{"title":"国民待遇政策对谁有利?尼日利亚家庭疟疾治疗行为分析","authors":"Y. Adewoyin","doi":"10.5455/JBH.20170205020326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study investigates whether or not households in Nigeria are aware and guided by the national treatment policy in their health seeking behaviour and assesses the impacts of the treatment choices of the households on the prevalence of malaria, especially in the light of spatial variations in malaria prevalence in the study area. Methods: Using a structured questionnaire administered on 1,084 household heads randomly selected from 15 residential neighbourhoods of contrasting residential environmental quality, defined largely by income and education, in Ibadan in 2015, data on knowledge of treatment policies, treatment choices, whether or not the policies influenced their treatment choices and frequency of treating episodes of malaria in the households annually were elicited. The data were analyzed using proportion, percentages, One-Way Analysis of variance, Chi Square and Spearman Rank Correlation statistical techniques. Results: More than 70% of the respondents in the high and medium density residential neighbourhoods were not aware of any treatment policy, nearly 43% of the respondents treated malaria in their households through self-medication while about 27.8% of those who patronized health facilities received prescription notes rather than drugs. Income affected treatment choices (X2 = 22.892, P < 0.001) just as literacy did (X2 = 87.530, P < 0.001). The correlation analyses also show that treatment choices affected the frequency of treating malaria and number of days spent treating an episode of malaria. Conclusion: The study concluded that poor knowledge of and gaps in the treatment policy contributed to the high prevalence of malaria in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":90204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral health","volume":"6 1","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National treatment policy for whom? Analysis of malaria treatment behaviour in Nigerian households -\",\"authors\":\"Y. Adewoyin\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JBH.20170205020326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study investigates whether or not households in Nigeria are aware and guided by the national treatment policy in their health seeking behaviour and assesses the impacts of the treatment choices of the households on the prevalence of malaria, especially in the light of spatial variations in malaria prevalence in the study area. Methods: Using a structured questionnaire administered on 1,084 household heads randomly selected from 15 residential neighbourhoods of contrasting residential environmental quality, defined largely by income and education, in Ibadan in 2015, data on knowledge of treatment policies, treatment choices, whether or not the policies influenced their treatment choices and frequency of treating episodes of malaria in the households annually were elicited. The data were analyzed using proportion, percentages, One-Way Analysis of variance, Chi Square and Spearman Rank Correlation statistical techniques. Results: More than 70% of the respondents in the high and medium density residential neighbourhoods were not aware of any treatment policy, nearly 43% of the respondents treated malaria in their households through self-medication while about 27.8% of those who patronized health facilities received prescription notes rather than drugs. Income affected treatment choices (X2 = 22.892, P < 0.001) just as literacy did (X2 = 87.530, P < 0.001). The correlation analyses also show that treatment choices affected the frequency of treating malaria and number of days spent treating an episode of malaria. Conclusion: The study concluded that poor knowledge of and gaps in the treatment policy contributed to the high prevalence of malaria in Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of behavioral health\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"120-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of behavioral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JBH.20170205020326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JBH.20170205020326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究调查了尼日利亚家庭在其就医行为中是否意识到国家治疗政策并受到其指导,并评估了家庭治疗选择对疟疾流行的影响,特别是考虑到研究地区疟疾流行的空间差异。方法:2015年,在伊巴丹市15个主要由收入和教育程度定义的住宅环境质量对比小区中,随机抽取1084户户主进行结构化问卷调查,获取有关治疗政策知识、治疗选择、政策是否影响其治疗选择以及家庭每年治疗疟疾发作频率的数据。采用比例、百分比、单因素方差分析、卡方和Spearman秩相关统计技术对数据进行分析。结果:中高密度居民区70%以上的调查对象不了解任何治疗政策,近43%的调查对象在其家庭中通过自我药疗治疗疟疾,约27.8%的调查对象到卫生机构就诊时收到的是处方单而不是药品。收入影响治疗选择(X2 = 22.892, P < 0.001),正如识字率(X2 = 87.530, P < 0.001)。相关分析还表明,治疗选择影响治疗疟疾的频率和治疗疟疾发作的天数。结论:该研究得出结论,对治疗政策的不了解和差距是尼日利亚疟疾高流行的原因。
National treatment policy for whom? Analysis of malaria treatment behaviour in Nigerian households -
Background: This study investigates whether or not households in Nigeria are aware and guided by the national treatment policy in their health seeking behaviour and assesses the impacts of the treatment choices of the households on the prevalence of malaria, especially in the light of spatial variations in malaria prevalence in the study area. Methods: Using a structured questionnaire administered on 1,084 household heads randomly selected from 15 residential neighbourhoods of contrasting residential environmental quality, defined largely by income and education, in Ibadan in 2015, data on knowledge of treatment policies, treatment choices, whether or not the policies influenced their treatment choices and frequency of treating episodes of malaria in the households annually were elicited. The data were analyzed using proportion, percentages, One-Way Analysis of variance, Chi Square and Spearman Rank Correlation statistical techniques. Results: More than 70% of the respondents in the high and medium density residential neighbourhoods were not aware of any treatment policy, nearly 43% of the respondents treated malaria in their households through self-medication while about 27.8% of those who patronized health facilities received prescription notes rather than drugs. Income affected treatment choices (X2 = 22.892, P < 0.001) just as literacy did (X2 = 87.530, P < 0.001). The correlation analyses also show that treatment choices affected the frequency of treating malaria and number of days spent treating an episode of malaria. Conclusion: The study concluded that poor knowledge of and gaps in the treatment policy contributed to the high prevalence of malaria in Nigeria.