自行车经济学:骑自行车如何拯救经济

Jesus M. Barajas
{"title":"自行车经济学:骑自行车如何拯救经济","authors":"Jesus M. Barajas","doi":"10.5070/BP327124503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Berkeley Planning Journal, Volume 27, 2014 Bikenomics: How Bicycling Can Save the Economy By Elly Blue Microcosm, 2013 Reviewed by Jesus M. Barajas Planning often prioritizes transportation projects based on quantified costs and benefits to the community. Recognizing decision-making standard, in Bikenomics Elly Blue delivers a pro-bike argument with which planners and bicycle activists might be familiar, but she supports this argument with facts and figures that will make city comptrollers take notice. A Portland- based writer and bicycle advocate, Elly Blue backs her claims with research that spans popular blog writing, advocacy organization reports, and academic articles in a way that informs, engages, and entertains. She invites an understanding that individuals, businesses, and cities all benefit from more and safer bicycling in their communities. Bikenomics is largely organized around common refrains about the impossibility of making bicycling a coequal mode in the US transportation system. In the first few chapters, Blue tackles the high cost of automobiles and car ownership relative to the bicycle. Costs are borne, Blue argues, not only by individuals who must spend a high proportion of their income on transportation, but by all taxpayers who must pay the long-term debt incurred by borrowing to build roads. On the other hand, investment in bicycle infrastructure costs a fraction to build and maintain and, as argued later, bring local economic benefits that a new highway interchange cannot. In the remainder of the book, Blue addresses topics common in writing on bicycling, but, unlike other journalistic and advocacy pieces, she focuses explicitly on quantifying costs and benefits. For example, in the chapter titled “Superhighway to Health,” Blue describes the interrelationship between lack of access to healthy food, chronic disease, and sedentary lifestyles, asserting that a bicycle-based lifestyle could improve health outcomes and reduce total health-care costs. In a later chapter, Blue relates how two companies that paid employees to bicycle to work saw productivity gains and health-insurance-premium savings that exceeded the amount of the incentives. She approaches bike sharing, bike parking, and the economic impact of bicycling on local businesses similarly in order to build a case for the bicycle as a savior of the economy. One of the most important contributions of Bikenomics is its consistent, explicit emphasis on equity issues in bicycling. Some equity issues","PeriodicalId":39937,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Planning Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/BP327124503","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bikenomics: How Bicycling Can Save the Economy By Elly Blue\",\"authors\":\"Jesus M. Barajas\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/BP327124503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal, Volume 27, 2014 Bikenomics: How Bicycling Can Save the Economy By Elly Blue Microcosm, 2013 Reviewed by Jesus M. Barajas Planning often prioritizes transportation projects based on quantified costs and benefits to the community. Recognizing decision-making standard, in Bikenomics Elly Blue delivers a pro-bike argument with which planners and bicycle activists might be familiar, but she supports this argument with facts and figures that will make city comptrollers take notice. A Portland- based writer and bicycle advocate, Elly Blue backs her claims with research that spans popular blog writing, advocacy organization reports, and academic articles in a way that informs, engages, and entertains. She invites an understanding that individuals, businesses, and cities all benefit from more and safer bicycling in their communities. Bikenomics is largely organized around common refrains about the impossibility of making bicycling a coequal mode in the US transportation system. In the first few chapters, Blue tackles the high cost of automobiles and car ownership relative to the bicycle. Costs are borne, Blue argues, not only by individuals who must spend a high proportion of their income on transportation, but by all taxpayers who must pay the long-term debt incurred by borrowing to build roads. On the other hand, investment in bicycle infrastructure costs a fraction to build and maintain and, as argued later, bring local economic benefits that a new highway interchange cannot. In the remainder of the book, Blue addresses topics common in writing on bicycling, but, unlike other journalistic and advocacy pieces, she focuses explicitly on quantifying costs and benefits. For example, in the chapter titled “Superhighway to Health,” Blue describes the interrelationship