与狄俄尼索斯共舞:理查德·施特劳斯和约瑟夫·格里高尔的leucippus和Daphne的神话

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica Pub Date : 2016-09-13 DOI:10.5209/AMAL.51761

Manuel Antonio Díaz Gito

{"title":"与狄俄尼索斯共舞:理查德·施特劳斯和约瑟夫·格里高尔的leucippus和Daphne的神话","authors":"Manuel Antonio Díaz Gito","doi":"10.5209/AMAL.51761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First part of a two-section article that analyses the extensive reinterpretation of Daphne’s myth in the opera Daphne (1938) by composer Richard Strauss and librettist Joseph Gregor, who used the version of the myth by Parthenius of Nicaea better than that by Ovid. Itsultimate aim is to examine Strauss’ statement about his new opera’s meaning and if the authors managed to achieve their objective by means of manipulating the mythical storyline.","PeriodicalId":40412,"journal":{"name":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","volume":"8 1","pages":"23-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5209/AMAL.51761","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bailando con Dioniso: el mito de Leucipo y Daphne de Richard Strauss y Joseph Gregor\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Antonio Díaz Gito\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/AMAL.51761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First part of a two-section article that analyses the extensive reinterpretation of Daphne’s myth in the opera Daphne (1938) by composer Richard Strauss and librettist Joseph Gregor, who used the version of the myth by Parthenius of Nicaea better than that by Ovid. Itsultimate aim is to examine Strauss’ statement about his new opera’s meaning and if the authors managed to achieve their objective by means of manipulating the mythical storyline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"23-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5209/AMAL.51761\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.51761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.51761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分两部分，分析作曲家理查德·施特劳斯和剧作家约瑟夫·格雷戈尔在歌剧《达芙妮》(1938)中对达芙妮神话的广泛重新诠释，他们对尼西亚帕提纽斯的神话版本的使用比奥维德的版本更好。它的最终目的是检验施特劳斯关于他的新歌剧的意义的声明，以及作者是否通过操纵神话故事情节来达到他们的目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bailando con Dioniso: el mito de Leucipo y Daphne de Richard Strauss y Joseph Gregor

First part of a two-section article that analyses the extensive reinterpretation of Daphne’s myth in the opera Daphne (1938) by composer Richard Strauss and librettist Joseph Gregor, who used the version of the myth by Parthenius of Nicaea better than that by Ovid. Itsultimate aim is to examine Strauss’ statement about his new opera’s meaning and if the authors managed to achieve their objective by means of manipulating the mythical storyline.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

33 weeks

期刊介绍： Founded in 2008 by José Manuel Losada, Amaltea (ISSN-e 1989-1709) is a journal of myth criticism with intimate connections to Asteria, the International Association of Myth Criticism, and the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Its object of study is the way ancient, medieval and modern myths are perceived and adapted in literature and the arts from 1900 to the present day.