历史上深思熟虑的问题,作为新的教学方法,以病人为中心的护理:在澳大利亚农村临床学校(RCS)的试点研究。

Sl Middleton, M. Buist
{"title":"历史上深思熟虑的问题,作为新的教学方法,以病人为中心的护理:在澳大利亚农村临床学校(RCS)的试点研究。","authors":"Sl Middleton, M. Buist","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20161216053958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by “long case” to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"6 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughtful questions in the history as new pedagogy for teaching patient centred care: A pilot study in an Australian Rural Clinical School (RCS).\",\"authors\":\"Sl Middleton, M. Buist\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jcme.20161216053958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by “long case” to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"14-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20161216053958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20161216053958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:了解患者病史是医患关系的核心。它通常对诊断至关重要,在患者的持续临床护理中也起着重要作用。然而,随着从“长病例”评估到客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的转变,医学生花在病人身上的时间减少了,当他们做病史记录时,也以教学清单的方式完成。这种学习与现在更有健康知识的病人的需求背道而驰。方法:通过反复的过程,我们开发了一个项目,在真正的病人床边教授病史,重点是听病人说什么,而不是传统的病史清单。通过匿名在线调查,我们寻求学生对这种教学方式的反馈。结果:在这个项目的三年里(从2013年开始),85名学生中有76人回应了调查(89%的回复率)。学生们大多能接受这样的想法:追踪病人给他们的线索和信息,然后以一种更有趣的方式向同龄人展示这些信息。然而,学生们的热情却有所下降,因为他们以一种更随意但更以病人为中心的方式学习历史。结论:这个项目是可行的,并且受到学生们的欢迎。主要的限制是学生们因为没有被教授可检查的欧安组织案例而感到沮丧,而且临床医生的时间承诺很繁重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoughtful questions in the history as new pedagogy for teaching patient centred care: A pilot study in an Australian Rural Clinical School (RCS).
Abstract Introduction: The taking of the patient medical history is at the heart of the doctor patient relationship. It is often critical for a diagnosis and also plays an important part in ongoing clinical care of the patient. However, with the move away from assessment by “long case” to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), medical students spend less time with patients and when they do take a history it is done in a didactic checklist manner. This learning is contrary to the needs of the now more health literate patient. Methods: By an iterative process we developed a program of teaching medical history at the bedside of real patients that focussed on listening to what the patient said as opposed to the traditional history checklist. By anonymous online survey we sought feedback from the students on this way of teaching. Results: Over the three years of this program (from 2013) 76 of the 85 students responded to the survey (89% response rate). Students were mostly receptive to the ideas of following up on clues and information that patients gave them and then presenting this information in a more interesting way to peers. However, there was less enthusiasm, for taking the history in a more casual but patient centred way Conclusion: This program was feasible and welcomed by the students. The major limitations were that students were frustrated by not being taught examinable OSCE cases and that the time commitment by the clinician was onerous.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信