抗贝伐单抗的老年性黄斑变性(AMD)患者改用阿非利塞普治疗的进展和结果

Arturo Alberto Alezz, Rini, P. Barberis, M. Tammaro, Mara Belen Garca
{"title":"抗贝伐单抗的老年性黄斑变性(AMD)患者改用阿非利塞普治疗的进展和结果","authors":"Arturo Alberto Alezz, Rini, P. Barberis, M. Tammaro, Mara Belen Garca","doi":"10.4172/2324-8599.1000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Aflibercept in patients with age-related macular degeneration who had received prior treatment with Bevacizumab. \nMaterial & Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in “Oftalmos, Centro Oftalmologico de Alta Complejidad”. We reviewed the clinical records of 41 eyes that had received at least three (3) intravitreal injections of Bevacizumab (1.25 mg) with a period no longer than 4 weeks between each application, prior switch to Aflibercept (2 mg). Of the selected patients, 27 had a diagnosis of choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), 5 had CNVM associated with neuroepithelium detachment and the remaining 9 eyes only had retinal pigment epithelium detachment (RPED). Rotation of anti-VEGF was due to the persistence or increase in central macular thickness observed in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). All patients received a loading dose of three intravitreal 2 mg Aflibercept injections at 4-week intervals. Evaluation included central macular thickness and maximum pigment epithelium (PED) height measured by spectral domain OCT and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) prior to the switch of therapy and 4 weeks after the last Aflibercept injection. \nResults: A significant decrease in central macular thickness in spectral domain OCT (= or > 50 μm) was observed in 18 eyes (43.9%). In 17 eyes (41.46%) no changes in thickness were observed after the switch. In the remaining 6 eyes (14.63%) increased thickness was appreciated. There was an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (= or>4 letters) in 22 patients (53.65%) while 15 (36.5%) maintained the same BCVA and the remaining 4 (9.75%) lost one line. \nDiscussion: Recent publications suggest that the use of Aflibercept in patients with AMD that do not have satisfactory response to treatment with Bevacizumab, could present better results. Despitethis, they have not yet obtained scientifically significant results. However, it is important to emphasize that both drugs have different mechanisms of action. \nConclusion: Although the number of patients, who had improved with the switch to Aflibercept, is not statistically significant, the rotation of antiangiogenic is a valid option in the absence of response.","PeriodicalId":89944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","volume":"2015 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress and Outcome of Therapeutic Switch to Aflibercept in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Resistant to Bevacizumab\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Alberto Alezz, Rini, P. Barberis, M. Tammaro, Mara Belen Garca\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2324-8599.1000170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Aflibercept in patients with age-related macular degeneration who had received prior treatment with Bevacizumab. \\nMaterial & Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in “Oftalmos, Centro Oftalmologico de Alta Complejidad”. We reviewed the clinical records of 41 eyes that had received at least three (3) intravitreal injections of Bevacizumab (1.25 mg) with a period no longer than 4 weeks between each application, prior switch to Aflibercept (2 mg). Of the selected patients, 27 had a diagnosis of choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), 5 had CNVM associated with neuroepithelium detachment and the remaining 9 eyes only had retinal pigment epithelium detachment (RPED). Rotation of anti-VEGF was due to the persistence or increase in central macular thickness observed in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). All patients received a loading dose of three intravitreal 2 mg Aflibercept injections at 4-week intervals. Evaluation included central macular thickness and maximum pigment epithelium (PED) height measured by spectral domain OCT and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) prior to the switch of therapy and 4 weeks after the last Aflibercept injection. \\nResults: A significant decrease