{"title":"历史上深思熟虑的问题,作为新的教学方法,以病人为中心的护理:在澳大利亚农村临床学校(RCS)的试点研究。","authors":"Sl Middleton, M. Buist","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20161216053958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by long case to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"6 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughtful questions in the history as new pedagogy for teaching patient centred care: A pilot study in an Australian Rural Clinical School (RCS).\",\"authors\":\"Sl Middleton, M. Buist\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jcme.20161216053958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by long case to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"14-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20161216053958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20161216053958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thoughtful questions in the history as new pedagogy for teaching patient centred care: A pilot study in an Australian Rural Clinical School (RCS).
Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by long case to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.