微观抵抗策略

H. Stratford
{"title":"微观抵抗策略","authors":"H. Stratford","doi":"10.4324/9780203003930-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-strategies of resistance are particular confrontations with and resistances to the local impositions of dominating power. These incremental moves are not assembled from direct confrontations but rather operate as discrete traces within a plurality of resistances. Through a feminist critique this paper explores the implications that such an approach to resistance practices may hold for a feminist project in terms of intersections of power relations and spatial practice.Micro-strategies: space and architectureThe practice of all architects is to some extent an interpretation of the context in which they are located, whether this interpretation takes the form of tacit or explicit representation. This theoretical paper has evolved from research which explores the work of various architects and groups who, in the early 1980s, questioned political and/or professional orthodoxies in architecture around them. The scope of that larger study stretches wide, geographically and politically, including a number of countries in political transition such as South Africa, Russia, Romania and East Germany. The groups studied include the Paper Architects, Utopica, Form-Trans-Inform and Matrix.(2)The enterprises of the kind I have explored tend to be politically motivated since they respond to the social and/or cultural condition within which they are situated, even if the material itself cannot, by definition, be strictly political. As Fredric Jameson writes, \"No work of art or culture can set out to be political once and for all...for there can never be any guarantee it will be used in the way it demands.\"(3) In other words, even though a political reading can be made of the work, the work of art is \"in itself inert.\"(4) In fact, in all the cases I have studied it is less the architecture or the art form which is deemed to be the ongoing location of protest than the actual act of creating them.My search for these hidden practices was governed by a desire to study the response to an obliteration of opportunity either in actual building processes or in wider forms of expression. Such a search can prove arduous. Those practices which do not fit the stereotypes understood by mainstream culture tend never to make it into the media where their message might be disseminated, and can therefore be destined to obscurity. Through this research it became apparent that the nature of resistance is not always \"radical\" but sometimes needs to be indirect: as said before, composed of subtle slippages and subversions.It is exactly these slippages and subversions that Steve Pile describes in Geographies of Resistance as \"tiny micro-movements of resistance\" (Pile, p. 29), assembled from the materials and practices of everyday life, that so strongly resonate with the views of Michel Foucault. In Power/Knowledge Foucault comments, \"Power is employed and exercised through a netlike organisation. And not only do individuals circulate between its threads; they are always in the position of simultaneously undergoing and exercising this power. They are not only its inert or consenting target they are always the elements of its articulation.\"(5)Hence, for Foucault power is never wholly expressed on a global scale, only at local innumerable points as 'micro-powers' in an \"endless network of power relations.\"(6) Foucault explains that \"the overthrow of these micro-powers does not obey the law of all or nothing.\" \"There is a plurality of resistances, each of them a special case.\"(7) In this way, as David Couzens-Hoy astutely observes in his article, \"Power, Repression, Progress\": Change does not occur by transforming the whole at once but only by resisting injustices at the particular points where they manifest themselves.\"(8)Through the panoptic mechanism Foucault famously extends his notion of power to the power/space relationship. However, this relationship cannot be specifically restricted to architectural space. By conjoining bodies and space, Foucault's panopticism is, as he describes, a \"generalised function\": \"a way of making power relations function in a function and of making a function function through these power relations. …","PeriodicalId":82477,"journal":{"name":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","volume":"29 1","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-Strategies of Resistance\",\"authors\":\"H. Stratford\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203003930-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Micro-strategies of resistance are particular confrontations with and resistances to the local impositions of dominating power. These incremental moves are not assembled from direct confrontations but rather operate