基于交通安全指标的车辆跟随状况分析实证研究

Q3 Engineering
F. Bella, A. Calvi, F. D’Amico
{"title":"基于交通安全指标的车辆跟随状况分析实证研究","authors":"F. Bella, A. Calvi, F. D’Amico","doi":"10.4399/97888548735442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The likelihood that a car-following driving condition can lead to a rear-end collision is usually assessed through the Time Headway (TH) and Time To Collision (TTC), considered as safety indicators of traffic conditions. The present study computed and compared TH and TTC on the basis of data recorded by means of a traffic control system of an Italian highway. Specifically four measurements sites were investigated for two days and almost 200000 travelling vehicles were collected. About 50% of vehicles were travelling in car-following conditions. The overall objectives of this paper consisted in verifying if, on highways, TH and TTC are independent of each other and, therefore, do not provide the same information on the driver behaviour in car-following situation but could be used for evaluating different conditions. Moreover the effects of different visibility conditions (day or night driving), the type of lead vehicle (passenger car or heavy vehicle) and the type of travelling lane (left or right) on TH and TTC were evaluated in order to increase the knowledge of drivers behavior in car-following conditions. The results demonstrated that TH and TTC provide different information on driver behaviour in carfollowing conditions as they can be considered practically independent of each other. Moreover it was found that shorter THs are used by the following driver during daytime, behind passenger vehicle and driving on the passing lane. On the contrary only few cases with critical TTC values were recorded, demonstrating that TTC is more effective for detecting impending dangerous situations. Language: en","PeriodicalId":39032,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Transportation Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"5-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4399/97888548735442","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical study on traffic safety indicators for the analysis of car-following conditions\",\"authors\":\"F. Bella, A. Calvi, F. D’Amico\",\"doi\":\"10.4399/97888548735442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The likelihood that a car-following driving condition can lead to a rear-end collision is usually assessed through the Time Headway (TH) and Time To Collision (TTC), considered as safety indicators of traffic conditions. The present study computed and compared TH and TTC on the basis of data recorded by means of a traffic control system of an Italian highway. Specifically four measurements sites were investigated for two days and almost 200000 travelling vehicles were collected. About 50% of vehicles were travelling in car-following conditions. The overall objectives of this paper consisted in verifying if, on highways, TH and TTC are independent of each other and, therefore, do not provide the same information on the driver behaviour in car-following situation but could be used for evaluating different conditions. Moreover the effects of different visibility conditions (day or night driving), the type of lead vehicle (passenger car or heavy vehicle) and the type of travelling lane (left or right) on TH and TTC were evaluated in order to increase the knowledge of drivers behavior in car-following conditions. The results demonstrated that TH and TTC provide different information on driver behaviour in carfollowing conditions as they can be considered practically independent of each other. Moreover it was found that shorter THs are used by the following driver during daytime, behind passenger vehicle and driving on the passing lane. On the contrary only few cases with critical TTC values were recorded, demonstrating that TTC is more effective for detecting impending dangerous situations. Language: en\",\"PeriodicalId\":39032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Transportation Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"5-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4399/97888548735442\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Transportation Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4399/97888548735442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Transportation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4399/97888548735442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

通常通过车头时距(Time车头时距)和碰撞时间(Time to collision, TTC)作为交通状况的安全指标来评估汽车跟随驾驶状态导致追尾的可能性。本研究以意大利高速公路交通控制系统记录的数据为基础,计算并比较了TH和TTC。具体来说,对四个测量点进行了为期两天的调查,收集了近20万辆旅行车辆。约50%的车辆在车辆跟随状态下行驶。本文的总体目标包括验证在高速公路上,TH和TTC是否相互独立,因此,不能提供关于车辆跟随情况下驾驶员行为的相同信息,但可以用于评估不同的条件。此外,还评估了不同能见度条件(白天或夜间驾驶)、领先车辆类型(乘用车或重型车辆)和行驶车道类型(左车道或右车道)对TH和TTC的影响,以增加对车辆跟随条件下驾驶员行为的认识。结果表明,TH和TTC在汽车跟随条件下提供了不同的驾驶员行为信息,因为它们实际上是相互独立的。此外,我们还发现,在白天,在客运车辆后面以及在超车道上行驶时,后面的司机使用的是较短的THs。相反,只有少数具有临界TTC值的案例被记录下来,这表明TTC对于检测即将发生的危险情况更有效。语言:在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical study on traffic safety indicators for the analysis of car-following conditions
The likelihood that a car-following driving condition can lead to a rear-end collision is usually assessed through the Time Headway (TH) and Time To Collision (TTC), considered as safety indicators of traffic conditions. The present study computed and compared TH and TTC on the basis of data recorded by means of a traffic control system of an Italian highway. Specifically four measurements sites were investigated for two days and almost 200000 travelling vehicles were collected. About 50% of vehicles were travelling in car-following conditions. The overall objectives of this paper consisted in verifying if, on highways, TH and TTC are independent of each other and, therefore, do not provide the same information on the driver behaviour in car-following situation but could be used for evaluating different conditions. Moreover the effects of different visibility conditions (day or night driving), the type of lead vehicle (passenger car or heavy vehicle) and the type of travelling lane (left or right) on TH and TTC were evaluated in order to increase the knowledge of drivers behavior in car-following conditions. The results demonstrated that TH and TTC provide different information on driver behaviour in carfollowing conditions as they can be considered practically independent of each other. Moreover it was found that shorter THs are used by the following driver during daytime, behind passenger vehicle and driving on the passing lane. On the contrary only few cases with critical TTC values were recorded, demonstrating that TTC is more effective for detecting impending dangerous situations. Language: en
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Transportation Studies
Advances in Transportation Studies Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信