构建印尼禽流感神经氨酸酶突变体及同源蛋白结构预测

S. Herlambang, R. Saleh
{"title":"构建印尼禽流感神经氨酸酶突变体及同源蛋白结构预测","authors":"S. Herlambang, R. Saleh","doi":"10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein structure modeling using a homologous template is one of many routines that accompany the molecular dynamics simulation for biological material. There are currently two protocols of protein modeling available in Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1, Build Mutants and Build Homology Modeling protocols. Both are template-based modeling, but with a different process. In this study, two different templates, 3CKZ and 274Y, have been used to see how much the differences will be made by those two protocols if the templates has significant percentage of identity. Evaluation of structure models has been performed using DOPE score, 3D-profile, and PROCHECK. The results indicated that Build Mutants Protocols produces more stable structures but has a low reliability values and low quality of stereochemistry when using a template that has a lower percentage of identity. The results also yield more stable, reliable, and higher percentage of residues in most favoured and additionally allowed region for the usage of Build Homology Modeling Protocol on both templates. These observations suggest that Build Homology Modeling protocol is recommended for protein modeling.","PeriodicalId":62927,"journal":{"name":"生物物理化学(英文)","volume":"3 1","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Build mutant and build homology protein structure predictions for indonesian avian influenza neuraminidase\",\"authors\":\"S. Herlambang, R. Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protein structure modeling using a homologous template is one of many routines that accompany the molecular dynamics simulation for biological material. There are currently two protocols of protein modeling available in Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1, Build Mutants and Build Homology Modeling protocols. Both are template-based modeling, but with a different process. In this study, two different templates, 3CKZ and 274Y, have been used to see how much the differences will be made by those two protocols if the templates has significant percentage of identity. Evaluation of structure models has been performed using DOPE score, 3D-profile, and PROCHECK. The results indicated that Build Mutants Protocols produces more stable structures but has a low reliability values and low quality of stereochemistry when using a template that has a lower percentage of identity. The results also yield more stable, reliable, and higher percentage of residues in most favoured and additionally allowed region for the usage of Build Homology Modeling Protocol on both templates. These observations suggest that Build Homology Modeling protocol is recommended for protein modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":62927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生物物理化学(英文)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"183-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生物物理化学(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物物理化学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

使用同源模板的蛋白质结构建模是伴随生物材料分子动力学模拟的许多例程之一。目前在Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1中有两种蛋白质建模协议,构建突变体和构建同源建模协议。两者都是基于模板的建模,但是过程不同。在本研究中,使用了两个不同的模板,3CKZ和274Y,以查看如果模板具有显著的身份百分比,这两个协议将产生多大的差异。使用DOPE评分、3D-profile和PROCHECK对结构模型进行了评估。结果表明,构建突变体协议产生更稳定的结构,但具有较低的可靠性值和低的立体化学质量,当使用的模板具有较低的同一性百分比。结果还产生了更稳定、可靠和更高的残基百分比,在最有利的区域和额外允许的区域,在两个模板上使用构建同源建模协议。这些观察结果表明,构建同源建模协议是推荐的蛋白质建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Build mutant and build homology protein structure predictions for indonesian avian influenza neuraminidase
Protein structure modeling using a homologous template is one of many routines that accompany the molecular dynamics simulation for biological material. There are currently two protocols of protein modeling available in Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1, Build Mutants and Build Homology Modeling protocols. Both are template-based modeling, but with a different process. In this study, two different templates, 3CKZ and 274Y, have been used to see how much the differences will be made by those two protocols if the templates has significant percentage of identity. Evaluation of structure models has been performed using DOPE score, 3D-profile, and PROCHECK. The results indicated that Build Mutants Protocols produces more stable structures but has a low reliability values and low quality of stereochemistry when using a template that has a lower percentage of identity. The results also yield more stable, reliable, and higher percentage of residues in most favoured and additionally allowed region for the usage of Build Homology Modeling Protocol on both templates. These observations suggest that Build Homology Modeling protocol is recommended for protein modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信