危重新生儿重症监护患者的酸碱紊乱及通过酸碱紊乱变量的存在预测生存

Imteyaz Ahmad, Arif Ahmed, S. Roy
{"title":"危重新生儿重症监护患者的酸碱紊乱及通过酸碱紊乱变量的存在预测生存","authors":"Imteyaz Ahmad, Arif Ahmed, S. Roy","doi":"10.4172/2167-0897.1000207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The acid base abnormalities are common in neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis leading to considerable morbidity and mortality and timely assessment and management of these acid-base derangements leads to a better outcome. So, we did a observational study to assess acid base disorders in neonates by using Boston, Copenhagen approach and Stewart approach and the role of the various variables on predicting the acid base status and the worst outcome in neonates. \nStudy design and methods: An observational study was conducted on the samples provided from the neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) and Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (Dr RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India. The blood gas analysis, electrolytes, albumin, lactate levels were compared in the two ailments. The presence of acid base disorders were calculated using Copenhagen approach and Stewart method; and the influence of various variables on acid base disorders and outcome were analyzed. \nResults: The metabolic acidosis and alkalosis were seen in 1 and 10 patients as per Boston approach and in 18 and 18 patients with Copenhagen approach. The increased anion gap (AG), and low and high strong ion difference (SID) as measured by Stewart approach were seen in 23,21 and 23 neonates respectively. The acid-base status determined by both Copenhagen and Stewart approach were found to be interrelated. For detecting metabolic acidosis the sensitivity of high for high anion gap (66.67%) and hyponatremia (57.89 %) , whereas the specificity is high for lactic acidosis (94.74 %), hyperchloraemia (86.99%) and hyponatremia (81.08%). The low PaCO2 (89.4%) and low SID (73.68%) has a high sensitivity for predicting the non-survival , whereas the lactic acidosis(94.74%) has the high specificity of predicting the non-survival , followed by hyponatremia (81.08%), low SID (75.68%), hypoalbuminaemia (70.27%) and low PaCO2 (70.27%). \nConclusion: In neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis, acid-base disorders are common. Both the approaches are good in determining the acid-base status, but in complicated situation strong ion difference and strong ion gap works better in determining acid-base status. Derangements like low PaCO2, low SID, hypoalbuminaemia, lactic acidosis and hyponatremia are predictors of worst outcome.","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0897.1000207","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acid Base Disorders in Critically Ill Neonatal Intensive Care Patients and Predicting Survival by the Presence of Deranged Acid-Base Variables\",\"authors\":\"Imteyaz Ahmad, Arif Ahmed, S. Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0897.1000207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The acid base abnormalities are common in neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis leading to considerable morbidity and mortality and timely assessment and management of these acid-base derangements leads to a better outcome. So, we did a observational study to assess acid base disorders in neonates by using Boston, Copenhagen approach and Stewart approach and the role of the various variables on predicting the acid base status and the worst outcome in neonates. \\nStudy design and methods: An observational study was conducted on the samples provided from the neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) and Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (Dr RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India. The blood gas analysis, electrolytes, albumin, lactate levels were compared in the two ailments. The presence of acid base disorders were calculated using Copenhagen approach and Stewart method; and the influence of various variables on acid base disorders and outcome were analyzed. \\nResults: The metabolic acidosis and alkalosis were seen in 1 and 10 patients as per Boston approach and in 18 and 18 patients with Copenhagen approach. The increased anion gap (AG), and low and high strong ion difference (SID) as measured by Stewart approach were seen in 23,21 and 23 neonates respectively. The acid-base status determined by both Copenhagen and Stewart approach were found to be interrelated. For detecting metabolic acidosis the sensitivity of high