社区可持续评估工具(NSATS)在可持续城市设计中的局限性和前景

Q1 Social Sciences
F. Abastante
{"title":"社区可持续评估工具(NSATS)在可持续城市设计中的局限性和前景","authors":"F. Abastante","doi":"10.48264/vvsiev-20233204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to investigate the role of sustainability protocols at the neighborhood scale (Neighborhood Sustainable Assessment Tools) as possible tools to support the measurement of sustainability to implement effective design strategies for the built environment. Despite that cities and the built environment are at the forefront of achieving the complex goal of sustainable development, there is still a gap regarding what are the most appropriate ways and tools to measure and monitor the performance of urban transformation projects in terms of sustainable development. This difficulty is particularly evident when considering the sustainability paradigm in its Triple Bottom Line acception, which includes social and economic aspects in addition to environmental ones. In fact, while there are many established methodologies to measure the environmental performance of projects, the same cannot be said for the measurement of social and economic aspects, especially from an integrated perspective. Based on these premises, the present research analyzes three of the main NSATs at the European level, comparing them in terms of evaluation model and responsiveness to the main spheres of sustainability in order to trace limitations and perspectives.","PeriodicalId":37741,"journal":{"name":"Valori e Valutazioni","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits and perspectives of Neighbourhood Sustainable Assessment Tools (NSATS) in sustainable urban design\",\"authors\":\"F. Abastante\",\"doi\":\"10.48264/vvsiev-20233204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to investigate the role of sustainability protocols at the neighborhood scale (Neighborhood Sustainable Assessment Tools) as possible tools to support the measurement of sustainability to implement effective design strategies for the built environment. Despite that cities and the built environment are at the forefront of achieving the complex goal of sustainable development, there is still a gap regarding what are the most appropriate ways and tools to measure and monitor the performance of urban transformation projects in terms of sustainable development. This difficulty is particularly evident when considering the sustainability paradigm in its Triple Bottom Line acception, which includes social and economic aspects in addition to environmental ones. In fact, while there are many established methodologies to measure the environmental performance of projects, the same cannot be said for the measurement of social and economic aspects, especially from an integrated perspective. Based on these premises, the present research analyzes three of the main NSATs at the European level, comparing them in terms of evaluation model and responsiveness to the main spheres of sustainability in order to trace limitations and perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48264/vvsiev-20233204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valori e Valutazioni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48264/vvsiev-20233204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在研究可持续性协议在社区尺度上的作用(社区可持续评估工具),作为支持可持续性测量的可能工具,以实施有效的建筑环境设计策略。尽管城市和建筑环境处于实现可持续发展这一复杂目标的最前沿,但在可持续发展方面,衡量和监测城市转型项目绩效的最合适方法和工具仍然存在差距。在考虑可持续性范式的“三重底线”接受时,这一困难尤其明显,除了环境方面,它还包括社会和经济方面。事实上,虽然有许多既定的方法来衡量项目的环境绩效,但在衡量社会和经济方面,特别是从综合的角度来看,却没有同样的方法。基于这些前提,本研究分析了欧洲一级的三个主要国家安全评估机构,从评估模式和对可持续性主要领域的响应方面对它们进行了比较,以追踪其局限性和前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limits and perspectives of Neighbourhood Sustainable Assessment Tools (NSATS) in sustainable urban design
This paper aims to investigate the role of sustainability protocols at the neighborhood scale (Neighborhood Sustainable Assessment Tools) as possible tools to support the measurement of sustainability to implement effective design strategies for the built environment. Despite that cities and the built environment are at the forefront of achieving the complex goal of sustainable development, there is still a gap regarding what are the most appropriate ways and tools to measure and monitor the performance of urban transformation projects in terms of sustainable development. This difficulty is particularly evident when considering the sustainability paradigm in its Triple Bottom Line acception, which includes social and economic aspects in addition to environmental ones. In fact, while there are many established methodologies to measure the environmental performance of projects, the same cannot be said for the measurement of social and economic aspects, especially from an integrated perspective. Based on these premises, the present research analyzes three of the main NSATs at the European level, comparing them in terms of evaluation model and responsiveness to the main spheres of sustainability in order to trace limitations and perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Valori e Valutazioni
Valori e Valutazioni Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La rivista ufficiale della SIEV si intitola “Valori e Valutazioni. Teorie ed esperienze”/“Valori e Valutazioni” is the official journal of the Italian Society of Property Evaluation and Investment Decision (SIEV).La rivista si propone di diffondere la cultura della valutazione nei seguenti campi tematici: • architettura, ingegneria civile, edile, dell’ambiente e del territorio, • pianificazione territoriale, urbanistica e ambientale; • investimenti pubblici e privati di natura immobiliare e infrastrutturale; • mercato immobiliare e produzione edilizia; • tutela, valorizzazione e gestione dei beni culturali e ambientali; • finanza immobiliare. A tal fine analizza originali problemi valutativi ed espone applicazioni metodologiche avanzate, alimentando il dibattito scientifico-culturale. Data la multidisciplinarietà dei temi trattati, la rivista si rivolge ad un pubblico molto ampio ed eterogeneo costituito da studiosi e ricercatori, professionisti, imprenditori, tecnici e funzionari della Pubblica Amministrazione.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信