Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Luceta McRoy, J. Epane, Larry R. Hearld, R. Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"私有化对效率和生产力的影响:以美国公立医院为例","authors":"Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Luceta McRoy, J. Epane, Larry R. Hearld, R. Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public hospitals typically operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Research suggests that privatization is one of the strategies that struggling public hospitals adopt to stay competitive. The purpose of this study was to examine whether privatization of public hospitals enhances efficiency and productivity. We used a national sample of non-federal acute care public hospitals in 1997 that was tracked through 2013, resulting in a cohort of 436 hospitals (7,386 hospital-year observations). Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. Efficiency was measured by current assets turnover (CATO), fixed assets turnover (FATO), occupancy rate, full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per occupied bed, and work hours per adjusted patient day. Productivity was measured by case mix adjusted admissions per FTE. We controlled for organizational and market factors. Linear regressions with hospital and year fixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Privatization from public to private status was associated with increased efficiency in terms of its positive associations with CATO (β =0.63) and FATO (β =0.23) and its negative association with FTE employees per occupied bed (β =-0.93) all at (p ≤ 0.001). Privatization was associated with increased productivity (β= 0.83; p ≤ 0.001).","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"2015 1","pages":"16073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Privatization on Efficiency and Productivity: The Case of American Public Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Luceta McRoy, J. Epane, Larry R. Hearld, R. Weech-Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public hospitals typically operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Research suggests that privatization is one of the strategies that struggling public hospitals adopt to stay competitive. The purpose of this study was to examine whether privatization of public hospitals enhances efficiency and productivity. We used a national sample of non-federal acute care public hospitals in 1997 that was tracked through 2013, resulting in a cohort of 436 hospitals (7,386 hospital-year observations). Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. Efficiency was measured by current assets turnover (CATO), fixed assets turnover (FATO), occupancy rate, full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per occupied bed, and work hours per adjusted patient day. Productivity was measured by case mix adjusted admissions per FTE. We controlled for organizational and market factors. Linear regressions with hospital and year fixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Privatization from public to private status was associated with increased efficiency in terms of its positive associations with CATO (β =0.63) and FATO (β =0.23) and its negative association with FTE employees per occupied bed (β =-0.93) all at (p ≤ 0.001). Privatization was associated with increased productivity (β= 0.83; p ≤ 0.001).\",\"PeriodicalId\":56181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"16073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Privatization on Efficiency and Productivity: The Case of American Public Hospitals
Public hospitals typically operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Research suggests that privatization is one of the strategies that struggling public hospitals adopt to stay competitive. The purpose of this study was to examine whether privatization of public hospitals enhances efficiency and productivity. We used a national sample of non-federal acute care public hospitals in 1997 that was tracked through 2013, resulting in a cohort of 436 hospitals (7,386 hospital-year observations). Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. Efficiency was measured by current assets turnover (CATO), fixed assets turnover (FATO), occupancy rate, full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per occupied bed, and work hours per adjusted patient day. Productivity was measured by case mix adjusted admissions per FTE. We controlled for organizational and market factors. Linear regressions with hospital and year fixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Privatization from public to private status was associated with increased efficiency in terms of its positive associations with CATO (β =0.63) and FATO (β =0.23) and its negative association with FTE employees per occupied bed (β =-0.93) all at (p ≤ 0.001). Privatization was associated with increased productivity (β= 0.83; p ≤ 0.001).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.