《地方政府:市政制度法》第118条规定的市政当局在征收土地方面的权利

Q3 Social Sciences
Chantelle Gladwin-Wood, R. Brits
{"title":"《地方政府:市政制度法》第118条规定的市政当局在征收土地方面的权利","authors":"Chantelle Gladwin-Wood, R. Brits","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the impact of s 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 on the rights of a municipality when land in its jurisdiction is expropriated. First, the municipality’s right under s 118(1) to embargo the transfer of a property, until it has been paid all amounts owing for the two years prior to transfer, might be undermined by a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 in so far as the Act provides that the expropriating authority ‘may’ (not must) pay the amounts due to the municipality concerned. We argue that a broader and more purposeful interpretation of not only the Expropriation Act but also the Expropriation Bill B23-2020 ought to be adopted, in order to assist municipalities in collecting debts owed to them. Secondly, we argue that a municipality’s security right under s 118(3) constitutes an unregistered right in land and, although the right is not protected under the current Expropriation Act, it will be protected if the provisions of the Expropriation Bill come into force, with the result that even if nil compensation is payable to the expropriated owner, the expropriating authority ought to compensate the municipality.","PeriodicalId":39313,"journal":{"name":"South African law journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rights of municipalities under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act in the case of land expropriation\",\"authors\":\"Chantelle Gladwin-Wood, R. Brits\",\"doi\":\"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the impact of s 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 on the rights of a municipality when land in its jurisdiction is expropriated. First, the municipality’s right under s 118(1) to embargo the transfer of a property, until it has been paid all amounts owing for the two years prior to transfer, might be undermined by a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 in so far as the Act provides that the expropriating authority ‘may’ (not must) pay the amounts due to the municipality concerned. We argue that a broader and more purposeful interpretation of not only the Expropriation Act but also the Expropriation Bill B23-2020 ought to be adopted, in order to assist municipalities in collecting debts owed to them. Secondly, we argue that a municipality’s security right under s 118(3) constitutes an unregistered right in land and, although the right is not protected under the current Expropriation Act, it will be protected if the provisions of the Expropriation Bill come into force, with the result that even if nil compensation is payable to the expropriated owner, the expropriating authority ought to compensate the municipality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African law journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i2a5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i2a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了2000年《地方政府:市政制度法》第32条第118条对市政当局在其管辖范围内的土地被征收时的权利的影响。首先,市政当局根据第118(1)条禁止转让财产的权利,直到转让前两年的所有欠款都已支付,这可能会被1975年第63号《征收法》条款的字面解释所破坏,因为该法规定征收当局“可以”(而不是必须)支付有关市政当局应得的款项。我们认为,不仅应该对《征收法》,而且应该对《征收法案B23-2020》进行更广泛和更有目的的解释,以帮助市政当局收取欠他们的债务。其次,我们认为,根据第118(3)条,市政当局的担保权构成了一项未登记的土地权利,尽管该权利不受现行《征收法案》的保护,但如果《征收法案》的规定生效,它将受到保护,其结果是,即使不向被征收的所有者支付任何补偿,征收当局也应该补偿市政当局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The rights of municipalities under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act in the case of land expropriation
This article analyses the impact of s 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 on the rights of a municipality when land in its jurisdiction is expropriated. First, the municipality’s right under s 118(1) to embargo the transfer of a property, until it has been paid all amounts owing for the two years prior to transfer, might be undermined by a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 in so far as the Act provides that the expropriating authority ‘may’ (not must) pay the amounts due to the municipality concerned. We argue that a broader and more purposeful interpretation of not only the Expropriation Act but also the Expropriation Bill B23-2020 ought to be adopted, in order to assist municipalities in collecting debts owed to them. Secondly, we argue that a municipality’s security right under s 118(3) constitutes an unregistered right in land and, although the right is not protected under the current Expropriation Act, it will be protected if the provisions of the Expropriation Bill come into force, with the result that even if nil compensation is payable to the expropriated owner, the expropriating authority ought to compensate the municipality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African law journal
South African law journal Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信