as discrete traces within a plurality of resistances. Through a feminist critique this paper explores the implications that such an approach to resistance practices may hold for a feminist project in terms of intersections of power relations and spatial practice.Micro-strategies: space and architectureThe practice of all architects is to some extent an interpretation of the context in which they are located, whether this interpretation takes the form of tacit or explicit representation. This theoretical paper has evolved from research which explores the work of various architects and groups who, in the early 1980s, questioned political and/or professional orthodoxies in architecture around them. The scope of that larger study stretches wide, geographically and politically, including a number of countries in political transition such as South Africa, Russia, Romania and East Germany. The groups studied include the Paper Architects, Utopica, Form-Trans-Inform and Matrix.(2)The enterprises of the kind I have explored tend to be politically motivated since they respond to the social and/or cultural condition within which they are situated, even if the material itself cannot, by definition, be strictly political. As Fredric Jameson writes, \\\"No work of art or culture can set out to be political once and for all...for there can never be any guarantee it will be used in the way it demands.\\\"(3) In other words, even though a political reading can be made of the work, the work of art is \\\"in itself inert.\\\"(4) In fact, in all the cases I have studied it is less the architecture or the art form which is deemed to be the ongoing location of protest than the actual act of creating them.My search for these hidden practices was governed by a desire to study the response to an obliteration of opportunity either in actual building processes or in wider forms of expression. Such a search can prove arduous. Those practices which do not fit the stereotypes understood by mainstream culture tend never to make it into the media where their message might be disseminated, and can therefore be destined to obscurity. Through this research it became apparent that the nature of resistance is not always \\\"radical\\\" but sometimes needs to be indirect: as said before, composed of subtle slippages and subversions.It is exactly these slippages and subversions that Steve Pile describes in Geographies of Resistance as \\\"tiny micro-movements of resistance\\\" (Pile, p. 29), assembled from the materials and practices of everyday life, that so strongly resonate with the views of Michel Foucault. In Power/Knowledge Foucault comments, \\\"Power is employed and exercised through a netlike organisation. And not only do individuals circulate between its threads; they are always in the position of simultaneously undergoing and exercising this power. They are not only its inert or consenting target they are always the elements of its articulation.\\\"(5)Hence, for Foucault power is never wholly expressed on a global scale, only at local innumerable points as 'micro-powers' in an \\\"endless network of power relations.\\\"(6) Foucault explains that \\\"the overthrow of these micro-powers does not obey the law of all or nothing.\\\" \\\"There is a plurality of resistances, each of them a special case.\\\"(7) In this way, as David Couzens-Hoy astutely observes in his article, \\\"Power, Repression, Progress\\\": Change does not occur by transforming the whole at once but only by resisting injustices at the particular points where they manifest themselves.\\\"(8)Through the panoptic mechanism Foucault famously extends his notion of power to the power/space relationship. However, this relationship cannot be specifically restricted to architectural space. By conjoining bodies and space, Foucault's panopticism is, as he describes, a \\\"generalised function\\\": \\\"a way of making power relations function in a function and of making a function function through these power relations. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":82477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003930-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003930-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

