重新考虑资本资产定价模型:对南非市场上包括股票和债券在内的投资组合进行的实值测试

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
R. Thomson, T. Reddy
{"title":"重新考虑资本资产定价模型:对南非市场上包括股票和债券在内的投资组合进行的实值测试","authors":"R. Thomson, T. Reddy","doi":"10.4314/SAAJ.V13I1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper extends previous work of the authors to reconsider the capital-asset pricing model (CAPM) in South Africa in real terms. As in that work, the main question this study aimed to answer remains: Can the CAPM be accepted in the South African market for the purposes of the stochastic modelling of investment returns in typical actuarial applications? To test the CAPM in real terms, conventional and index-linked bonds were included both in the composition of the market portfolio and in tests of the securities market line. For the investigation, quarterly total returns from the FTSE/JSE all-share index listed on the JSE Securities Exchange from 30 September 1964 to 31 December 2010 were used, together with yields on government bonds and consumer price indices over the same period. As expressed in the securities market line, the CAPM suggests that higher systematic risk, as measured by beta, is associated with higher expected returns, and that the relationship between expected return and beta is linear. In this investigation the above-mentioned predictions of the CAPM were tested for the South African market. Regression tests both of the zero-beta and standard versions of the CAPM were made, using both prior betas and in-period betas. Hotelling's test was also applied, as well as a regression analysis. These tests were made for individual periods as well as for all periods combined.","PeriodicalId":40732,"journal":{"name":"South African Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The capital-asset pricing model reconsidered : tests in real terms on a South African market portfolio comprising equities and bonds\",\"authors\":\"R. Thomson, T. Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAAJ.V13I1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper extends previous work of the authors to reconsider the capital-asset pricing model (CAPM) in South Africa in real terms. As in that work, the main question this study aimed to answer remains: Can the CAPM be accepted in the South African market for the purposes of the stochastic modelling of investment returns in typical actuarial applications? To test the CAPM in real terms, conventional and index-linked bonds were included both in the composition of the market portfolio and in tests of the securities market line. For the investigation, quarterly total returns from the FTSE/JSE all-share index listed on the JSE Securities Exchange from 30 September 1964 to 31 December 2010 were used, together with yields on government bonds and consumer price indices over the same period. As expressed in the securities market line, the CAPM suggests that higher systematic risk, as measured by beta, is associated with higher expected returns, and that the relationship between expected return and beta is linear. In this investigation the above-mentioned predictions of the CAPM were tested for the South African market. Regression tests both of the zero-beta and standard versions of the CAPM were made, using both prior betas and in-period betas. Hotelling's test was also applied, as well as a regression analysis. These tests were made for individual periods as well as for all periods combined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V13I1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V13I1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文在前人研究的基础上,对南非实际资本资产定价模型(CAPM)进行了重新思考。正如在那项工作中一样,本研究旨在回答的主要问题仍然是:CAPM能否在南非市场上被接受,用于典型精算应用中投资回报的随机建模?为了检验实际的CAPM,传统债券和指数挂钩债券都被包括在市场投资组合的组成和证券市场线的测试中。在调查中,使用了1964年9月30日至2010年12月31日在JSE证券交易所上市的FTSE/JSE全股票指数的季度总回报,以及同期的政府债券收益率和消费者价格指数。正如证券市场线所表示的那样,CAPM表明,以beta衡量的较高的系统风险与较高的预期收益相关,并且预期收益与beta之间的关系是线性的。在本次调查中,上述预测的CAPM对南非市场进行了测试。对零beta和标准版本的CAPM进行了回归测试,使用先前beta和期间beta。采用Hotelling’s检验,并进行回归分析。这些测试是针对个别时期以及所有时期的组合进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The capital-asset pricing model reconsidered : tests in real terms on a South African market portfolio comprising equities and bonds
This paper extends previous work of the authors to reconsider the capital-asset pricing model (CAPM) in South Africa in real terms. As in that work, the main question this study aimed to answer remains: Can the CAPM be accepted in the South African market for the purposes of the stochastic modelling of investment returns in typical actuarial applications? To test the CAPM in real terms, conventional and index-linked bonds were included both in the composition of the market portfolio and in tests of the securities market line. For the investigation, quarterly total returns from the FTSE/JSE all-share index listed on the JSE Securities Exchange from 30 September 1964 to 31 December 2010 were used, together with yields on government bonds and consumer price indices over the same period. As expressed in the securities market line, the CAPM suggests that higher systematic risk, as measured by beta, is associated with higher expected returns, and that the relationship between expected return and beta is linear. In this investigation the above-mentioned predictions of the CAPM were tested for the South African market. Regression tests both of the zero-beta and standard versions of the CAPM were made, using both prior betas and in-period betas. Hotelling's test was also applied, as well as a regression analysis. These tests were made for individual periods as well as for all periods combined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Actuarial Journal
South African Actuarial Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信