《吸血鬼瓦尔尼》中的家庭情节与阶级改革

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Brooke Cameron
{"title":"《吸血鬼瓦尔尼》中的家庭情节与阶级改革","authors":"Brooke Cameron","doi":"10.46911/vjxp7684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First published serially 1845–7, James Malcolm Rymer’s Varney the Vampire taps into the emergent class tensions of its period. The novel’s running focus on marriage reads as a critical response to recent Sanitation Acts and, specifically, social reformers’ preoccupation with rewriting working-class domestic plots and spaces. However, in Varney, such domestic plots remain elusive as the eponymous vampire repeatedly fails to find true love (“companionate marriage”) as a cure for his monstrous condition; instead, time and again, Varney’s romantic adventures uncover the real monsters to be the middle- and upper-class humans who seek to profit, vampire-like, by pushing their daughters into mercenary marriages (“kinship marriage”). While, in typical Gothic fashion, Rymer’s penny dreadful imagines how the past informs the present, Varney is also astonishingly forward-looking with its critique of domestic plots haunted by structures of kinship. At the same time, Varney implicitly acknowledges that the working class had its own marriage model – one built upon working wives’ equal economic contribution – and thereby encourages these same readers to question, if not reject, middle-class domestic models as a solution to their social problems.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domestic Plots and Class Reform in Varney the Vampire\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.46911/vjxp7684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First published serially 1845–7, James Malcolm Rymer’s Varney the Vampire taps into the emergent class tensions of its period. The novel’s running focus on marriage reads as a critical response to recent Sanitation Acts and, specifically, social reformers’ preoccupation with rewriting working-class domestic plots and spaces. However, in Varney, such domestic plots remain elusive as the eponymous vampire repeatedly fails to find true love (“companionate marriage”) as a cure for his monstrous condition; instead, time and again, Varney’s romantic adventures uncover the real monsters to be the middle- and upper-class humans who seek to profit, vampire-like, by pushing their daughters into mercenary marriages (“kinship marriage”). While, in typical Gothic fashion, Rymer’s penny dreadful imagines how the past informs the present, Varney is also astonishingly forward-looking with its critique of domestic plots haunted by structures of kinship. At the same time, Varney implicitly acknowledges that the working class had its own marriage model – one built upon working wives’ equal economic contribution – and thereby encourages these same readers to question, if not reject, middle-class domestic models as a solution to their social problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46911/vjxp7684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/vjxp7684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

詹姆斯·马尔科姆·赖默(James Malcolm Rymer)的《吸血鬼瓦尼》(Varney the Vampire)于1845年至1847年首次连载,揭示了那个时代新兴的阶级紧张关系。小说对婚姻的持续关注读起来是对最近的《卫生法案》的一种批判回应,特别是对社会改革者专注于改写工人阶级家庭情节和空间的回应。然而,在《瓦尔尼》中,这样的家庭情节仍然难以捉摸,因为同名吸血鬼一再未能找到真爱(“伴侣婚姻”)来治愈他的怪物状态;相反,一次次地,瓦尼的浪漫冒险揭示了真正的怪物是中上层社会的人类,他们像吸血鬼一样,通过强迫自己的女儿嫁给雇佣兵(“亲属婚姻”)来寻求利益。在典型的哥特风格中,赖默的《可怕的penny》想象了过去是如何影响现在的,而瓦尼对受亲属关系结构困扰的家庭情节的批判也令人惊讶地具有前瞻性。同时,Varney含蓄地承认工人阶级有自己的婚姻模式——一种建立在工作妻子平等的经济贡献之上的婚姻模式——从而鼓励这些读者质疑,如果不是拒绝,中产阶级家庭模式作为解决他们社会问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Domestic Plots and Class Reform in Varney the Vampire
First published serially 1845–7, James Malcolm Rymer’s Varney the Vampire taps into the emergent class tensions of its period. The novel’s running focus on marriage reads as a critical response to recent Sanitation Acts and, specifically, social reformers’ preoccupation with rewriting working-class domestic plots and spaces. However, in Varney, such domestic plots remain elusive as the eponymous vampire repeatedly fails to find true love (“companionate marriage”) as a cure for his monstrous condition; instead, time and again, Varney’s romantic adventures uncover the real monsters to be the middle- and upper-class humans who seek to profit, vampire-like, by pushing their daughters into mercenary marriages (“kinship marriage”). While, in typical Gothic fashion, Rymer’s penny dreadful imagines how the past informs the present, Varney is also astonishingly forward-looking with its critique of domestic plots haunted by structures of kinship. At the same time, Varney implicitly acknowledges that the working class had its own marriage model – one built upon working wives’ equal economic contribution – and thereby encourages these same readers to question, if not reject, middle-class domestic models as a solution to their social problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victorian Popular Fictions
Victorian Popular Fictions Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信