{"title":"摘掉裁判的面具:司法道歉的得体性和影响","authors":"Maxine D. Goodman","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2011I4.679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */\n table.MsoNormalTable\n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\";\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\n mso-style-noshow:yes;\n mso-style-priority:99;\n mso-style-parent:\"\";\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;\n mso-para-margin:0in;\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan;\n font-size:10.0pt;\n font-family:\"Times New Roman\",\"serif\";}\n This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench. 72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */\n table.MsoNormalTable\n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\";\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\n mso-style-noshow:yes;\n mso-style-priority:99;\n mso-style-parent:\"\";\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;\n mso-para-margin:0in;\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan;\n font-size:10.0pt;\n font-family:\"Times New Roman\",\"serif\";}\n This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench.","PeriodicalId":83442,"journal":{"name":"Utah law review","volume":"2011 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REMOVING THE UMPIRE’S MASK: THE PROPRIETY AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL APOLOGIES\",\"authors\":\"Maxine D. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ULR.V2011I4.679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */\\n table.MsoNormalTable\\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Table Normal\\\";\\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\\n mso-style-noshow:yes;\\n mso-style-priority:99;\\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\";\\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;\\n mso-para-margin:0in;\\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan;\\n font-size:10.0pt;\\n font-family:\\\"Times New Roman\\\",\\\"serif\\\";}\\n This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench. 72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */\\n table.MsoNormalTable\\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Table Normal\\\";\\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\\n mso-style-noshow:yes;\\n mso-style-priority:99;\\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\";\\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;\\n mso-para-margin:0in;\\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan;\\n font-size:10.0pt;\\n font-family:\\\"Times New Roman\\\",\\\"serif\\\";}\\n This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utah law review\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utah law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2011I4.679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utah law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2011I4.679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
REMOVING THE UMPIRE’S MASK: THE PROPRIETY AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL APOLOGIES
72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench. 72 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
This paper addresses two related phenomena concerning judges apologizing and Noonan's mask metaphor. First, this Article addresses when a judge removes her mask and apologizes to a party or lawyer in her courtroom, thereby revealing her humanity. Second, this Article describes when a judge peers through a party's mask, views the humanity underneath, and apologizes to that party for something that occurred in the courtroom. Specifically, this Article addresses the motivations for, propriety of, and impact of judicial apologies from the bench.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
