政治权力的悖论:同性婚姻和最高法院

K. Yoshino
{"title":"政治权力的悖论:同性婚姻和最高法院","authors":"K. Yoshino","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.  Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.","PeriodicalId":83442,"journal":{"name":"Utah law review","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SUPREME COURT\",\"authors\":\"K. Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.  Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utah law review\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utah law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utah law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2012I2.807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我想讨论一下同性婚姻的问题,更具体地说,是霍林沃斯诉佩里案(Hollingsworth v. Perry),这是联邦政府向美国最高法院上诉,对州对婚姻的限制提出的挑战。佩里案的发展至少为我们多层次的司法系统发挥了一个作用,那就是为最高法院提供了几种选择。我首先回顾了五种可能性,从没有一个州在宪法上要求同性婚姻到所有50个州都在宪法上要求同性婚姻。然后,我转向我认为法院应该在这个连续体上走多远的问题。特别是,我考虑了经常被提及的男女同性恋者的政治权力问题应该如何影响这一决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SUPREME COURT
I wish to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, and more specifically the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry , a federal challenge to a state restriction on marriage on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.  Perry ’s development has served at least one function of our multi-tiered judicial system, which is to generate several options for the Court. I first review five possibilities, which range from a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in no states to a holding that same-sex marriage is constitutionally required in all fifty. I then turn to the question of how far I believe the Court should go along this continuum. In particular, I consider how the often-invoked question of the political power of gays and lesbians should affect that determination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信