{"title":"优化焊丝类型和焊接电流对两种材料焊接连接强度的影响,采用响应面法进行测试","authors":"H. Riyanto, S. Sugito, Abdul Fikri","doi":"10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of types of wire welding that circulate on the market and the development of welding technology, especially related to current welding, create a lack of information related to the quality of welding results for several types of materials. This can cause the strength of the welding connection to not be maximized. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of three types of wire welding and three current welding on the strength of the welding connection in two types of material testing using the response surface methodology. Box-Behnken, coupled with the RSM and the desirability function, was used to optimize the strength of the welding connection of the wire types (RD-46, LB-52, and RB-26), and current welding (100, 130, and 160 A) against two types of material testing (IWF-150 and ASTM-A517-G70). The strength of the welding connection observed in response included the tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in the welding metal and the hardness values in the main metal. Optimization of the strength of the welding connection in this study recommends the application of wire types RB-26, current welding of 100 A, and ASTM-A517-G70 material testing with the highest desirability value of 71.6%. Optimization of tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in welding metal, and hardness values in main metal by applying this parameter are 575.64 MPa, 110.69 J, 216.75 (HV10) and 126.6 (HV10), respectively. The results proved that an appropriate welding connection strength could be achieved using wire welding types and current welding in material testing.","PeriodicalId":37952,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of wire type and current welding on the strength of welding connection in two types of material testing via response surface methodology\",\"authors\":\"H. Riyanto, S. Sugito, Abdul Fikri\",\"doi\":\"10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of types of wire welding that circulate on the market and the development of welding technology, especially related to current welding, create a lack of information related to the quality of welding results for several types of materials. This can cause the strength of the welding connection to not be maximized. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of three types of wire welding and three current welding on the strength of the welding connection in two types of material testing using the response surface methodology. Box-Behnken, coupled with the RSM and the desirability function, was used to optimize the strength of the welding connection of the wire types (RD-46, LB-52, and RB-26), and current welding (100, 130, and 160 A) against two types of material testing (IWF-150 and ASTM-A517-G70). The strength of the welding connection observed in response included the tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in the welding metal and the hardness values in the main metal. Optimization of the strength of the welding connection in this study recommends the application of wire types RB-26, current welding of 100 A, and ASTM-A517-G70 material testing with the highest desirability value of 71.6%. Optimization of tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in welding metal, and hardness values in main metal by applying this parameter are 575.64 MPa, 110.69 J, 216.75 (HV10) and 126.6 (HV10), respectively. The results proved that an appropriate welding connection strength could be achieved using wire welding types and current welding in material testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Solid Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Solid Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
市场上流通的焊丝焊接类型的数量和焊接技术的发展,特别是与当前焊接有关的技术,造成了几种材料焊接结果质量相关信息的缺乏。这可能导致焊接连接的强度不能最大化。因此,本研究旨在利用响应面法优化利用三种焊丝焊接和三种电流焊接对两种材料的焊接连接强度进行测试。Box-Behnken结合RSM和可取性函数,针对两种材料测试(IWF-150和ASTM-A517-G70),对焊丝类型(RD-46、LB-52和RB-26)和电流焊接(100、130和160 A)的焊接连接强度进行了优化。在响应中观察到的焊接连接强度包括抗拉强度、夏比冲击吸收能、焊接金属的硬度值和主金属的硬度值。本研究推荐采用焊丝型号RB-26,焊接电流为100 A, ASTM-A517-G70材料试验,理想值最高为71.6%。应用该参数优化得到的抗拉强度、夏比冲击吸收能、焊接金属硬度和主金属硬度分别为575.64 MPa、110.69 J、216.75 (HV10)和126.6 (HV10)。结果表明,在材料试验中,采用线焊方式和电流焊方式均可获得合适的焊接连接强度。
Optimization of wire type and current welding on the strength of welding connection in two types of material testing via response surface methodology
The number of types of wire welding that circulate on the market and the development of welding technology, especially related to current welding, create a lack of information related to the quality of welding results for several types of materials. This can cause the strength of the welding connection to not be maximized. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of three types of wire welding and three current welding on the strength of the welding connection in two types of material testing using the response surface methodology. Box-Behnken, coupled with the RSM and the desirability function, was used to optimize the strength of the welding connection of the wire types (RD-46, LB-52, and RB-26), and current welding (100, 130, and 160 A) against two types of material testing (IWF-150 and ASTM-A517-G70). The strength of the welding connection observed in response included the tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in the welding metal and the hardness values in the main metal. Optimization of the strength of the welding connection in this study recommends the application of wire types RB-26, current welding of 100 A, and ASTM-A517-G70 material testing with the highest desirability value of 71.6%. Optimization of tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in welding metal, and hardness values in main metal by applying this parameter are 575.64 MPa, 110.69 J, 216.75 (HV10) and 126.6 (HV10), respectively. The results proved that an appropriate welding connection strength could be achieved using wire welding types and current welding in material testing.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Solid Mechanics (ESM) is an online international journal for publishing high quality peer reviewed papers in the field of theoretical and applied solid mechanics. The primary focus is to exchange ideas about investigating behavior and properties of engineering materials (such as metals, composites, ceramics, polymers, FGMs, rocks and concretes, asphalt mixtures, bio and nano materials) and their mechanical characterization (including strength and deformation behavior, fatigue and fracture, stress measurements, etc.) through experimental, theoretical and numerical research studies. Researchers and practitioners (from deferent areas such as mechanical and manufacturing, aerospace, railway, bio-mechanics, civil and mining, materials and metallurgy, oil, gas and petroleum industries, pipeline, marine and offshore sectors) are encouraged to submit their original, unpublished contributions.