{"title":"苏联的心理技术:艾萨克·斯皮勒林和第七届莫斯科国际心理技术大会(1931年)。","authors":"H. Carpintero","doi":"10.5093/rhp2019a14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente trabajo examina las ideas sobre psicotecnia de I. Spielrein, figura central en esa especialidad en la Union Sovietica, entre la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y especialmente su intervencion en el 7o Congreso Internacional de Psicotecnia de Moscu, en 1931, donde confronto la doctrina marxista con la mantenida por especialistas de la Europa democratica de la epoca. Alli afirmo el caracter socio historico del hombre, en oposicion a la concepcion naturalista y biologicista dominante en las sociedades capitalistas, asi como el uso de la psicotecnia en esas naciones como obstaculo que impedia el ascenso del proletariado al poder social detentado por la burguesia. EnglishThis article deals with I. Spielrein’s ideas on psychotechnology. He was a Soviet leading figure in that field, in the days in between the two great wars, and chaired the 7th International Congress of Psychotechnology held in Moscow in 1931.In it he confronted the Marxist doctrine with that maintained by specialist of the democratic European nations. He affirmed the socio-historical character of man, as opposed to the dominant naturalist and biologist conception that dominated in capitalist societies, as well as the use of psychotechnics in those nations as an obstacle to the rise of proletariat to social power, facing the bourgeoisie.","PeriodicalId":82492,"journal":{"name":"Revista de historia de la psicologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La psicotecnia en la URSS: Isaac Spielrein y el VII Congreso Internacional de Psicotecnia de Moscú (1931).\",\"authors\":\"H. Carpintero\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/rhp2019a14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEl presente trabajo examina las ideas sobre psicotecnia de I. Spielrein, figura central en esa especialidad en la Union Sovietica, entre la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y especialmente su intervencion en el 7o Congreso Internacional de Psicotecnia de Moscu, en 1931, donde confronto la doctrina marxista con la mantenida por especialistas de la Europa democratica de la epoca. Alli afirmo el caracter socio historico del hombre, en oposicion a la concepcion naturalista y biologicista dominante en las sociedades capitalistas, asi como el uso de la psicotecnia en esas naciones como obstaculo que impedia el ascenso del proletariado al poder social detentado por la burguesia. EnglishThis article deals with I. Spielrein’s ideas on psychotechnology. He was a Soviet leading figure in that field, in the days in between the two great wars, and chaired the 7th International Congress of Psychotechnology held in Moscow in 1931.In it he confronted the Marxist doctrine with that maintained by specialist of the democratic European nations. He affirmed the socio-historical character of man, as opposed to the dominant naturalist and biologist conception that dominated in capitalist societies, as well as the use of psychotechnics in those nations as an obstacle to the rise of proletariat to social power, facing the bourgeoisie.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de historia de la psicologia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de historia de la psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/rhp2019a14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de historia de la psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/rhp2019a14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
espanolEl本工作审查了i . Spielrein psicotecnia想法,中心人物之间的联合苏联,该专业在第一次和第二次世界大战后,特别是诺在7o届莫斯科国际psicotecnia, 1931年,confronto马克思主义学说与维持专家欧洲民主的时候。在这里,我主张人类的社会历史特征,反对资本主义社会中占主导地位的自然主义和生物主义概念,以及在这些国家中使用心理技术作为阻碍无产阶级上升到资产阶级所掌握的社会权力的障碍。这篇文章讨论了I. Spielrein关于心理技术的想法。我was a Soviet导致列出in that field in the days in between the two great战争,和由,International Congress of Psychotechnology》1931年在莫斯科举行。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。他主张人的社会历史特征,反对在资本主义社会中占主导地位的博物学家和生物学家的概念,以及在这些国家中使用心理技术作为无产阶级崛起到社会权力的障碍,反对资产阶级。
La psicotecnia en la URSS: Isaac Spielrein y el VII Congreso Internacional de Psicotecnia de Moscú (1931).
espanolEl presente trabajo examina las ideas sobre psicotecnia de I. Spielrein, figura central en esa especialidad en la Union Sovietica, entre la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y especialmente su intervencion en el 7o Congreso Internacional de Psicotecnia de Moscu, en 1931, donde confronto la doctrina marxista con la mantenida por especialistas de la Europa democratica de la epoca. Alli afirmo el caracter socio historico del hombre, en oposicion a la concepcion naturalista y biologicista dominante en las sociedades capitalistas, asi como el uso de la psicotecnia en esas naciones como obstaculo que impedia el ascenso del proletariado al poder social detentado por la burguesia. EnglishThis article deals with I. Spielrein’s ideas on psychotechnology. He was a Soviet leading figure in that field, in the days in between the two great wars, and chaired the 7th International Congress of Psychotechnology held in Moscow in 1931.In it he confronted the Marxist doctrine with that maintained by specialist of the democratic European nations. He affirmed the socio-historical character of man, as opposed to the dominant naturalist and biologist conception that dominated in capitalist societies, as well as the use of psychotechnics in those nations as an obstacle to the rise of proletariat to social power, facing the bourgeoisie.