抵抗的微观策略是对支配权力的地方强加的特殊对抗和抵抗。这些渐进式的行动不是由直接对抗组合而成的,而是在多重抵抗中作为离散的痕迹运作的。本文通过对女权主义的批判,探讨了在权力关系和空间实践的交叉点上,这种抵抗实践的方法对女权主义项目的意义。微观策略:空间和建筑所有建筑师的实践在某种程度上都是对他们所处环境的一种解释,无论这种解释是隐性的还是显性的。这篇理论论文是从对20世纪80年代早期不同建筑师和团体的工作的研究演变而来的,这些建筑师和团体质疑他们周围建筑的政治和/或专业正统。这项规模更大的研究的范围在地理和政治上都很广,包括南非、俄罗斯、罗马尼亚和东德等一些处于政治转型期的国家。研究的团体包括Paper Architects、Utopica、Form-Trans-Inform和Matrix。(2)我所探索的这类企业往往具有政治动机,因为它们对它们所处的社会和/或文化条件做出了反应,即使材料本身根据定义不能严格地具有政治意义。正如弗雷德里克·詹姆森(frederic Jameson)所写,“任何艺术或文化作品都不可能一劳永逸地成为政治作品……(3)换句话说,即使可以对作品进行政治解读,艺术作品“本身是惰性的”。(4)事实上,在我所研究的所有案例中,与其说建筑或艺术形式被认为是正在进行的抗议场所,不如说是创造它们的实际行为。我对这些隐藏的实践的探索是由一种愿望支配的,即研究在实际的建筑过程中或在更广泛的表达形式中对机会消失的反应。这样的搜索可能是艰苦的。那些不符合主流文化所理解的陈规定型观念的做法往往永远不会进入传播其信息的媒介,因此可能注定默默无闻。通过这项研究,很明显,抵抗的本质并不总是“激进的”,有时需要是间接的:如前所述,由微妙的滑动和颠覆组成。正是这些滑动和颠覆,史蒂夫·派尔在《抵抗地理学》中描述为“微小的抵抗运动”(派尔,第29页),从日常生活的材料和实践中聚集起来,与米歇尔·福柯的观点产生了强烈的共鸣。在《权力/知识》中,福柯评论道:“权力是通过一个网状的组织来运用和行使的。不仅个人在它的线程之间循环;他们总是处于同时承受和行使这种权力的地位。(5)因此,对于福柯来说,权力从来没有在全球范围内完全表达,只是在“无尽的权力关系网络”中作为“微权力”在无数的地方点上表达。(6)福柯解释说,“推翻这些微权力并不遵守全部或无的法则。”(7)这样,正如David Couzens-Hoy在他的文章《权力、压抑、进步》中敏锐地观察到的那样:变化不是通过立即改变整体而发生的,而是通过在它们表现出来的特定点上抵抗不公正而发生的。(8)通过全景机制,福柯著名地将他的权力概念扩展到权力/空间关系。然而,这种关系不能特别局限于建筑空间。通过将身体和空间结合起来,福柯的全景观,正如他所描述的那样,是一种“广义功能”:“一种使权力关系在功能中发挥作用,并通过这些权力关系使功能发挥作用的方式。”…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Micro-Strategies of Resistance
Micro-strategies of resistance are particular confrontations with and resistances to the local impositions of dominating power. These incremental moves are not assembled from direct confrontations but rather operate as discrete traces within a plurality of resistances. Through a feminist critique this paper explores the implications that such an approach to resistance practices may hold for a feminist project in terms of intersections of power relations and spatial practice.Micro-strategies: space and architectureThe practice of all architects is to some extent an interpretation of the context in which they are located, whether this interpretation takes the form of tacit or explicit representation. This theoretical paper has evolved from research which explores the work of various architects and groups who, in the early 1980s, questioned political and/or professional orthodoxies in architecture around them. The scope of that larger study stretches wide, geographically and politically, including a number of countries in political transition such as South Africa, Russia, Romania and East Germany. The groups studied include the Paper Architects, Utopica, Form-Trans-Inform and Matrix.(2)The enterprises of the kind I have explored tend to be politically motivated since they respond to the social and/or cultural condition within which they are situated, even if the material itself cannot, by definition, be strictly political. As Fredric Jameson writes, "No work of art or culture can set out to be political once and for all...for there can never be any guarantee it will be used in the way it demands."(3) In other words, even though a political reading can be made of the work, the work of art is "in itself inert."(4) In fact, in all the cases I have studied it is less the architecture or the art form which is deemed to be the ongoing location of protest than the actual act of creating them.My search for these hidden practices was governed by a desire to study the response to an obliteration of opportunity either in actual building processes or in wider forms of expression. Such a search can prove arduous. Those practices which do not fit the stereotypes understood by mainstream culture tend never to make it into the media where their message might be disseminated, and can therefore be destined to obscurity. Through this research it became apparent that the nature of resistance is not always "radical" but sometimes needs to be indirect: as said before, composed of subtle slippages and subversions.It is exactly these slippages and subversions that Steve Pile describes in Geographies of Resistance as "tiny micro-movements of resistance" (Pile, p. 29), assembled from the materials and practices of everyday life, that so strongly resonate with the views of Michel Foucault. In Power/Knowledge Foucault comments, "Power is employed and exercised through a netlike organisation. And not only do individuals circulate between its threads; they are always in the position of simultaneously undergoing and exercising this power. They are not only its inert or consenting target they are always the elements of its articulation."(5)Hence, for Foucault power is never wholly expressed on a global scale, only at local innumerable points as 'micro-powers' in an "endless network of power relations."(6) Foucault explains that "the overthrow of these micro-powers does not obey the law of all or nothing." "There is a plurality of resistances, each of them a special case."(7) In this way, as David Couzens-Hoy astutely observes in his article, "Power, Repression, Progress": Change does not occur by transforming the whole at once but only by resisting injustices at the particular points where they manifest themselves."(8)Through the panoptic mechanism Foucault famously extends his notion of power to the power/space relationship. However, this relationship cannot be specifically restricted to architectural space. By conjoining bodies and space, Foucault's panopticism is, as he describes, a "generalised function": "a way of making power relations function in a function and of making a function function through these power relations. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信