港口运营商供应链一体化发展的障碍:一个发展中国家的评价

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Murilo Branco, Rafael Teixeira, Saif U. Mir, D. P. Lacerda
{"title":"港口运营商供应链一体化发展的障碍:一个发展中国家的评价","authors":"Murilo Branco, Rafael Teixeira, Saif U. Mir, D. P. Lacerda","doi":"10.5325/TRANSPORTATIONJ.60.2.0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this multimethod research, we build on the customer portfolio literature to theorize a two-dimensional matrix between the strategic importance of a port operator's customers and the customers' perceptions of the port operator's supply chain integration (SCI). The matrix highlights two mismatches: (1) important customers do not perceive a high degree of port operator SCI; and (2) low-importance customers perceive a high degree of port operator SCI. In the former, the port operator's investments are wasted, while in the latter the port operator reaps benefits from minimal investments. In our first study, we classify 1,441 customers of a Brazilian port operator into three levels of strategic importance: high, medium, and low. A survey instrument sent to these customers measured the perceived port operators' SCI by 210 customers, and the analysis revealed a mismatch for 76 percent of the companies. The second study examines the reasons for the mismatch. Semi-structured interviews highlighted that the perceived unfairness of the port operator's operational decision making and negative experiences with other supply chain members negatively affected the SCI perceptions of customers. We also found a spill-over effect: low-importance customers perceived a high level of SCI due to the port operator's operational investments in its important customers.","PeriodicalId":46529,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"141 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the Development of Port Operator Supply Chain Integration: An Evaluation in a Developing Country\",\"authors\":\"Murilo Branco, Rafael Teixeira, Saif U. Mir, D. P. Lacerda\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/TRANSPORTATIONJ.60.2.0141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this multimethod research, we build on the customer portfolio literature to theorize a two-dimensional matrix between the strategic importance of a port operator's customers and the customers' perceptions of the port operator's supply chain integration (SCI). The matrix highlights two mismatches: (1) important customers do not perceive a high degree of port operator SCI; and (2) low-importance customers perceive a high degree of port operator SCI. In the former, the port operator's investments are wasted, while in the latter the port operator reaps benefits from minimal investments. In our first study, we classify 1,441 customers of a Brazilian port operator into three levels of strategic importance: high, medium, and low. A survey instrument sent to these customers measured the perceived port operators' SCI by 210 customers, and the analysis revealed a mismatch for 76 percent of the companies. The second study examines the reasons for the mismatch. Semi-structured interviews highlighted that the perceived unfairness of the port operator's operational decision making and negative experiences with other supply chain members negatively affected the SCI perceptions of customers. We also found a spill-over effect: low-importance customers perceived a high level of SCI due to the port operator's operational investments in its important customers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/TRANSPORTATIONJ.60.2.0141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/TRANSPORTATIONJ.60.2.0141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:在这项多方法研究中,我们在客户组合文献的基础上,建立了港口运营商客户战略重要性与客户对港口运营商供应链整合(SCI)的感知之间的二维矩阵。矩阵突出了两个不匹配:(1)重要客户对港口运营商SCI的感知程度不高;(2)低重要性客户对港口经营者SCI的感知程度较高。在前者中,港口运营商的投资是浪费的,而在后者中,港口运营商从最小的投资中获益。在我们的第一项研究中,我们将一家巴西港口运营商的1441名客户分为三个战略重要性级别:高、中、低。发送给这些客户的一项调查工具测量了210名客户对港口运营商SCI的感知,分析显示76%的公司不匹配。第二项研究考察了这种不匹配的原因。半结构化访谈强调,港口运营商运营决策的不公平以及与其他供应链成员的负面经历对客户对SCI的看法产生了负面影响。我们还发现了溢出效应:由于港口运营商对其重要客户的运营投资,低重要性客户感知到高水平的SCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to the Development of Port Operator Supply Chain Integration: An Evaluation in a Developing Country
Abstract:In this multimethod research, we build on the customer portfolio literature to theorize a two-dimensional matrix between the strategic importance of a port operator's customers and the customers' perceptions of the port operator's supply chain integration (SCI). The matrix highlights two mismatches: (1) important customers do not perceive a high degree of port operator SCI; and (2) low-importance customers perceive a high degree of port operator SCI. In the former, the port operator's investments are wasted, while in the latter the port operator reaps benefits from minimal investments. In our first study, we classify 1,441 customers of a Brazilian port operator into three levels of strategic importance: high, medium, and low. A survey instrument sent to these customers measured the perceived port operators' SCI by 210 customers, and the analysis revealed a mismatch for 76 percent of the companies. The second study examines the reasons for the mismatch. Semi-structured interviews highlighted that the perceived unfairness of the port operator's operational decision making and negative experiences with other supply chain members negatively affected the SCI perceptions of customers. We also found a spill-over effect: low-importance customers perceived a high level of SCI due to the port operator's operational investments in its important customers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Transportation Journal is devoted to the publication of articles that present new knowledge relating to all sectors of the supply chain/logistics/transportation field. These sectors include supply chain/logistics management strategies and techniques; carrier (transport firm) and contract logistics firm (3PL and 4PL) management strategies and techniques; transport economics; regulation, promotion, and other dimensions of public policy toward transport and logistics; and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信