan Island and Lisianski Island/Neva Shoal in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands were determined by georeferenced towed-diver surveys that covered more than 56,000 m2 of benthic habitat and site-specific surveys at 33 sites during 2000 2004. Three complementary methods (towed-diver surveys, videotransects, and photoquadrats) were used to quantify percent cover of corals by genus or species at each bank and determine relative abundance. Colony counts within belt transects at fixed sites were used to assess colony density and size-class distribution. Significant differences were found between the two banks at comparable depths (7-18 m) in percent coral cover, relative abundance of the three primary genera (Porites, Montipora, and Pocillopora), and size class distributions of these genera. The coral community at Lisianski/Neva Shoal was characterized by higher percent cover, higher colony density, and a tendency towards larger colonies than the coral community at Laysan. Porites was the dominant genus at both locations, but the relative abundance of Pocillopora and Montipora differed between the banks, with Pocillopora more common at Laysan than at Lisianski/Neva Shoal, and Montipora more common at Lisiansksi/Neva Shoal than at Laysan. Notable differences were also found in the distribution of the three primary genera at the two banks. These demographic data are discussed in the context of the known history of exposure of these remote reefs to salient factors influencing the condition of coral communities including marine debris, bleaching, and disease. They provide a detailed baseline of the composition of these shallow-water communities in the early years of the 21st century that will serve as a comparative benchmark for examining long-term change. _____________________________ 1Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research and NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1125B Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96814 USA, Email: Jean.Kenyon@noaa.gov 2Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA 3 3University of Hawaii, 200 3Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720 USA Manuscript received 23 October 2007; revised 09 November 2007.","PeriodicalId":34898,"journal":{"name":"Atoll Research Bulletin","volume":"550 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community structure of hermatypic corals at Layson Island and Lisianski Island/Neva Shoal in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: a new layer of scientific exploration\",\"authors\":\"J. Kenyon, Casey B. Wilkinson, M. Dunlap, G. Aeby, C. Kryss\",\"doi\":\"10.5479/SI.00775630.550.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The distribution and abundance of scleractinian corals at Laysan Island and Lisianski Island/Neva Shoal in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands were determined by georeferenced towed-diver surveys that covered more than 56,000 m2 of benthic habitat and site-specific surveys at 33 sites during 2000 2004. Three complementary methods (towed-diver surveys, videotransects, and photoquadrats) were used to quantify percent cover of corals by genus or species at each bank and determine relative abundance. Colony counts within belt transects at fixed sites were used to assess colony density and size-class distribution. Significant differences were found between the two banks at comparable depths (7-18 m) in percent coral cover, relative abundance of the three primary genera (Porites, Montipora, and Pocillopora), and size class distributions of these genera. The coral community at Lisianski/Neva Shoal was characterized by higher percent cover, higher colony density, and a tendency towards larger colonies than the coral community at Laysan. Porites was the dominant genus at both locations, but the relative abundance of Pocillopora and Montipora differed between the banks, with Pocillopora more common at Laysan than at Lisianski/Neva Shoal, and Montipora more common at Lisiansksi/Neva Shoal than at Laysan. Notable differences were also found in the distribution of the three primary genera at the two banks. These demographic data are discussed in the context of the known history of exposure of these remote reefs to salient factors influencing the condition of coral communities including marine debris, bleaching, and disease. They provide a detailed baseline of the composition of these shallow-water communities in the early years of the 21st century that will serve as a comparative benchmark for examining long-term change. _____________________________ 1Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research and NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1125B Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96814 USA, Email: Jean.Kenyon@noaa.gov 2Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA 3 3University of Hawaii, 200 3Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720 USA Manuscript received 23 October 2007; revised 09 November 2007.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atoll Research Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"550 1\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atoll Research Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5479/SI.00775630.550.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atoll Research Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5479/SI.00775630.550.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
在2000年至2004年期间,在夏威夷群岛西北部的Laysan岛和Lisianski岛/Neva浅滩进行的地理参考拖曳式潜水员调查,覆盖了超过56,000平方米的底栖生物栖息地,并在33个地点进行了特定地点的调查,确定了核状珊瑚的分布和丰富程度。三种互补的方法(拖曳潜水员调查、录像样带和光样方)被用来量化每一岸珊瑚属或物种的覆盖百分比,并确定相对丰度。用固定地点带样内的菌落计数评估菌落密度和大小级分布。在比较深度(7-18 m),两岸的珊瑚覆盖率、三个主要属(Porites、Montipora和Pocillopora)的相对丰度以及这些属的大小分类分布都存在显著差异。与Laysan的珊瑚群落相比,Lisianski/Neva浅滩的珊瑚群落具有更高的覆盖百分比、更高的群落密度和更大的群落趋势。Porites在两个地点都是优势属,但Pocillopora和Montipora的相对丰度在不同的河岸之间存在差异,Pocillopora在Laysan比在Lisianski/Neva浅滩更常见,Montipora在Lisiansksi/Neva浅滩比在Laysan更常见。两家银行的三种主要种类的分布也存在显著差异。这些人口统计数据是在这些偏远珊瑚礁暴露于影响珊瑚群落状况的显着因素(包括海洋垃圾、白化和疾病)的已知历史背景下讨论的。它们提供了21世纪初这些浅水群落组成的详细基线,将作为研究长期变化的比较基准。_____________________________ 1海洋与大气研究所和美国国家海洋和大气管理局太平洋岛屿渔业科学中心,阿拉莫阿纳大道1125B。2夏威夷海洋生物研究所,邮政信箱1346,Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA; 33夏威夷大学,2003kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720 USA。2007年11月9日修订。
Community structure of hermatypic corals at Layson Island and Lisianski Island/Neva Shoal in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: a new layer of scientific exploration
The distribution and abundance of scleractinian corals at Laysan Island and Lisianski Island/Neva Shoal in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands were determined by georeferenced towed-diver surveys that covered more than 56,000 m2 of benthic habitat and site-specific surveys at 33 sites during 2000 2004. Three complementary methods (towed-diver surveys, videotransects, and photoquadrats) were used to quantify percent cover of corals by genus or species at each bank and determine relative abundance. Colony counts within belt transects at fixed sites were used to assess colony density and size-class distribution. Significant differences were found between the two banks at comparable depths (7-18 m) in percent coral cover, relative abundance of the three primary genera (Porites, Montipora, and Pocillopora), and size class distributions of these genera. The coral community at Lisianski/Neva Shoal was characterized by higher percent cover, higher colony density, and a tendency towards larger colonies than the coral community at Laysan. Porites was the dominant genus at both locations, but the relative abundance of Pocillopora and Montipora differed between the banks, with Pocillopora more common at Laysan than at Lisianski/Neva Shoal, and Montipora more common at Lisiansksi/Neva Shoal than at Laysan. Notable differences were also found in the distribution of the three primary genera at the two banks. These demographic data are discussed in the context of the known history of exposure of these remote reefs to salient factors influencing the condition of coral communities including marine debris, bleaching, and disease. They provide a detailed baseline of the composition of these shallow-water communities in the early years of the 21st century that will serve as a comparative benchmark for examining long-term change. _____________________________ 1Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research and NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1125B Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96814 USA, Email: Jean.Kenyon@noaa.gov 2Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA 3 3University of Hawaii, 200 3Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720 USA Manuscript received 23 October 2007; revised 09 November 2007.