仓鼠的空间记忆:在桡臂迷宫中消耗/补充环境和预选择行为

Q3 Psychology
Maryed Rojas Leguizamon, Nataly Yáñez, Felipe Cabrera
{"title":"仓鼠的空间记忆:在桡臂迷宫中消耗/补充环境和预选择行为","authors":"Maryed Rojas Leguizamon, Nataly Yáñez, Felipe Cabrera","doi":"10.46867/ijcp.2019.32.00.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rodents’ spatial memory is traditionally assessed in the radial arm-maze (RAM). An accurate response pattern in the RAM is described as the tendency to visit a new arm after each choice (i.e. win-shift strategy). When this response pattern is found, it is said that the animal remembers the places visited. In the present experiment, 12 hamsters were assessed in the RAM under two conditions: the depleting condition, in which feeders were not rebaited after each visit; and the replenishing condition, in which, feeders were rebaited. We registered the number of new arms visited (hits), the time spent in the central area of the maze, and the behaviors emitted in the central area before each arm choice. Results showed that, regardless of condition, animals were significantly more likely to visit new arms. However, more pre-choice behaviors and a longer center time were observed in the depleting condition than in the replenishing one. It is discussed that hamsters have a win-shift strategy for hoarding behavior even when they do not need to remember the places visited, though they exhibited more pre-choice behaviors when searching for food in the depleting condition.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Memory in Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus):Depleting/replenishing Environments and Pre-choiceBehaviors in the Radial Arm Maze\",\"authors\":\"Maryed Rojas Leguizamon, Nataly Yáñez, Felipe Cabrera\",\"doi\":\"10.46867/ijcp.2019.32.00.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rodents’ spatial memory is traditionally assessed in the radial arm-maze (RAM). An accurate response pattern in the RAM is described as the tendency to visit a new arm after each choice (i.e. win-shift strategy). When this response pattern is found, it is said that the animal remembers the places visited. In the present experiment, 12 hamsters were assessed in the RAM under two conditions: the depleting condition, in which feeders were not rebaited after each visit; and the replenishing condition, in which, feeders were rebaited. We registered the number of new arms visited (hits), the time spent in the central area of the maze, and the behaviors emitted in the central area before each arm choice. Results showed that, regardless of condition, animals were significantly more likely to visit new arms. However, more pre-choice behaviors and a longer center time were observed in the depleting condition than in the replenishing one. It is discussed that hamsters have a win-shift strategy for hoarding behavior even when they do not need to remember the places visited, though they exhibited more pre-choice behaviors when searching for food in the depleting condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2019.32.00.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2019.32.00.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

啮齿类动物的空间记忆通常是通过径向臂迷宫(RAM)来评估的。RAM中的准确反应模式被描述为每次选择后访问新手臂的趋势(即win-shift策略)。当这种反应模式被发现时,据说动物会记住去过的地方。在本实验中,12只仓鼠在RAM中进行了两种情况的评估:消耗状态,喂食者每次访问后不重新喂食;以及补料条件,在补料条件下,喂食器被重新喂食。我们记录了新手臂的访问量(点击),在迷宫中心区域花费的时间,以及在每个手臂选择之前在中心区域发出的行为。结果表明,无论条件如何,动物都更有可能访问新的手臂。而消耗条件下的预选择行为较多,中心时间较补充条件下长。尽管仓鼠在消耗条件下寻找食物时表现出更多的预先选择行为,但即使在不需要记住去过的地方时,仓鼠也有一种双赢的囤积行为策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial Memory in Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus):Depleting/replenishing Environments and Pre-choiceBehaviors in the Radial Arm Maze
Rodents’ spatial memory is traditionally assessed in the radial arm-maze (RAM). An accurate response pattern in the RAM is described as the tendency to visit a new arm after each choice (i.e. win-shift strategy). When this response pattern is found, it is said that the animal remembers the places visited. In the present experiment, 12 hamsters were assessed in the RAM under two conditions: the depleting condition, in which feeders were not rebaited after each visit; and the replenishing condition, in which, feeders were rebaited. We registered the number of new arms visited (hits), the time spent in the central area of the maze, and the behaviors emitted in the central area before each arm choice. Results showed that, regardless of condition, animals were significantly more likely to visit new arms. However, more pre-choice behaviors and a longer center time were observed in the depleting condition than in the replenishing one. It is discussed that hamsters have a win-shift strategy for hoarding behavior even when they do not need to remember the places visited, though they exhibited more pre-choice behaviors when searching for food in the depleting condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信