{"title":"政治权力的悖论:同性婚姻和最高法院","authors":"K. Yoshino","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.","PeriodicalId":83442,"journal":{"name":"Utah law review","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SUPREME COURT\",\"authors\":\"K. Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utah law review\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utah law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utah law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
我想讨论一下同性婚姻的问题,更具体地说,是霍林沃斯诉佩里案(Hollingsworth v. Perry),这是联邦政府向美国最高法院上诉,对州对婚姻的限制提出的挑战。佩里案的发展至少为我们多层次的司法系统发挥了一个作用,那就是为最高法院提供了几种选择。我首先回顾了五种可能性,从没有一个州在宪法上要求同性婚姻到所有50个州都在宪法上要求同性婚姻。然后,我转向我认为法院应该在这个连续体上走多远的问题。特别是,我考虑了经常被提及的男女同性恋者的政治权力问题应该如何影响这一决定。
THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SUPREME COURT
I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.