in central macular thickness in spectral domain OCT (= or > 50 μm) was observed in 18 eyes (43.9%). In 17 eyes (41.46%) no changes in thickness were observed after the switch. In the remaining 6 eyes (14.63%) increased thickness was appreciated. There was an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (= or>4 letters) in 22 patients (53.65%) while 15 (36.5%) maintained the same BCVA and the remaining 4 (9.75%) lost one line. \\nDiscussion: Recent publications suggest that the use of Aflibercept in patients with AMD that do not have satisfactory response to treatment with Bevacizumab, could present better results. Despitethis, they have not yet obtained scientifically significant results. However, it is important to emphasize that both drugs have different mechanisms of action. \\nConclusion: Although the number of patients, who had improved with the switch to Aflibercept, is not statistically significant, the rotation of antiangiogenic is a valid option in the absence of response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估afliberept对既往接受贝伐单抗治疗的老年性黄斑变性患者的疗效。材料与方法:在“Oftalmos, Centro Oftalmologico de Alta Complejidad”进行了一项观察性回顾性研究。我们回顾了41只眼睛的临床记录,这些眼睛接受了至少三(3)次贝伐单抗(1.25 mg)玻璃体内注射,每次注射间隔不超过4周,然后切换到Aflibercept (2 mg)。其中27例诊断为脉络膜新生血管膜(CNVM), 5例诊断为CNVM合并神经上皮脱离,其余9例仅诊断为视网膜色素上皮脱离(RPED)。抗vegf的旋转是由于光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)观察到黄斑中央厚度的持续或增加。所有患者每隔4周接受3次玻璃体内2mg阿非利西普注射。评估包括转换治疗前和最后一次注射阿非利西普后4周,光谱域OCT测量的黄斑中央厚度和最大色素上皮(PED)高度和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。结果:18眼(43.9%)黄斑中央厚度在光谱域(=或bbb50 μm)明显降低。17只(41.46%)眼的厚度未见改变。其余6眼(14.63%)厚度增加。最佳矫正视力改善22例(53.65%),BCVA维持不变15例(36.5%),其余4例(9.75%)丧失1行。讨论:最近的出版物表明,使用afliberept治疗对贝伐单抗治疗反应不满意的AMD患者可能会有更好的结果。尽管如此,他们尚未获得具有科学意义的结果。然而,重要的是要强调这两种药物具有不同的作用机制。结论:虽然切换到阿非利西普后改善的患者数量没有统计学意义,但在没有反应的情况下,旋转抗血管生成是一种有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress and Outcome of Therapeutic Switch to Aflibercept in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Resistant to Bevacizumab
Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Aflibercept in patients with age-related macular degeneration who had received prior treatment with Bevacizumab. Material & Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in “Oftalmos, Centro Oftalmologico de Alta Complejidad”. We reviewed the clinical records of 41 eyes that had received at least three (3) intravitreal injections of Bevacizumab (1.25 mg) with a period no longer than 4 weeks between each application, prior switch to Aflibercept (2 mg). Of the selected patients, 27 had a diagnosis of choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), 5 had CNVM associated with neuroepithelium detachment and the remaining 9 eyes only had retinal pigment epithelium detachment (RPED). Rotation of anti-VEGF was due to the persistence or increase in central macular thickness observed in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). All patients received a loading dose of three intravitreal 2 mg Aflibercept injections at 4-week intervals. Evaluation included central macular thickness and maximum pigment epithelium (PED) height measured by spectral domain OCT and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) prior to the switch of therapy and 4 weeks after the last Aflibercept injection. Results: A significant decrease in central macular thickness in spectral domain OCT (= or > 50 μm) was observed in 18 eyes (43.9%). In 17 eyes (41.46%) no changes in thickness were observed after the switch. In the remaining 6 eyes (14.63%) increased thickness was appreciated. There was an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (= or>4 letters) in 22 patients (53.65%) while 15 (36.5%) maintained the same BCVA and the remaining 4 (9.75%) lost one line. Discussion: Recent publications suggest that the use of Aflibercept in patients with AMD that do not have satisfactory response to treatment with Bevacizumab, could present better results. Despitethis, they have not yet obtained scientifically significant results. However, it is important to emphasize that both drugs have different mechanisms of action. Conclusion: Although the number of patients, who had improved with the switch to Aflibercept, is not statistically significant, the rotation of antiangiogenic is a valid option in the absence of response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信