between lack of access to healthy food, chronic disease, and sedentary lifestyles, asserting that a bicycle-based lifestyle could improve health outcomes and reduce total health-care costs. In a later chapter, Blue relates how two companies that paid employees to bicycle to work saw productivity gains and health-insurance-premium savings that exceeded the amount of the incentives. She approaches bike sharing, bike parking, and the economic impact of bicycling on local businesses similarly in order to build a case for the bicycle as a savior of the economy. One of the most important contributions of Bikenomics is its consistent, explicit emphasis on equity issues in bicycling. Some equity issues\",\"PeriodicalId\":39937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/BP327124503\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/BP327124503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Planning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/BP327124503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

伯克利规划杂志,第27卷,2014年,自行车经济学:如何骑自行车可以拯救经济,作者:Elly Blue Microcosm, 2013回顾:Jesus M. Barajas规划通常根据量化的成本和社区效益来优先考虑交通项目。认识到决策标准,在《自行车经济学》一书中,艾丽·布鲁提出了一个支持自行车的论点,规划者和自行车活动家可能对此并不熟悉,但她用事实和数据来支持这一论点,这些事实和数据将引起城市审计员的注意。作为一名波特兰的作家和自行车倡导者,艾丽·布鲁支持她的主张,她的研究涵盖了流行的博客写作、倡导组织的报告和学术文章,以一种告知、参与和娱乐的方式。她希望人们理解,个人、企业和城市都能从社区中更多、更安全的自行车中受益。自行车经济学在很大程度上是围绕着不可能让骑自行车成为美国交通系统中的一种平等模式这一共同原则组织起来的。在书的前几章中,布鲁论述了汽车的高成本以及拥有汽车相对于自行车的高成本。布鲁认为,成本不仅要由必须将收入的很大一部分用于交通的个人承担,还要由所有纳税人承担,因为他们必须偿还因借钱修建道路而产生的长期债务。另一方面,投资自行车基础设施的建设和维护成本很低,而且,正如后面所说,给当地带来的经济效益是一个新的高速公路立交所不能带来的。在书的其余部分,Blue讨论了关于骑自行车的常见话题,但与其他新闻和倡导文章不同的是,她明确地关注于量化成本和收益。例如,在题为“通往健康的高速公路”一章中,布鲁描述了缺乏健康食品、慢性疾病和久坐不动的生活方式之间的相互关系,声称以自行车为基础的生活方式可以改善健康状况,降低医疗保健总成本。在后面的一章中,布鲁讲述了两家公司是如何奖励员工骑自行车上班的,他们看到了生产率的提高和健康保险保费的节省,这些都超过了激励的金额。她以同样的方式看待共享单车、自行车停放以及自行车对当地企业的经济影响,以证明自行车是经济的救世主。Bikenomics最重要的贡献之一是它一贯明确地强调骑车的公平问题。一些股权问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bikenomics: How Bicycling Can Save the Economy By Elly Blue
Berkeley Planning Journal, Volume 27, 2014 Bikenomics: How Bicycling Can Save the Economy By Elly Blue Microcosm, 2013 Reviewed by Jesus M. Barajas Planning often prioritizes transportation projects based on quantified costs and benefits to the community. Recognizing decision-making standard, in Bikenomics Elly Blue delivers a pro-bike argument with which planners and bicycle activists might be familiar, but she supports this argument with facts and figures that will make city comptrollers take notice. A Portland- based writer and bicycle advocate, Elly Blue backs her claims with research that spans popular blog writing, advocacy organization reports, and academic articles in a way that informs, engages, and entertains. She invites an understanding that individuals, businesses, and cities all benefit from more and safer bicycling in their communities. Bikenomics is largely organized around common refrains about the impossibility of making bicycling a coequal mode in the US transportation system. In the first few chapters, Blue tackles the high cost of automobiles and car ownership relative to the bicycle. Costs are borne, Blue argues, not only by individuals who must spend a high proportion of their income on transportation, but by all taxpayers who must pay the long-term debt incurred by borrowing to build roads. On the other hand, investment in bicycle infrastructure costs a fraction to build and maintain and, as argued later, bring local economic benefits that a new highway interchange cannot. In the remainder of the book, Blue addresses topics common in writing on bicycling, but, unlike other journalistic and advocacy pieces, she focuses explicitly on quantifying costs and benefits. For example, in the chapter titled “Superhighway to Health,” Blue describes the interrelationship between lack of access to healthy food, chronic disease, and sedentary lifestyles, asserting that a bicycle-based lifestyle could improve health outcomes and reduce total health-care costs. In a later chapter, Blue relates how two companies that paid employees to bicycle to work saw productivity gains and health-insurance-premium savings that exceeded the amount of the incentives. She approaches bike sharing, bike parking, and the economic impact of bicycling on local businesses similarly in order to build a case for the bicycle as a savior of the economy. One of the most important contributions of Bikenomics is its consistent, explicit emphasis on equity issues in bicycling. Some equity issues
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Planning Journal
Berkeley Planning Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Berkeley Planning Journal is an annual peer-reviewed journal, published by graduate students in the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the University of California, Berkeley since 1985.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信