for high anion gap (66.67%) and hyponatremia (57.89 %) , whereas the specificity is high for lactic acidosis (94.74 %), hyperchloraemia (86.99%) and hyponatremia (81.08%). The low PaCO2 (89.4%) and low SID (73.68%) has a high sensitivity for predicting the non-survival , whereas the lactic acidosis(94.74%) has the high specificity of predicting the non-survival , followed by hyponatremia (81.08%), low SID (75.68%), hypoalbuminaemia (70.27%) and low PaCO2 (70.27%). \\nConclusion: In neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis, acid-base disorders are common. Both the approaches are good in determining the acid-base status, but in complicated situation strong ion difference and strong ion gap works better in determining acid-base status. Derangements like low PaCO2, low SID, hypoalbuminaemia, lactic acidosis and hyponatremia are predictors of worst outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neonatal biology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0897.1000207\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neonatal biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:酸碱异常在新生儿窒息和败血症中很常见,导致相当高的发病率和死亡率,及时评估和处理这些酸碱异常可获得更好的预后。因此,我们做了一项观察性研究来评估新生儿的酸碱失调通过使用波士顿,哥本哈根方法和斯图尔特方法以及各种变量在预测新生儿酸碱状态和最坏结果方面的作用。研究设计和方法:对印度新德里医学教育与研究研究生院(PGIMER)和Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (Dr RML)医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治的出生窒息和败血症新生儿的样本进行了一项观察性研究。比较了两种疾病的血气分析、电解质、白蛋白、乳酸水平。采用Copenhagen法和Stewart法计算酸碱紊乱的存在;并分析了各变量对酸碱失调及转归的影响。结果:波士顿入路1例和10例,哥本哈根入路18例和18例,分别出现代谢性酸中毒和碱中毒。斯图尔特法测定的阴离子间隙(AG)和强弱离子差(SID)分别增加23例、21例和23例。发现哥本哈根法和斯图尔特法测定的酸碱状态是相互关联的。检测代谢性酸中毒,对高阴离子间隙(66.67%)和低钠血症(57.89%)的敏感性较高,对乳酸性酸中毒(94.74%)、高氯血症(86.99%)和低钠血症(81.08%)的特异性较高。低PaCO2(89.4%)和低SID(73.68%)对预测不能生存具有较高的敏感性,乳酸酸中毒(94.74%)对预测不能生存具有较高的特异性,其次是低钠血症(81.08%)、低SID(75.68%)、低白蛋白血症(70.27%)和低PaCO2(70.27%)。结论:在新生儿窒息和败血症中,酸碱失调是常见的。两种方法均能较好地测定酸碱状态,但在复杂情况下,强离子差和强离子间隙法测定酸碱状态的效果更好。低PaCO2、低SID、低白蛋白血症、乳酸酸中毒和低钠血症等紊乱是最坏结果的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acid Base Disorders in Critically Ill Neonatal Intensive Care Patients and Predicting Survival by the Presence of Deranged Acid-Base Variables
Objective: The acid base abnormalities are common in neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis leading to considerable morbidity and mortality and timely assessment and management of these acid-base derangements leads to a better outcome. So, we did a observational study to assess acid base disorders in neonates by using Boston, Copenhagen approach and Stewart approach and the role of the various variables on predicting the acid base status and the worst outcome in neonates. Study design and methods: An observational study was conducted on the samples provided from the neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) and Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (Dr RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India. The blood gas analysis, electrolytes, albumin, lactate levels were compared in the two ailments. The presence of acid base disorders were calculated using Copenhagen approach and Stewart method; and the influence of various variables on acid base disorders and outcome were analyzed. Results: The metabolic acidosis and alkalosis were seen in 1 and 10 patients as per Boston approach and in 18 and 18 patients with Copenhagen approach. The increased anion gap (AG), and low and high strong ion difference (SID) as measured by Stewart approach were seen in 23,21 and 23 neonates respectively. The acid-base status determined by both Copenhagen and Stewart approach were found to be interrelated. For detecting metabolic acidosis the sensitivity of high for high anion gap (66.67%) and hyponatremia (57.89 %) , whereas the specificity is high for lactic acidosis (94.74 %), hyperchloraemia (86.99%) and hyponatremia (81.08%). The low PaCO2 (89.4%) and low SID (73.68%) has a high sensitivity for predicting the non-survival , whereas the lactic acidosis(94.74%) has the high specificity of predicting the non-survival , followed by hyponatremia (81.08%), low SID (75.68%), hypoalbuminaemia (70.27%) and low PaCO2 (70.27%). Conclusion: In neonates with birth asphyxia and sepsis, acid-base disorders are common. Both the approaches are good in determining the acid-base status, but in complicated situation strong ion difference and strong ion gap works better in determining acid-base status. Derangements like low PaCO2, low SID, hypoalbuminaemia, lactic acidosis and hyponatremia are predictors of worst outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信