sbv improved诊断特征挑战中肺腺癌和鳞状细胞癌样本的基因表达谱分类

Rotem Ben-Hamo, S. Boué, F. Martin, M. Talikka, S. Efroni
{"title":"sbv improved诊断特征挑战中肺腺癌和鳞状细胞癌样本的基因表达谱分类","authors":"Rotem Ben-Hamo, S. Boué, F. Martin, M. Talikka, S. Efroni","doi":"10.4161/sysb.25983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Barriers, such as the lack of confidence in the robustness of disease signatures based on gene expression measurements, still hinder progress toward personalized medicine. It is therefore important that once derived, a signature is verified via an unbiased process. The IMPROVER initiative was set up to establish an impartial view of methods and results for the classification of patients, based on molecular profiles of disease-relevant or surrogate tissues. Here, the focus is on the Lung Cancer Signature Challenge, in which participants have been asked to classify lung tumor gene expression profiles into 4 classes: adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), each at either stage 1 or 2. The method reported here was the best performing method in the 4-way classification. The original method is presented as well as an algorithmic approach to replace the empirical (non-computational) steps used in the challenge. In the discussion, the difficulty in classifying stages of tumors as compared with the relatively good classification of subtypes is examined. Hypotheses are made concerning possible reasons for erroneous classification of some of the samples, in view of additional information on the test samples that was not made available to challenge participants.","PeriodicalId":90057,"journal":{"name":"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"268 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/sysb.25983","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma samples based on their gene expression profile in the sbv IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Ben-Hamo, S. Boué, F. Martin, M. Talikka, S. Efroni\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/sysb.25983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Barriers, such as the lack of confidence in the robustness of disease signatures based on gene expression measurements, still hinder progress toward personalized medicine. It is therefore important that once derived, a signature is verified via an unbiased process. The IMPROVER initiative was set up to establish an impartial view of methods and results for the classification of patients, based on molecular profiles of disease-relevant or surrogate tissues. Here, the focus is on the Lung Cancer Signature Challenge, in which participants have been asked to classify lung tumor gene expression profiles into 4 classes: adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), each at either stage 1 or 2. The method reported here was the best performing method in the 4-way classification. The original method is presented as well as an algorithmic approach to replace the empirical (non-computational) steps used in the challenge. In the discussion, the difficulty in classifying stages of tumors as compared with the relatively good classification of subtypes is examined. Hypotheses are made concerning possible reasons for erroneous classification of some of the samples, in view of additional information on the test samples that was not made available to challenge participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"268 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/sysb.25983\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/sysb.25983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/sysb.25983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

一些障碍,如对基于基因表达测量的疾病特征的稳健性缺乏信心,仍然阻碍着个性化医疗的进展。因此,重要的是,一旦导出,通过公正的过程验证签名。基于疾病相关组织或替代组织的分子特征,建立了对患者分类的方法和结果的公正观点。在这里,重点是肺癌特征挑战,参与者被要求将肺肿瘤基因表达谱分为4类:腺癌(AC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC),每一种都处于1期或2期。本文报道的方法是四向分类中表现最好的方法。提出了原始方法以及一种算法方法来取代挑战中使用的经验(非计算)步骤。在讨论中,与相对良好的亚型分类相比,肿瘤分期分类的困难被检查。鉴于没有向挑战参与者提供有关测试样本的额外信息,对某些样本分类错误的可能原因进行了假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma samples based on their gene expression profile in the sbv IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge
Barriers, such as the lack of confidence in the robustness of disease signatures based on gene expression measurements, still hinder progress toward personalized medicine. It is therefore important that once derived, a signature is verified via an unbiased process. The IMPROVER initiative was set up to establish an impartial view of methods and results for the classification of patients, based on molecular profiles of disease-relevant or surrogate tissues. Here, the focus is on the Lung Cancer Signature Challenge, in which participants have been asked to classify lung tumor gene expression profiles into 4 classes: adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), each at either stage 1 or 2. The method reported here was the best performing method in the 4-way classification. The original method is presented as well as an algorithmic approach to replace the empirical (non-computational) steps used in the challenge. In the discussion, the difficulty in classifying stages of tumors as compared with the relatively good classification of subtypes is examined. Hypotheses are made concerning possible reasons for erroneous classification of some of the samples, in view of additional information on the test samples that was not made available to challenge participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信