馆内资料利用计量的可行性及其在公共图书馆管理中的适用性

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Itoga, Y. Emoto, Hana Kwak
{"title":"馆内资料利用计量的可行性及其在公共图书馆管理中的适用性","authors":"M. Itoga, Y. Emoto, Hana Kwak","doi":"10.46895/lis.69.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research aimed to verify the feasibility and usefulness of measuring the amount of in-library use, in the context of two main ways of using public libraries: staying a long time to study and learn, or stopping by just to borrow or return books. The study also aimed to determine the significance of measuring the amount of in-library use for library management. Methods: Two types of survey were carried out: unobtrusive observation by staff tours of four public libraries, or questionnaires handed out to the users of those libraries on the same day as the observation. The purpose of both surveys was to estimate the whole time of in-library material use. The subjects were two prefectural and two municipal libraries in Japan which had different management and service policies. The analysis compared these two methods and examined the results in detail in terms of reliability and consistency, to validate such differences among public libraries. Results: Quantitative measurement of in-library material use is applicable to various management and research situations as follows: 1) The whole in-library materials use time varies greatly, and the time per visitor varies according to the libraries’ management and service policies. Therefore, these measures are able to reflect the quantity of materials used by library users visiting for selfstudy and/or self-learning. 2) These measures are a useful set of management tools because they reveal actual use by all library visitors. 3) Simulated observation by various time intervals shows that observation every hour is sufficient to estimate the whole in-library use time. This finding","PeriodicalId":42468,"journal":{"name":"Library and Information Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of measuring the in-library material use and its applicability to public library management\",\"authors\":\"M. Itoga, Y. Emoto, Hana Kwak\",\"doi\":\"10.46895/lis.69.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This research aimed to verify the feasibility and usefulness of measuring the amount of in-library use, in the context of two main ways of using public libraries: staying a long time to study and learn, or stopping by just to borrow or return books. The study also aimed to determine the significance of measuring the amount of in-library use for library management. Methods: Two types of survey were carried out: unobtrusive observation by staff tours of four public libraries, or questionnaires handed out to the users of those libraries on the same day as the observation. The purpose of both surveys was to estimate the whole time of in-library material use. The subjects were two prefectural and two municipal libraries in Japan which had different management and service policies. The analysis compared these two methods and examined the results in detail in terms of reliability and consistency, to validate such differences among public libraries. Results: Quantitative measurement of in-library material use is applicable to various management and research situations as follows: 1) The whole in-library materials use time varies greatly, and the time per visitor varies according to the libraries’ management and service policies. Therefore, these measures are able to reflect the quantity of materials used by library users visiting for selfstudy and/or self-learning. 2) These measures are a useful set of management tools because they reveal actual use by all library visitors. 3) Simulated observation by various time intervals shows that observation every hour is sufficient to estimate the whole in-library use time. This finding\",\"PeriodicalId\":42468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library and Information Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library and Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46895/lis.69.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46895/lis.69.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在验证在公共图书馆的两种主要使用方式:长时间停留学习和停留借书或还书的情况下,测量图书馆内使用量的可行性和有用性。本研究还旨在确定测量图书馆内使用量对图书馆管理的意义。方法:采用两种方式进行调查:一种是由工作人员到四家公共图书馆进行不引人注意的观察,另一种是在观察当天向图书馆用户发放调查问卷。这两项调查的目的都是估计图书馆内资料使用的全部时间。研究对象为日本两个县立图书馆和两个市立图书馆,它们的管理和服务政策不同。分析比较了这两种方法,并在可靠性和一致性方面详细检查了结果,以验证公共图书馆之间的这种差异。结果:馆内资料利用的定量测量适用于各种管理和研究情况:1)馆内资料的整体使用时间差异较大,每位访客的使用时间因图书馆的管理和服务政策而异。因此,这些措施能够反映图书馆自习和/或自学用户使用的资料数量。这些措施是一套有用的管理工具,因为它们揭示了所有图书馆访客的实际使用情况。3)不同时间间隔的模拟观测表明,每小时的观测足以估计整个图书馆的使用时间。这一发现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of measuring the in-library material use and its applicability to public library management
Purpose: This research aimed to verify the feasibility and usefulness of measuring the amount of in-library use, in the context of two main ways of using public libraries: staying a long time to study and learn, or stopping by just to borrow or return books. The study also aimed to determine the significance of measuring the amount of in-library use for library management. Methods: Two types of survey were carried out: unobtrusive observation by staff tours of four public libraries, or questionnaires handed out to the users of those libraries on the same day as the observation. The purpose of both surveys was to estimate the whole time of in-library material use. The subjects were two prefectural and two municipal libraries in Japan which had different management and service policies. The analysis compared these two methods and examined the results in detail in terms of reliability and consistency, to validate such differences among public libraries. Results: Quantitative measurement of in-library material use is applicable to various management and research situations as follows: 1) The whole in-library materials use time varies greatly, and the time per visitor varies according to the libraries’ management and service policies. Therefore, these measures are able to reflect the quantity of materials used by library users visiting for selfstudy and/or self-learning. 2) These measures are a useful set of management tools because they reveal actual use by all library visitors. 3) Simulated observation by various time intervals shows that observation every hour is sufficient to estimate the whole in-library use time. This finding
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library and Information Science
Library and Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library and Information Science is the official journal of the Mita Society for Library and Information Science. It is issued semiannually and prepared by the Editorial Committee of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信