翻转开关:在临床推理教学中运用大声思考翻转课堂方法的可行性

R. Strowd, C. Gamaldo, Anthony B. Kwan, Tiana E. Cruz, R. Salas
{"title":"翻转开关:在临床推理教学中运用大声思考翻转课堂方法的可行性","authors":"R. Strowd, C. Gamaldo, Anthony B. Kwan, Tiana E. Cruz, R. Salas","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20160516010954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical reasoning is a fundamental skill in medical and allied health professions. Implementation of the evidence-based “think aloud” method (i.e. describing cognitive processes through verbalization) for teaching clinical reasoning has been variable due to time and resource constraints in healthcare education. Materials & Methods: To explore the feasibility of implementing the think aloud method for teaching clinical reasoning, we piloted a flipped-classroom model of instruction to free live-synchronous educational time in a medical school clerkship. Two asynchronous web-based videos were implemented prior to synchronous case-based discussion applying the think aloud method. Performance was assessed by baseline and end-of-clerkship examination and NBME shelf exam; clinical skills by clinical evaluation; satisfaction and student learning styles by survey. Results: The flipped-curriculum was piloted in 38 students; mean age 25+2.2 years; 63% male. Baseline knowledge was low (mean baseline score 43+21%) and improved significantly (mean final score 70+23%; increase 29%, 95%CI 20-37%, p","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"33 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flipping the switch: The feasibility of a think aloud flipped-classroom approach to clinical reasoning instruction\",\"authors\":\"R. Strowd, C. Gamaldo, Anthony B. Kwan, Tiana E. Cruz, R. Salas\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JCME.20160516010954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clinical reasoning is a fundamental skill in medical and allied health professions. Implementation of the evidence-based “think aloud” method (i.e. describing cognitive processes through verbalization) for teaching clinical reasoning has been variable due to time and resource constraints in healthcare education. Materials & Methods: To explore the feasibility of implementing the think aloud method for teaching clinical reasoning, we piloted a flipped-classroom model of instruction to free live-synchronous educational time in a medical school clerkship. Two asynchronous web-based videos were implemented prior to synchronous case-based discussion applying the think aloud method. Performance was assessed by baseline and end-of-clerkship examination and NBME shelf exam; clinical skills by clinical evaluation; satisfaction and student learning styles by survey. Results: The flipped-curriculum was piloted in 38 students; mean age 25+2.2 years; 63% male. Baseline knowledge was low (mean baseline score 43+21%) and improved significantly (mean final score 70+23%; increase 29%, 95%CI 20-37%, p\",\"PeriodicalId\":90586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"40-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20160516010954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20160516010954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:临床推理是医疗和相关卫生专业的一项基本技能。由于医疗保健教育的时间和资源限制,临床推理教学中基于证据的“大声思考”方法(即通过语言描述认知过程)的实施一直存在变数。材料与方法:为探索在临床推理教学中实施有声思维教学法的可行性,我们在一所医学院实习中试点了一种翻转课堂教学模式,以腾出实时同步教学时间。在应用出声思考方法进行同步基于案例的讨论之前,实现了两个基于web的异步视频。通过基线、终职考试和NBME货架考试评估绩效;临床技能考核;满意度与学生学习风格的调查。结果:38名学生参与了翻转课程试点;平均年龄25岁+2.2岁;63%的男性。基线知识较低(平均基线得分43+21%),显著改善(平均最终得分70+23%;增加29%,95%CI 20-37%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flipping the switch: The feasibility of a think aloud flipped-classroom approach to clinical reasoning instruction
Background: Clinical reasoning is a fundamental skill in medical and allied health professions. Implementation of the evidence-based “think aloud” method (i.e. describing cognitive processes through verbalization) for teaching clinical reasoning has been variable due to time and resource constraints in healthcare education. Materials & Methods: To explore the feasibility of implementing the think aloud method for teaching clinical reasoning, we piloted a flipped-classroom model of instruction to free live-synchronous educational time in a medical school clerkship. Two asynchronous web-based videos were implemented prior to synchronous case-based discussion applying the think aloud method. Performance was assessed by baseline and end-of-clerkship examination and NBME shelf exam; clinical skills by clinical evaluation; satisfaction and student learning styles by survey. Results: The flipped-curriculum was piloted in 38 students; mean age 25+2.2 years; 63% male. Baseline knowledge was low (mean baseline score 43+21%) and improved significantly (mean final score 70+23%; increase 29%, 95%CI 20-37%, p
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信