{"title":"18世纪瑞典人眼中的凡尔赛宫","authors":"S. Rota","doi":"10.4000/crcv.18481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of Swedish descriptions of Versailles in the eighteenth century is just as rich and varied as that of the cultural and political relations between Sweden and France. This article focuses on three Swedish travellers’ accounts of Versailles : scientist Bengt Ferrner (1724–1802), nobleman Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt (1757–1814) and poet Frans Michael Franzen (1772–1847). While Ferrner’s descriptions from Paris abound in references to visits to the opera and theatre, his reaction to Versailles is one of indifference. The relation between Paris and Versailles is important for the appreciation of the latter also, in the diary of Baron Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt, who travelled together with King Gustav III in 1784. Armfelt’s position as a royal favourite gave him access to social and cultural circles that Ferrner was excluded from. Armfelt vividly describes the life of the court and gives a detailed account of the ceremonies that surrounded it. The two cities thus appear either in a conflicting relation, as in Ferrner’s case, or in a mutually reinforcing one, as in Armfelt’s diary. Finally, poet Frans Michael Franzen describes the post-revolutionary state of Versailles at the beginning of 1795. Attracted by revolutionary ideas, Franzen voices his aversion to absolutism in his description of the palace of Versailles, which, now deprived of the court, has lost its centrality. Although it is difficult to determine general trends from the writings of the three travellers, they reflect a growing disapproval of the ceremonies and glorification of French absolute monarchy, as epitomized by Versailles.","PeriodicalId":40149,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du Centre de Recherche du Chateau de Versailles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Versailles Through Swedish Eyes in the Eighteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"S. Rota\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/crcv.18481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The history of Swedish descriptions of Versailles in the eighteenth century is just as rich and varied as that of the cultural and political relations between Sweden and France. This article focuses on three Swedish travellers’ accounts of Versailles : scientist Bengt Ferrner (1724–1802), nobleman Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt (1757–1814) and poet Frans Michael Franzen (1772–1847). While Ferrner’s descriptions from Paris abound in references to visits to the opera and theatre, his reaction to Versailles is one of indifference. The relation between Paris and Versailles is important for the appreciation of the latter also, in the diary of Baron Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt, who travelled together with King Gustav III in 1784. Armfelt’s position as a royal favourite gave him access to social and cultural circles that Ferrner was excluded from. Armfelt vividly describes the life of the court and gives a detailed account of the ceremonies that surrounded it. The two cities thus appear either in a conflicting relation, as in Ferrner’s case, or in a mutually reinforcing one, as in Armfelt’s diary. Finally, poet Frans Michael Franzen describes the post-revolutionary state of Versailles at the beginning of 1795. Attracted by revolutionary ideas, Franzen voices his aversion to absolutism in his description of the palace of Versailles, which, now deprived of the court, has lost its centrality. Although it is difficult to determine general trends from the writings of the three travellers, they reflect a growing disapproval of the ceremonies and glorification of French absolute monarchy, as epitomized by Versailles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin du Centre de Recherche du Chateau de Versailles\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin du Centre de Recherche du Chateau de Versailles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/crcv.18481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du Centre de Recherche du Chateau de Versailles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/crcv.18481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
18世纪瑞典人对凡尔赛宫的描述,就像瑞典和法国之间的文化和政治关系一样丰富多彩。本文重点介绍了三位瑞典旅行者对凡尔赛宫的描述:科学家Bengt ferner(1724-1802),贵族Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt(1757-1814)和诗人Frans Michael Franzen(1772-1847)。虽然费纳在巴黎的描述中大量提到了歌剧和剧院的参观,但他对凡尔赛宫的反应却是漠不关心。巴黎和凡尔赛之间的关系对于后者的欣赏也很重要,在古斯塔夫·莫里茨·阿姆菲尔特男爵的日记中,他于1784年与古斯塔夫三世国王一起旅行。Armfelt作为王室宠儿的地位使他能够接触到Ferrner所排斥的社会和文化圈。Armfelt生动地描述了宫廷的生活,并详细描述了围绕它的仪式。因此,这两座城市要么呈现出一种相互冲突的关系,就像费纳所说的那样,要么呈现出一种相互加强的关系,就像Armfelt的日记所描述的那样。最后,诗人弗兰斯·迈克尔·弗兰岑描述了1795年初凡尔赛革命后的状态。受革命思想的吸引,弗兰岑在他对凡尔赛宫的描述中表达了他对专制主义的厌恶,凡尔赛宫现在被剥夺了法院,失去了中心地位。虽然很难从这三位旅行者的作品中确定总体趋势,但它们反映了人们对法国绝对君主制的仪式和美化的日益不满,正如凡尔赛宫所体现的那样。
Versailles Through Swedish Eyes in the Eighteenth Century
The history of Swedish descriptions of Versailles in the eighteenth century is just as rich and varied as that of the cultural and political relations between Sweden and France. This article focuses on three Swedish travellers’ accounts of Versailles : scientist Bengt Ferrner (1724–1802), nobleman Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt (1757–1814) and poet Frans Michael Franzen (1772–1847). While Ferrner’s descriptions from Paris abound in references to visits to the opera and theatre, his reaction to Versailles is one of indifference. The relation between Paris and Versailles is important for the appreciation of the latter also, in the diary of Baron Gustaf Mauritz Armfelt, who travelled together with King Gustav III in 1784. Armfelt’s position as a royal favourite gave him access to social and cultural circles that Ferrner was excluded from. Armfelt vividly describes the life of the court and gives a detailed account of the ceremonies that surrounded it. The two cities thus appear either in a conflicting relation, as in Ferrner’s case, or in a mutually reinforcing one, as in Armfelt’s diary. Finally, poet Frans Michael Franzen describes the post-revolutionary state of Versailles at the beginning of 1795. Attracted by revolutionary ideas, Franzen voices his aversion to absolutism in his description of the palace of Versailles, which, now deprived of the court, has lost its centrality. Although it is difficult to determine general trends from the writings of the three travellers, they reflect a growing disapproval of the ceremonies and glorification of French absolute monarchy, as epitomized by Versailles.