鱼离开水:来自一个高度社会性动物的案例研究的见解,该动物未能通过镜像自我识别测试

Q3 Psychology
S. Barber-Meyer, Lori J. Schmidt
{"title":"鱼离开水:来自一个高度社会性动物的案例研究的见解,该动物未能通过镜像自我识别测试","authors":"S. Barber-Meyer, Lori J. Schmidt","doi":"10.5070/P4331048295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Barber-Meyer, Shannon; Schmidt, Lori | Abstract: Mirror self-recognition (MSR) tests have been conducted with a variety of species with the aim of examining whether subject animals have the capacity for self-awareness. To date, the majority of animals that have convincingly passed are highly social mammals whose wild counterparts live in complex societies, though there is much debate concerning what constitutes passing and what passing means in terms of self-awareness. Amid recent reports that a fish (cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus) passed, it is intriguing that a mammal as highly social, tolerant, attentive, and cooperative as the grey wolf (Canis lupus) reportedly failed the test. Given the many possible reasons for failure, we aimed to elucidate the wolves’ responses at various stages of the MSR test to pinpoint potential problem areas where species-appropriate modifications to the test may be needed. Thus, we evaluated 6 socialized, captive grey wolves as a case study of failed MSR in socially complex canids. At a minimum, wolves did not respond to their reflection as an unfamiliar conspecific. Unfortunately, the wolves rapidly lost interest in the mirror and were uninterested in the applied marks. We note limitations of the MSR test for this species, recommend changes for future MSR tests of wolves, discuss other emerging self-cognizance methods for socially complex canids, and highlight the need for a suite of ecologically relevant, potentially scalable self-cognizance methods. Our findings and recommendations may aid in understanding self-cognizance in other untested highly social, cooperatively-hunting, coursing, terrestrial carnivores such as African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), and African lions (Panthera leo).","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fish out of water: Insights from a case study of a highly social animal that failed the mirror self-recognition test\",\"authors\":\"S. Barber-Meyer, Lori J. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/P4331048295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Barber-Meyer, Shannon; Schmidt, Lori | Abstract: Mirror self-recognition (MSR) tests have been conducted with a variety of species with the aim of examining whether subject animals have the capacity for self-awareness. To date, the majority of animals that have convincingly passed are highly social mammals whose wild counterparts live in complex societies, though there is much debate concerning what constitutes passing and what passing means in terms of self-awareness. Amid recent reports that a fish (cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus) passed, it is intriguing that a mammal as highly social, tolerant, attentive, and cooperative as the grey wolf (Canis lupus) reportedly failed the test. Given the many possible reasons for failure, we aimed to elucidate the wolves’ responses at various stages of the MSR test to pinpoint potential problem areas where species-appropriate modifications to the test may be needed. Thus, we evaluated 6 socialized, captive grey wolves as a case study of failed MSR in socially complex canids. At a minimum, wolves did not respond to their reflection as an unfamiliar conspecific. Unfortunately, the wolves rapidly lost interest in the mirror and were uninterested in the applied marks. We note limitations of the MSR test for this species, recommend changes for future MSR tests of wolves, discuss other emerging self-cognizance methods for socially complex canids, and highlight the need for a suite of ecologically relevant, potentially scalable self-cognizance methods. Our findings and recommendations may aid in understanding self-cognizance in other untested highly social, cooperatively-hunting, coursing, terrestrial carnivores such as African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), and African lions (Panthera leo).\",\"PeriodicalId\":39712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/P4331048295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/P4331048295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者:Barber-Meyer, Shannon;摘要:镜像自我识别(Mirror self-recognition, MSR)实验在不同物种中进行,目的是研究被试动物是否具有自我意识能力。迄今为止,大多数令人信服地通过考试的动物都是高度社会化的哺乳动物,它们的野生同类生活在复杂的社会中,尽管关于什么是通过考试以及从自我意识的角度来看,通过考试意味着什么还存在很多争论。最近有报道称一种鱼(清洁濑鱼,Labroides dimidiatus)通过了测试,有趣的是,一种像灰狼(Canis lupus)这样高度社会化、宽容、细心和合作的哺乳动物也没有通过测试。考虑到许多可能的失败原因,我们的目标是阐明狼在MSR测试的各个阶段的反应,以找出可能需要对测试进行物种适当修改的潜在问题区域。因此,我们评估了6只社会化的圈养灰狼作为社会复杂犬科动物中失败的MSR案例研究。至少,狼不会把自己的倒影当作不熟悉的同类来看待。不幸的是,狼很快就对镜子失去了兴趣,对涂上的标记也不感兴趣。我们注意到该物种的MSR测试的局限性,建议未来狼的MSR测试的变化,讨论其他新兴的社会复杂犬科动物的自我认知方法,并强调需要一套生态相关的,潜在的可扩展的自我认知方法。我们的发现和建议可能有助于理解其他未经测试的高度群居、合作狩猎、觅食的陆地食肉动物的自我认知,如非洲野狗(Lycaon pictus)、斑点鬣狗(Crocuta Crocuta)和非洲狮子(Panthera leo)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fish out of water: Insights from a case study of a highly social animal that failed the mirror self-recognition test
Author(s): Barber-Meyer, Shannon; Schmidt, Lori | Abstract: Mirror self-recognition (MSR) tests have been conducted with a variety of species with the aim of examining whether subject animals have the capacity for self-awareness. To date, the majority of animals that have convincingly passed are highly social mammals whose wild counterparts live in complex societies, though there is much debate concerning what constitutes passing and what passing means in terms of self-awareness. Amid recent reports that a fish (cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus) passed, it is intriguing that a mammal as highly social, tolerant, attentive, and cooperative as the grey wolf (Canis lupus) reportedly failed the test. Given the many possible reasons for failure, we aimed to elucidate the wolves’ responses at various stages of the MSR test to pinpoint potential problem areas where species-appropriate modifications to the test may be needed. Thus, we evaluated 6 socialized, captive grey wolves as a case study of failed MSR in socially complex canids. At a minimum, wolves did not respond to their reflection as an unfamiliar conspecific. Unfortunately, the wolves rapidly lost interest in the mirror and were uninterested in the applied marks. We note limitations of the MSR test for this species, recommend changes for future MSR tests of wolves, discuss other emerging self-cognizance methods for socially complex canids, and highlight the need for a suite of ecologically relevant, potentially scalable self-cognizance methods. Our findings and recommendations may aid in understanding self-cognizance in other untested highly social, cooperatively-hunting, coursing, terrestrial carnivores such as African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), and African lions (Panthera leo).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信