口头评估;牙科本科课程教师的知识和认知

V. D. Puttalingaiah, Poonam Agarwal
{"title":"口头评估;牙科本科课程教师的知识和认知","authors":"V. D. Puttalingaiah, Poonam Agarwal","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20190430105713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Medical education globally constitute formative and summative assessments. Oral examination is an integral part of assessment used to assess various learning domains, conventional oral assessment has been criticized for its reliability and validity. So with the changing trends, emphasis is given on structured oral assessments (SOE). The aim of this study is to know the knowledge and perception of faculty on oral assessments. Methods: A cross sectional questionnaire was designed, and faculty members of dentistry program participated. Result and statistical analysis: A total of n=45 faculty members participated in survey. Descriptive data was presented in the form of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Independent sample t test was used to compare the response scores between the genders. Chi square test was used to test the association between the gender and study responses. Conclusion: Structured oral assessment was the most preferred type, but time and student willingness was the major barriers. All five domains of Bloom’s taxonomy along with knowledge and interpersonal skills can be successfully assessed by SOE. There is a need for periodic faculty workshops to help them implement the newer trends in teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"10 1","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program\",\"authors\":\"V. D. Puttalingaiah, Poonam Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jcme.20190430105713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Medical education globally constitute formative and summative assessments. Oral examination is an integral part of assessment used to assess various learning domains, conventional oral assessment has been criticized for its reliability and validity. So with the changing trends, emphasis is given on structured oral assessments (SOE). The aim of this study is to know the knowledge and perception of faculty on oral assessments. Methods: A cross sectional questionnaire was designed, and faculty members of dentistry program participated. Result and statistical analysis: A total of n=45 faculty members participated in survey. Descriptive data was presented in the form of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Independent sample t test was used to compare the response scores between the genders. Chi square test was used to test the association between the gender and study responses. Conclusion: Structured oral assessment was the most preferred type, but time and student willingness was the major barriers. All five domains of Bloom’s taxonomy along with knowledge and interpersonal skills can be successfully assessed by SOE. There is a need for periodic faculty workshops to help them implement the newer trends in teaching and learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"66-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190430105713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190430105713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:全球医学教育构成形成性评估和总结性评估。口语考试是评估的重要组成部分,用于评估各个学习领域,传统的口语评估因其信度和效度而受到批评。因此,随着变化的趋势,重点是结构化口头评估(SOE)。本研究的目的是了解教师对口头评估的认知和感知。方法:采用横断面调查问卷,对口腔医学专业教师进行问卷调查。结果与统计分析:共有n=45名教师参与调查。描述性数据以频率、百分比、平均值和标准差的形式呈现。采用独立样本t检验比较性别间的应答得分。使用卡方检验来检验性别与研究反应之间的相关性。结论:结构化口头评估是最受欢迎的评估方式,但时间和学生意愿是主要障碍。Bloom分类法的所有五个领域以及知识和人际关系技能都可以通过SOE成功地进行评估。有必要定期举办教师研讨会,以帮助他们实施教学和学习的新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
Objective: Medical education globally constitute formative and summative assessments. Oral examination is an integral part of assessment used to assess various learning domains, conventional oral assessment has been criticized for its reliability and validity. So with the changing trends, emphasis is given on structured oral assessments (SOE). The aim of this study is to know the knowledge and perception of faculty on oral assessments. Methods: A cross sectional questionnaire was designed, and faculty members of dentistry program participated. Result and statistical analysis: A total of n=45 faculty members participated in survey. Descriptive data was presented in the form of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Independent sample t test was used to compare the response scores between the genders. Chi square test was used to test the association between the gender and study responses. Conclusion: Structured oral assessment was the most preferred type, but time and student willingness was the major barriers. All five domains of Bloom’s taxonomy along with knowledge and interpersonal skills can be successfully assessed by SOE. There is a need for periodic faculty workshops to help them implement the newer trends in teaching and learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信