{"title":"混合时间序列截面数据的模型","authors":"Lawrence E. Raffalovich, Rakkoo Chung","doi":"10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several models are available for the analysis of pooled time-series cross-section (TSCS) data, defined as “repeated observations on fixed units” (Beck and Katz 1995). In this paper, we run the following models: (1) a completely pooled model, (2) fixed effects models, and (3) multi-level/hierarchical linear models. To illustrate these models, we use a Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator with cross-section weights and panel-corrected standard errors (with EViews 8) on the cross-national homicide trends data of forty countries from 1950 to 2005, which we source from published research (Messner et al. 2011). We describe and discuss the similarities and differences between the models, and what information each can contribute to help answer substantive research questions. We conclude with a discussion of how the models we present may help to mitigate validity threats inherent in pooled time-series cross-section data analysis.","PeriodicalId":45781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"8 1","pages":"209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models for Pooled Time-Series Cross-Section Data\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence E. Raffalovich, Rakkoo Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several models are available for the analysis of pooled time-series cross-section (TSCS) data, defined as “repeated observations on fixed units” (Beck and Katz 1995). In this paper, we run the following models: (1) a completely pooled model, (2) fixed effects models, and (3) multi-level/hierarchical linear models. To illustrate these models, we use a Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator with cross-section weights and panel-corrected standard errors (with EViews 8) on the cross-national homicide trends data of forty countries from 1950 to 2005, which we source from published research (Messner et al. 2011). We describe and discuss the similarities and differences between the models, and what information each can contribute to help answer substantive research questions. We conclude with a discussion of how the models we present may help to mitigate validity threats inherent in pooled time-series cross-section data analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"209-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
有几种模型可用于分析集合时间序列横截面(TSCS)数据,这些数据被定义为“固定单位上的重复观测”(Beck和Katz 1995)。在本文中,我们运行了以下模型:(1)一个完全池模型,(2)固定效应模型,(3)多层次/层次线性模型。为了说明这些模型,我们对1950年至2005年40个国家的跨国杀人趋势数据使用了具有横截面权重和面板校正标准误差(使用EViews 8)的广义最小二乘(GLS)估计器,这些数据来自已发表的研究(Messner et al. 2011)。我们描述和讨论模型之间的异同,以及每个模型可以提供哪些信息来帮助回答实质性的研究问题。最后,我们讨论了我们提出的模型如何有助于减轻合并时间序列横截面数据分析中固有的有效性威胁。
Several models are available for the analysis of pooled time-series cross-section (TSCS) data, defined as “repeated observations on fixed units” (Beck and Katz 1995). In this paper, we run the following models: (1) a completely pooled model, (2) fixed effects models, and (3) multi-level/hierarchical linear models. To illustrate these models, we use a Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator with cross-section weights and panel-corrected standard errors (with EViews 8) on the cross-national homicide trends data of forty countries from 1950 to 2005, which we source from published research (Messner et al. 2011). We describe and discuss the similarities and differences between the models, and what information each can contribute to help answer substantive research questions. We conclude with a discussion of how the models we present may help to mitigate validity threats inherent in pooled time-series cross-section data analysis.