股东及其对幸福的追求:对公司的统一认识

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
J. Mcconvill, M. Bagaric
{"title":"股东及其对幸福的追求:对公司的统一认识","authors":"J. Mcconvill, M. Bagaric","doi":"10.4324/9781003076513-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors contend that the interests of shareholders must be the paramount concern of the corporation, an implication arising from the status of shareholders as being the 'owners' of the corporation - the corporation being a legal entity comprised of shares for which shareholders have a proprietary interest in. According to the authors however, giving primacy to the interests of shareholders in the context of corporate law and governance does not necessarily involve undermining or ignoring the interests of other stakeholders such as creditors, employees and other participants in society. Nor does it mean that the corporation is simply a legal construct devoid of any social role or influence. Rather, due to the enormous amount of economic activity for which corporations are responsible and the vast number of people employed by, or dependent on the financial success of corporations, the corporation must inevitably be seen as a social institution. Further, as the authors will argue, if we go back to basics and recognise that shareholders are individuals, and each and every aspect of individual activity- including the purchase and disposal of shares - is guided by the pursuit of personal happiness (either explicitly or implicitly), then corporations can give primacy to the interests of shareholders, and still act in the best interests of other stakeholders (such as employees, creditors and the community in general). Recent empirical studies show that there is (at best) a weak correlation between personal happiness and levels of material wealth. Corporations can still give primacy to the interests of shareholders whilst not having to explicitly set out to maximise profits. Once we appreciate the simple yet undisputable point that the corporation is just another form of human activity carried out to assist in the fulfilment of personal happiness, complex theories of the firm and books and articles pondering over how companies can manage shareholder interests can be assigned to the dustbin of legal history.","PeriodicalId":52047,"journal":{"name":"Adelaide Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shareholders and their Pursuit of Happiness: A Unifying Understanding of the Corporation\",\"authors\":\"J. Mcconvill, M. Bagaric\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003076513-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the authors contend that the interests of shareholders must be the paramount concern of the corporation, an implication arising from the status of shareholders as being the 'owners' of the corporation - the corporation being a legal entity comprised of shares for which shareholders have a proprietary interest in. According to the authors however, giving primacy to the interests of shareholders in the context of corporate law and governance does not necessarily involve undermining or ignoring the interests of other stakeholders such as creditors, employees and other participants in society. Nor does it mean that the corporation is simply a legal construct devoid of any social role or influence. Rather, due to the enormous amount of economic activity for which corporations are responsible and the vast number of people employed by, or dependent on the financial success of corporations, the corporation must inevitably be seen as a social institution. Further, as the authors will argue, if we go back to basics and recognise that shareholders are individuals, and each and every aspect of individual activity- including the purchase and disposal of shares - is guided by the pursuit of personal happiness (either explicitly or implicitly), then corporations can give primacy to the interests of shareholders, and still act in the best interests of other stakeholders (such as employees, creditors and the community in general). Recent empirical studies show that there is (at best) a weak correlation between personal happiness and levels of material wealth. Corporations can still give primacy to the interests of shareholders whilst not having to explicitly set out to maximise profits. Once we appreciate the simple yet undisputable point that the corporation is just another form of human activity carried out to assist in the fulfilment of personal happiness, complex theories of the firm and books and articles pondering over how companies can manage shareholder interests can be assigned to the dustbin of legal history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adelaide Law Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adelaide Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003076513-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adelaide Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003076513-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,作者认为股东的利益必须是公司最关心的问题,这一含义源于股东作为公司“所有者”的地位——公司是由股东拥有专有权益的股份组成的法律实体。然而,根据作者的说法,在公司法和公司治理的背景下,将股东的利益放在首位并不一定涉及损害或忽视其他利益相关者的利益,如债权人、雇员和其他社会参与者。这也不意味着公司只是一个没有任何社会角色或影响力的法律结构。相反,由于公司负责的大量经济活动,以及公司雇用或依赖公司财务成功的大量人员,公司不可避免地必须被视为一种社会机构。此外,正如作者将论证的那样,如果我们回到基础,认识到股东是个人,个人活动的每一个方面——包括购买和处置股票——都是由追求个人幸福(无论是明确的还是隐含的)所引导的,那么公司就可以把股东的利益放在首位,同时仍然以其他利益相关者(如员工、债权人和整个社区)的最佳利益为目标行事。最近的实证研究表明,个人幸福与物质财富水平之间(充其量)存在微弱的相关性。公司仍然可以把股东的利益放在首位,而不必明确设定利润最大化。一旦我们理解了公司只是另一种形式的人类活动,以帮助实现个人幸福这一简单而无可争议的观点,那么,关于公司的复杂理论,以及思考公司如何管理股东利益的书籍和文章,就可以被扔进法律史的垃圾箱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shareholders and their Pursuit of Happiness: A Unifying Understanding of the Corporation
In this article, the authors contend that the interests of shareholders must be the paramount concern of the corporation, an implication arising from the status of shareholders as being the 'owners' of the corporation - the corporation being a legal entity comprised of shares for which shareholders have a proprietary interest in. According to the authors however, giving primacy to the interests of shareholders in the context of corporate law and governance does not necessarily involve undermining or ignoring the interests of other stakeholders such as creditors, employees and other participants in society. Nor does it mean that the corporation is simply a legal construct devoid of any social role or influence. Rather, due to the enormous amount of economic activity for which corporations are responsible and the vast number of people employed by, or dependent on the financial success of corporations, the corporation must inevitably be seen as a social institution. Further, as the authors will argue, if we go back to basics and recognise that shareholders are individuals, and each and every aspect of individual activity- including the purchase and disposal of shares - is guided by the pursuit of personal happiness (either explicitly or implicitly), then corporations can give primacy to the interests of shareholders, and still act in the best interests of other stakeholders (such as employees, creditors and the community in general). Recent empirical studies show that there is (at best) a weak correlation between personal happiness and levels of material wealth. Corporations can still give primacy to the interests of shareholders whilst not having to explicitly set out to maximise profits. Once we appreciate the simple yet undisputable point that the corporation is just another form of human activity carried out to assist in the fulfilment of personal happiness, complex theories of the firm and books and articles pondering over how companies can manage shareholder interests can be assigned to the dustbin of legal history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信