剩余的自由

Richard M. Edwards
{"title":"剩余的自由","authors":"Richard M. Edwards","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the argument that detainees do not lose their right to liberty under article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as currently thought. Instead, the article argues that they continue to enjoy a residual liberty which may be relied upon by detainees when challenging aspects of their detention.","PeriodicalId":83211,"journal":{"name":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Residual liberty\",\"authors\":\"Richard M. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the argument that detainees do not lose their right to liberty under article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as currently thought. Instead, the article argues that they continue to enjoy a residual liberty which may be relied upon by detainees when challenging aspects of their detention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出的论点是,被拘留者并没有像目前认为的那样失去《欧洲人权公约》第5条规定的自由权利。相反,该条认为,他们继续享有剩余的自由,被拘留者在对其拘留的各个方面提出质疑时可以依靠这种自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Residual liberty
This article presents the argument that detainees do not lose their right to liberty under article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as currently thought. Instead, the article argues that they continue to enjoy a residual liberty which may be relied upon by detainees when challenging aspects of their detention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信