想成为运动机能学学生对学校科目、一般学校和课外学习的态度

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Saša Milovuković, Hrvoje Sivrić
{"title":"想成为运动机能学学生对学校科目、一般学校和课外学习的态度","authors":"Saša Milovuković, Hrvoje Sivrić","doi":"10.5671/ca.45.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to determine and explain the attitudes of wannabe students of kinesiology regarding how much they like each school subject, school in general and extracurricular learning. The answers in the questionnaire were given on a semantic differential scale from 1 (100% repulsive to me) to 5 (I adore it). The study involved 63 wannabe kinesiology students who in 2021 actively prepared for the entrance exam at the Croatian Faculties of Kinesiology. The average age of the respondents was M=18.83±1.33, of which 25 girls and 38 boys. The average rating of all school subjects was M=3.14. The highest rated subject was expectedly Physical Education, but the second-best rated subject (geography) had an average rating of M=3.57. Significant difference between the rating of each school subject from the average of all school subjects was noticed in chemistry, physics and mathematics (on a negative pole compared to the average) and geography on the positive pole, with a medium to large effect size regarding the difference between arithmetic means. Extracurricular learning was almost zero correlated with all other independent variables. We can conclude that wannabe kinesiology students (aligned with other high school graduates) are not fond of school subjects, nor school in general, but this research shows they do love to learn new things not related to school, so teachers/professors might consider including extracurricular material in teaching to make prescribed material more interesting.","PeriodicalId":35544,"journal":{"name":"Collegium Antropologicum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes of Wannabe Kinesiology Students about School Subjects, School in General and Extracurricular Learning\",\"authors\":\"Saša Milovuković, Hrvoje Sivrić\",\"doi\":\"10.5671/ca.45.3.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research was to determine and explain the attitudes of wannabe students of kinesiology regarding how much they like each school subject, school in general and extracurricular learning. The answers in the questionnaire were given on a semantic differential scale from 1 (100% repulsive to me) to 5 (I adore it). The study involved 63 wannabe kinesiology students who in 2021 actively prepared for the entrance exam at the Croatian Faculties of Kinesiology. The average age of the respondents was M=18.83±1.33, of which 25 girls and 38 boys. The average rating of all school subjects was M=3.14. The highest rated subject was expectedly Physical Education, but the second-best rated subject (geography) had an average rating of M=3.57. Significant difference between the rating of each school subject from the average of all school subjects was noticed in chemistry, physics and mathematics (on a negative pole compared to the average) and geography on the positive pole, with a medium to large effect size regarding the difference between arithmetic means. Extracurricular learning was almost zero correlated with all other independent variables. We can conclude that wannabe kinesiology students (aligned with other high school graduates) are not fond of school subjects, nor school in general, but this research shows they do love to learn new things not related to school, so teachers/professors might consider including extracurricular material in teaching to make prescribed material more interesting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegium Antropologicum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegium Antropologicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.45.3.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegium Antropologicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.45.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是确定和解释想要成为运动机能学学生的态度,关于他们对每个学校科目、学校一般和课外学习的喜欢程度。问卷中的答案是根据语义差异量表给出的,从1(对我来说100%排斥)到5(我喜欢它)。这项研究涉及63名想成为运动机能学专业的学生,他们在2021年积极准备克罗地亚运动机能学学院的入学考试。调查对象平均年龄M=18.83±1.33岁,其中女生25人,男生38人。各科平均评分M=3.14。得分最高的科目是体育,但得分第二高的科目(地理)的平均得分为M=3.57。每个学校科目的评分与所有学校科目的平均值之间存在显著差异,化学、物理和数学(与平均值相比为负极)和地理(与平均值相比为正极),算术平均值之间的差异具有中等到较大的效应大小。课外学习与其他自变量的相关性几乎为零。我们可以得出结论,想成为运动机能学学生的学生(和其他高中毕业生一样)不喜欢学校的科目,也不喜欢学校,但这项研究表明,他们确实喜欢学习与学校无关的新事物,所以老师/教授可能会考虑在教学中加入课外材料,使规定的材料更有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes of Wannabe Kinesiology Students about School Subjects, School in General and Extracurricular Learning
The aim of this research was to determine and explain the attitudes of wannabe students of kinesiology regarding how much they like each school subject, school in general and extracurricular learning. The answers in the questionnaire were given on a semantic differential scale from 1 (100% repulsive to me) to 5 (I adore it). The study involved 63 wannabe kinesiology students who in 2021 actively prepared for the entrance exam at the Croatian Faculties of Kinesiology. The average age of the respondents was M=18.83±1.33, of which 25 girls and 38 boys. The average rating of all school subjects was M=3.14. The highest rated subject was expectedly Physical Education, but the second-best rated subject (geography) had an average rating of M=3.57. Significant difference between the rating of each school subject from the average of all school subjects was noticed in chemistry, physics and mathematics (on a negative pole compared to the average) and geography on the positive pole, with a medium to large effect size regarding the difference between arithmetic means. Extracurricular learning was almost zero correlated with all other independent variables. We can conclude that wannabe kinesiology students (aligned with other high school graduates) are not fond of school subjects, nor school in general, but this research shows they do love to learn new things not related to school, so teachers/professors might consider including extracurricular material in teaching to make prescribed material more interesting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegium Antropologicum
Collegium Antropologicum Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International journal Collegium Antropologicum is the official journal of the Croatian Antropological Society and is jointly published by: Croatian Anthropological Society Croatian Association of Medical Anthropology - Croatian Medical Association Department of Natural Sciences, Anthropological Centre and the Scientific Council for Anthropological Research of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. With the numerous international recognition of co-operative experts, the Journal represents a relevant reference source in the fields of cultural and biological anthropology, sociology, ethnology, psychology, demography, history, archaeology, genetics, biomedicine, human ecology, nutrition and other fields related to multidisciplinary character of anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信