{"title":"校园反种族主义规则:冲突中的宪法叙事","authors":"R. Delgado","doi":"10.4324/9781315633732-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.","PeriodicalId":47587,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern University Law Review","volume":"85 1","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision\",\"authors\":\"R. Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315633732-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northwestern University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"237-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northwestern University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633732-26\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633732-26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision
Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.
期刊介绍:
The Northwestern University Law Review is a student-operated journal that publishes four issues of high-quality, general legal scholarship each year. Student editors make the editorial and organizational decisions and select articles submitted by professors, judges, and practitioners, as well as student pieces.