由内窥镜专科护士提供的门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备指南优于内窥镜医师提供的指南

Chee K Hui, Kit Hui
{"title":"由内窥镜专科护士提供的门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备指南优于内窥镜医师提供的指南","authors":"Chee K Hui, Kit Hui","doi":"10.47829/jjgh.2021.7701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.3. Results: Four-thousand-eight-hundred-and-seventy-seven subjects (85.0%) were in the Nurse group while 860 subjects (15.0%) were in the Endoscopist group. A total Boston Bowel Preparation Score ≥6 was achieved in 4721 of the 4877 (96.8%) subjects in the Nurse group when compared with 807 of the 860 (93.8%) subjects in the Endoscopist group (p<0.001). A total of 1624 of the 5737 (28.3%) subjects had adenomas on colonoscopy. There was no significant difference in the adenoma detection rate in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [1388/4877 (28.5%) vs. 236/860 (27.4%), p=0.285]. There was also no significant difference in the total number of adenomas detected in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [mean± standard deviation 0.48±1.08 vs. 0.44±1.18, p=0.412].","PeriodicalId":73535,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bowel Preparation Instructions for Outpatient Colonoscopy Delivered by a Specialist Endoscopy Nurse was Superior to That Delivered by an Endoscopist\",\"authors\":\"Chee K Hui, Kit Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.47829/jjgh.2021.7701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1.3. Results: Four-thousand-eight-hundred-and-seventy-seven subjects (85.0%) were in the Nurse group while 860 subjects (15.0%) were in the Endoscopist group. A total Boston Bowel Preparation Score ≥6 was achieved in 4721 of the 4877 (96.8%) subjects in the Nurse group when compared with 807 of the 860 (93.8%) subjects in the Endoscopist group (p<0.001). A total of 1624 of the 5737 (28.3%) subjects had adenomas on colonoscopy. There was no significant difference in the adenoma detection rate in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [1388/4877 (28.5%) vs. 236/860 (27.4%), p=0.285]. There was also no significant difference in the total number of adenomas detected in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [mean± standard deviation 0.48±1.08 vs. 0.44±1.18, p=0.412].\",\"PeriodicalId\":73535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of gastroenterology and hepatology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of gastroenterology and hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47829/jjgh.2021.7701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47829/jjgh.2021.7701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1.3. 结果:护理组4877例(85.0%),内镜组860例(15.0%)。4877名护士组受试者中有4721名(96.8%)波士顿肠道准备评分≥6分,而内镜组860名受试者中有807名(93.8%)波士顿肠道准备评分≥6分(p<0.001)。5737例受试者中有1624例(28.3%)结肠镜检查时发现腺瘤。护士组腺瘤检出率与内镜组比较差异无统计学意义[1388/4877(28.5%)比236/860 (27.4%),p=0.285]。与内镜组相比,护理组的腺瘤总数也无显著差异[平均值±标准差0.48±1.08比0.44±1.18,p=0.412]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bowel Preparation Instructions for Outpatient Colonoscopy Delivered by a Specialist Endoscopy Nurse was Superior to That Delivered by an Endoscopist
1.3. Results: Four-thousand-eight-hundred-and-seventy-seven subjects (85.0%) were in the Nurse group while 860 subjects (15.0%) were in the Endoscopist group. A total Boston Bowel Preparation Score ≥6 was achieved in 4721 of the 4877 (96.8%) subjects in the Nurse group when compared with 807 of the 860 (93.8%) subjects in the Endoscopist group (p<0.001). A total of 1624 of the 5737 (28.3%) subjects had adenomas on colonoscopy. There was no significant difference in the adenoma detection rate in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [1388/4877 (28.5%) vs. 236/860 (27.4%), p=0.285]. There was also no significant difference in the total number of adenomas detected in the Nurse group when compared with the Endoscopist group [mean± standard deviation 0.48±1.08 vs. 0.44±1.18, p=0.412].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信