评价公立学校学习通用设计的教学法与实践

Q4 Social Sciences
Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura King, Jennifer Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts
{"title":"评价公立学校学习通用设计的教学法与实践","authors":"Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura King, Jennifer Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts","doi":"10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can education change to meet the demands of effectively educating an increasingly diverse student population with the skills, knowledge, and abilities they need to be productive and successful citizens in the 21st century? One possible solution is to create classrooms, teachers, and schools that embrace the progressive and inclusive practices espoused by Universal Design for Learning (UDL). In addition to being rooted in UDL pedagogy, classrooms designed to meet the challenge of 21st century education need to substantially integrate and utilize advances in technology. The vanguard of literature to date in UDL could be characterized as rhetorical advocacy. That is, UDL literature is in the early stages of introducing and promoting UDL pedagogy, but to date there is not a research base strong enough to establish UDL as a scientifically validated intervention (Edyburn, 2010). UDL might sound like a good idea, but until the research base turns the corner from advocating to assessing and measuring UDL outcomes, the promise of this approach will not be realized. This article describes a study exploring effects and outcomes of a professional development program on the perceptions and practice of UDL principles in K–12 public school inclusive classrooms, and could be one step toward bridging the gap from a good idea to a solidified best practice. Specifically, this study investigated a professional development program’s effect on teachers’ perceptions, conceptualizations, and implementation of UDL principles and practice in their classrooms. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 116 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Other Education Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Smith Canter, L., King, L. H., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D., & Rhys Myrick Potts, K. (2017) Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1-16. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss1/1 This Article Open Access after 1 year is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. Exceptionality Education International 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1–16 ISSN 1918-5227 1 Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura H. King, Jennifer B. Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts East Carolina University","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools\",\"authors\":\"Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura King, Jennifer Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How can education change to meet the demands of effectively educating an increasingly diverse student population with the skills, knowledge, and abilities they need to be productive and successful citizens in the 21st century? One possible solution is to create classrooms, teachers, and schools that embrace the progressive and inclusive practices espoused by Universal Design for Learning (UDL). In addition to being rooted in UDL pedagogy, classrooms designed to meet the challenge of 21st century education need to substantially integrate and utilize advances in technology. The vanguard of literature to date in UDL could be characterized as rhetorical advocacy. That is, UDL literature is in the early stages of introducing and promoting UDL pedagogy, but to date there is not a research base strong enough to establish UDL as a scientifically validated intervention (Edyburn, 2010). UDL might sound like a good idea, but until the research base turns the corner from advocating to assessing and measuring UDL outcomes, the promise of this approach will not be realized. This article describes a study exploring effects and outcomes of a professional development program on the perceptions and practice of UDL principles in K–12 public school inclusive classrooms, and could be one step toward bridging the gap from a good idea to a solidified best practice. Specifically, this study investigated a professional development program’s effect on teachers’ perceptions, conceptualizations, and implementation of UDL principles and practice in their classrooms. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 116 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Other Education Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Smith Canter, L., King, L. H., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D., & Rhys Myrick Potts, K. (2017) Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1-16. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss1/1 This Article Open Access after 1 year is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. Exceptionality Education International 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1–16 ISSN 1918-5227 1 Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura H. King, Jennifer B. Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts East Carolina University\",\"PeriodicalId\":38584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality Education International\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality Education International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

教育如何变革才能满足有效教育日益多样化的学生群体的需求,向他们传授技能、知识和能力,使他们成为21世纪富有成效和成功的公民?一个可能的解决方案是创建教室、教师和学校,采用通用学习设计(UDL)所倡导的进步和包容性实践。为了迎接21世纪教育的挑战,教室的设计除了要植根于UDL教学法之外,还需要充分整合和利用先进的技术。迄今为止,UDL文学的先锋可以被描述为修辞性的倡导。也就是说,UDL文献在介绍和推广UDL教学法方面处于早期阶段,但迄今为止还没有足够强大的研究基础来将UDL确立为一种经过科学验证的干预措施(Edyburn, 2010)。UDL可能听起来像一个好主意,但是直到研究基地从倡导到评估和度量UDL的结果转变过来,这种方法的承诺才会实现。本文描述了一项研究,该研究探索了一个专业发展项目对K-12公立学校包容性课堂中UDL原则的认知和实践的影响和结果,这可能是弥合从一个好主意到一个固化的最佳实践之间差距的一步。具体而言,本研究调查了专业发展计划对教师在课堂上对UDL原则和实践的感知、概念化和实施的影响。《教育评估、评估和研究公地》、《教育方法公地》、《其他教育公地》以及《特殊教育和教学公地》的部分内容请访问:https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei。推荐引用Smith center, L., King, L. H., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D., & Rhys Myrick Potts, K.(2017)评估公立学校学习通用设计的教学法和实践。国际卓越教育,27,1-16。检索自https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss1/1这篇文章开放获取后1年是由Scholarship@Western带给你的。它已被Scholarship@Western的授权管理员接受纳入例外教育国际。欲了解更多信息,请联系jspecht@uwo.ca。《公立学校学习通用设计的教学方法与实践评估:劳拉·李·史密斯中心、劳拉·h·金、詹妮弗·b·威廉姆斯、黛比·梅特卡夫、凯瑟琳·里斯·迈里克·波茨东卡罗莱纳大学》,2017年第27卷,第1期,第1页,第1 - 16页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools
How can education change to meet the demands of effectively educating an increasingly diverse student population with the skills, knowledge, and abilities they need to be productive and successful citizens in the 21st century? One possible solution is to create classrooms, teachers, and schools that embrace the progressive and inclusive practices espoused by Universal Design for Learning (UDL). In addition to being rooted in UDL pedagogy, classrooms designed to meet the challenge of 21st century education need to substantially integrate and utilize advances in technology. The vanguard of literature to date in UDL could be characterized as rhetorical advocacy. That is, UDL literature is in the early stages of introducing and promoting UDL pedagogy, but to date there is not a research base strong enough to establish UDL as a scientifically validated intervention (Edyburn, 2010). UDL might sound like a good idea, but until the research base turns the corner from advocating to assessing and measuring UDL outcomes, the promise of this approach will not be realized. This article describes a study exploring effects and outcomes of a professional development program on the perceptions and practice of UDL principles in K–12 public school inclusive classrooms, and could be one step toward bridging the gap from a good idea to a solidified best practice. Specifically, this study investigated a professional development program’s effect on teachers’ perceptions, conceptualizations, and implementation of UDL principles and practice in their classrooms. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 116 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Other Education Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Smith Canter, L., King, L. H., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D., & Rhys Myrick Potts, K. (2017) Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1-16. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss1/1 This Article Open Access after 1 year is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. Exceptionality Education International 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1–16 ISSN 1918-5227 1 Evaluating Pedagogy and Practice of Universal Design for Learning in Public Schools Lora Lee Smith Canter, Laura H. King, Jennifer B. Williams, Debbie Metcalf, Katheryne Rhys Myrick Potts East Carolina University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信